ADVERTISEMENT

Sea level to rise one foot along U.S. coastlines by 2050, government report finds

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
The shorelines of the United States are projected to face an additional foot of rising seas over the next three decades, intensifying the threat of flooding and erosion to coastal communities across the country, according to a report released Tuesday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Human-caused climate change, driven mostly by the burning of fossil fuels, has accelerated global sea level rise to the fastest rate in more than 3,000 years. The report by NOAA and other federal agencies — updating a study from 2017 — predicts that ocean levels along U.S. coasts will increase as much by 2050 as they did over the past century.
This amount of water battering the coasts “will create a profound increase in the frequency of coastal flooding, even in the absence of storms or heavy rainfall,” NOAA said.
“We’re unfortunately headed for a flood regime shift,” said William Sweet, an oceanographer at the NOAA National Ocean Service and the nation’s top scientist on sea level rise. “There will be water in the streets unless action is taken in more and more communities.”
Projections of sea level rise — relative to a baseline of 2000 — for five emissions scenarios and an extrapolation of observations (labeled as present trajectory) for the globe and contiguous United States. (NOAA)
Drawing on data from tidal gauges and satellite imagery as well as cutting-edge models from the most recent United Nations report on climate change, the NOAA analysis gives decade-by-decade projections for sea-level rise for all U.S. states and territories over the next 100 years. Advances in ice sheet modeling and better observational data allowed the authors to give more definitive near-term projections than ever before, Sweet said.
ADVERTISING
Even if the world takes swift action to curb carbon emissions, he said, the trajectory for sea level rise “is more or less set over the next 30 years.”
Kristina Dahl, a principal climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said research she and colleagues have done suggest that 10 to 12 inches of sea level rise by 2050 would put roughly 140,000 homes at risk of “chronic inundation,” or flooding every other week on average.
Already, she said, high-tide flooding in places such as Charleston, S.C., has quadrupled in frequency since the 1970s. Other communities, from Louisiana to New Jersey to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, have wrestled with flooding that has become more common and costly.
“They’re already having to make difficult decisions or major investments to cope with the flooding they are seeing,” said Dahl, who was not involved in Tuesday’s report. While other coastal communities have avoided major impacts, “they will have to start grappling with these same kind of issues.”
Federal report: High-tide flooding could happen ‘every other day’ by late this century
Looking ahead to the end of the century, the amount of planet-warming pollution people release into the atmosphere could mean the difference between sea levels stabilizing at about two feet above the historical average or surging by almost eight feet, NOAA reports.
“This report is a wake-up call for the U.S., but it’s a wake-up call with a silver lining,” NOAA administrator Rick Spinrad told journalists Tuesday. “It provides us with information needed to act now to best position ourselves for the future.”
A woman walks her dogs through a flooded area of Annapolis in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy in 2012. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)
In years past, powerful storms pushing water up shorelines were the primary drivers of flooding along coasts. But as surging seas raise the level of high tides, communities from the Gulf Coast and the Pacific Northwest to the beaches of Hawaii and the barrier islands of North Carolina increasingly suffer from “sunny day” floods, when saltwater bubbles up from storm drains and spills into streets without a drop of rain.
A report released last year by Sweet and his Ocean Service colleagues found that U.S. coastlines experience twice as much high-tide flooding as they did just 20 years ago.
By the middle of the century, the new NOAA analysis finds, minor high-tide flooding events could happen more than 10 times a year. More significant and destructive events, which currently have about a 4 percent chance of happening in a given year, could occur twice a decade.
“We are talking about flooding reaching an extra three feet or so above the average high tide,” Sweet said. “There are going to be serious consequences.”
This means coastal communities must start planning for regular inundation, scientists warned, especially in places where coastal development and sinking land compound the risks of sea level rise.
Storm and wastewater systems may need to be upgraded to cope with the influx of seawater. Homes and important infrastructure located within the new upper bounds of high tides might have to relocate.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: Joes Place
The shorelines of the United States are projected to face an additional foot of rising seas over the next three decades, intensifying the threat of flooding and erosion to coastal communities across the country, according to a report released Tuesday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Human-caused climate change, driven mostly by the burning of fossil fuels, has accelerated global sea level rise to the fastest rate in more than 3,000 years. The report by NOAA and other federal agencies — updating a study from 2017 — predicts that ocean levels along U.S. coasts will increase as much by 2050 as they did over the past century.
This amount of water battering the coasts “will create a profound increase in the frequency of coastal flooding, even in the absence of storms or heavy rainfall,” NOAA said.
“We’re unfortunately headed for a flood regime shift,” said William Sweet, an oceanographer at the NOAA National Ocean Service and the nation’s top scientist on sea level rise. “There will be water in the streets unless action is taken in more and more communities.”
Projections of sea level rise — relative to a baseline of 2000 — for five emissions scenarios and an extrapolation of observations (labeled as present trajectory) for the globe and contiguous United States. (NOAA)
Drawing on data from tidal gauges and satellite imagery as well as cutting-edge models from the most recent United Nations report on climate change, the NOAA analysis gives decade-by-decade projections for sea-level rise for all U.S. states and territories over the next 100 years. Advances in ice sheet modeling and better observational data allowed the authors to give more definitive near-term projections than ever before, Sweet said.
ADVERTISING
Even if the world takes swift action to curb carbon emissions, he said, the trajectory for sea level rise “is more or less set over the next 30 years.”
Kristina Dahl, a principal climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said research she and colleagues have done suggest that 10 to 12 inches of sea level rise by 2050 would put roughly 140,000 homes at risk of “chronic inundation,” or flooding every other week on average.
Already, she said, high-tide flooding in places such as Charleston, S.C., has quadrupled in frequency since the 1970s. Other communities, from Louisiana to New Jersey to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, have wrestled with flooding that has become more common and costly.
“They’re already having to make difficult decisions or major investments to cope with the flooding they are seeing,” said Dahl, who was not involved in Tuesday’s report. While other coastal communities have avoided major impacts, “they will have to start grappling with these same kind of issues.”
Federal report: High-tide flooding could happen ‘every other day’ by late this century
Looking ahead to the end of the century, the amount of planet-warming pollution people release into the atmosphere could mean the difference between sea levels stabilizing at about two feet above the historical average or surging by almost eight feet, NOAA reports.
“This report is a wake-up call for the U.S., but it’s a wake-up call with a silver lining,” NOAA administrator Rick Spinrad told journalists Tuesday. “It provides us with information needed to act now to best position ourselves for the future.”
A woman walks her dogs through a flooded area of Annapolis in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy in 2012. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)
In years past, powerful storms pushing water up shorelines were the primary drivers of flooding along coasts. But as surging seas raise the level of high tides, communities from the Gulf Coast and the Pacific Northwest to the beaches of Hawaii and the barrier islands of North Carolina increasingly suffer from “sunny day” floods, when saltwater bubbles up from storm drains and spills into streets without a drop of rain.
A report released last year by Sweet and his Ocean Service colleagues found that U.S. coastlines experience twice as much high-tide flooding as they did just 20 years ago.
By the middle of the century, the new NOAA analysis finds, minor high-tide flooding events could happen more than 10 times a year. More significant and destructive events, which currently have about a 4 percent chance of happening in a given year, could occur twice a decade.
“We are talking about flooding reaching an extra three feet or so above the average high tide,” Sweet said. “There are going to be serious consequences.”
This means coastal communities must start planning for regular inundation, scientists warned, especially in places where coastal development and sinking land compound the risks of sea level rise.
Storm and wastewater systems may need to be upgraded to cope with the influx of seawater. Homes and important infrastructure located within the new upper bounds of high tides might have to relocate.


No land buyouts

Let 'em sue the Saudis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So you guys just continue to shift the goalposts and start championing the new narrative as if the old narrative never existed? How much has the sea level risen over the last 30 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kzoohawk80
How much has the sea level risen over the last 30 years?
gmsl_2021rel2_seasons_rmvd.png



  • Around 4"
  • The increases are accelerating
  • The acceleration is both observed AND predicted by scientific models
  • The rise is not "even" all over the globe, and areas of the US East coast will experience higher sea level rise than other areas
 
Any chance we can arrange things so that Ames ends up under water?

Hey man, I'm on high ground, but I got to get around. Actually, Ames is finally taking steps to clear out trees and widen the Ioway Creek. That being said, businesses continue to build right next to it. I can't imagine the flood insurance cost given how many times its flash flooded out both the university and businesses down on Duff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Hey man, I'm on high ground, but I got to get around. Actually, Ames is finally taking steps to clear out trees and widen the Ioway Creek. That being said, businesses continue to build right next to it. I can't imagine the flood insurance cost given how many times its flash flooded out both the university and businesses down on Duff.
EVKZqLLUEAE1zQr.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy McGill
president-barack-obama-hawaii3-730x506.jpg


Has anyone told Obama this? His second multimillion dollar beach home is nearing completion just a few feet above sea level in Hawaii. I guess he is a science denier...

 
The rise is not "even" all over the globe, and areas of the US East coast will experience higher sea level rise than other areas
I’d like to understand the reasoning for this better. We know plate tectonics can shift upward/downward. But on NPR this afternoon, they specifically mentioned oil and gas mining as a culprit.
 
I’d like to understand the reasoning for this better. We know plate tectonics can shift upward/downward. But on NPR this afternoon, they specifically mentioned oil and gas mining as a culprit.
More drilling along the Gulf Coast and East Coast cause the land to subside. Pair that with rising water and you get problems. The slowing of the Gulf Stream is also implicated in higher sea level rise along the East Coast. Prevailing winds push the Atlantic away from the coast and a strong Gulf Stream keeps that water from flowing back. There's literally a hump in the middle of the Atlantic. As the Gulf Stream weakens, that water is allowed to push back toward the US.

Another issue is that the northern part of the continent was pushed down during the last ice age by the huge mass of ice that covered it. South of that sheet, the land mass rose. That northern region is still rebounding upward after the ice retreated while south of that the land is sinking back down.

USGS_ice-sheet_fig143.jpg
 
More drilling along the Gulf Coast and East Coast cause the land to subside. Pair that with rising water and you get problems. The slowing of the Gulf Stream is also implicated in higher sea level rise along the East Coast. Prevailing winds push the Atlantic away from the coast and a strong Gulf Stream keeps that water from flowing back. There's literally a hump in the middle of the Atlantic. As the Gulf Stream weakens, that water is allowed to push back toward the US.

Another issue is that the northern part of the continent was pushed down during the last ice age by the huge mass of ice that covered it. South of that sheet, the land mass rose. That northern region is still rebounding upward after the ice retreated while south of that the land is sinking back down.

USGS_ice-sheet_fig143.jpg
Wouldn’t offshore drilling in those same areas cause the ocean floor to also subside? If the bottom of the northern Gulf of Mexico drops could that compensate for water rise? There are so many rigs there you can hop from Galveston to Mobile without getting wet.
 
I’d like to understand the reasoning for this better. We know plate tectonics can shift upward/downward. But on NPR this afternoon, they specifically mentioned oil and gas mining as a culprit.
I’ve read that the Mississippi basin in Louisiana is sinking, with the blame assigned to extraction.
The Army Corps of Engineers making a canal of the Mississippi is also screwing up the maintenance and formation of the delta.
Forbes.
 
Wouldn’t offshore drilling in those same areas cause the ocean floor to also subside? If the bottom of the northern Gulf of Mexico drops could that compensate for water rise? There are so many rigs there you can hop from Galveston to Mobile without getting wet.
It will subside but that's not the problem - it's not "the water fills in those holes so it won't fill in these". The problem is the onshore land sinking as the sea levels are rising. What subsidence occurs underwater has next to no effect on sea level rise.

I didn't hear the story you mentioned but I'd guess that focusing on gas and oil drilling would be a part of the story. Drinking water is being pulled out of the ground as well and that will add to the onshore subsidence issue. Looking at the report, they're calling for an 18" combination of sea level rise and subsidence in spots along the Gulf Coast from TX to MS. If we don't plan for that...STOP building in the areas that will be affected and start making plans to pull back in the areas already populated...the outcomes will be really expensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
If we don't plan for that...STOP building in the areas that will be affected and start making plans to pull back in the areas already populated...the outcomes will be really expensive.
Do you think Obama will be convinced to stop?
Or are “we” rich enough to build on the coast?
 
Do you think Obama will be convinced to stop?
Or are “we” rich enough to build on the coast?
LOL...I don't GAF where Obama builds and I have no idea what the prognosis is for the area where he IS building.. If he's building in an area destined to be inundated, it's dumb. Does that give you a tingle?

What should be happening is the govt stepping in and zoning those areas at risk as off limits for building but I doubt you're going to go along with that so you get to help pay when all those millionaires' homes get flooded. But...you know...freedumb and shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
LOL...I don't GAF where Obama builds and I have no idea what the prognosis is for the area where he IS building.. If he's building in an area destined to be inundated, it's dumb. Does that give you a tingle?

What should be happening is the govt stepping in and zoning those areas at risk as off limits for building but I doubt you're going to go along with that so you get to help pay when all those millionaires' homes get flooded. But...you know...freedumb and shit.
No, making me pay for Obama's house wouldn't be freedom.
Freedom is letting Obama own a beach house at Martha's Vineyard and rebuild a beach house in Hawaii if he wants to.
It's his money.
I want him to have the freedom (or freedumb, if that gives you a tingle) to spend the money he has earned how he wants, even if you think it's foolhardy.

You're the one that thinks people shouldn't be allowed to build on the coast. I say, let them, but don't let them force the costs onto others via the government. If you quit looking at the government as a piggybank for what ails anybody, you can let people have more freedom (or freedumb, if that gives you a tingle).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clownhater
No, making me pay for Obama's house wouldn't be freedom.
Freedom is letting Obama own a beach house at Martha's Vineyard and rebuild a beach house in Hawaii if he wants to.
It's his money.
I want him to have the freedom (or freedumb, if that gives you a tingle) to spend the money he has earned how he wants, even if you think it's foolhardy.

You're the one that thinks people shouldn't be allowed to build on the coast. I say, let them, but don't let them force the costs onto others via the government. If you quit looking at the government as a piggybank for what ails anybody, you can let people have more freedom (or freedumb, if that gives you a tingle).
You live in a fantasy. About 15% of all coastal real estate is at risk. What happens when hundreds of billions of dollars (as much as $1T according to some estimates). in housing is no longer viable and property owners abandon them and walk away from the mortgages because they can't sell? For a refresher, see 2008. What is at risk from sea level rise makes 2008 look like a blip and once the collapse of that market begins, there might be no stopping it. It's not just "his money". You want to allow someone to exercise their "freedom" to build where they want and NOT have it spill back on you? Good luck with that. Planning NOW could, at least, mitigate what's coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
president-barack-obama-hawaii3-730x506.jpg


Has anyone told Obama this? His second multimillion dollar beach home is nearing completion just a few feet above sea level in Hawaii. I guess he is a science denier...

Wait a second. Obama tore down the Magnum PI house? Wait till the MAGAs find out about this.
 
president-barack-obama-hawaii3-730x506.jpg


Has anyone told Obama this? His second multimillion dollar beach home is nearing completion just a few feet above sea level in Hawaii.

He'll be fine. Sea levels around Hawaii aren't going to rise as fast as the US east coast.

And he'll be dead well before things get to "the few feet" which would flood the place. Weird that your pic shows a seawall put in along that beach, too - almost like folks KNOW they'll need to mitigate...
 
You live in a fantasy.
I consider your desire to make me pay for rich people’s coastal housing dystopian.
Quit supporting bailouts

About 15% of all coastal real estate is at risk. What happens when hundreds of billions of dollars (as much as $1T according to some estimates). in housing is no longer viable and property owners abandon them and walk away from the mortgages because they can't sell? For a refresher, see 2008. What is at risk from sea level rise makes 2008 look like a blip and once the collapse of that market begins, there might be no stopping it.
‘No stopping it’?
Extremely ludicrous.
Housing has value because people want it. When Obama’s property on Martha’s Vineyard is submerged, it won’t be worth much of anything. There are some lots you’ll see on the plat map for Alligator point that are now underwater. And yet people with the money to burn keep buying the properties alongside them because they view it as a worthwhile consumption of their earnings for that view.
In your subjective opinion it’s not worth it, but it’s not your money to burn.

It's not just "his money". You want to allow someone to exercise their "freedom" to build where they want and NOT have it spill back on you? Good luck with that. Planning NOW could, at least, mitigate what's coming.
The average age of housing stock in the country is 37 years.
Things are continually torn asunder and rebuilt to suit, where it suits.
Quit supporting socializing losses and it’s their problem when it becomes a problem.
Telling them they can’t enjoy the view from there today because you imagine at some point they won’t be able to enjoy the view from there? Good luck with that. Obama and Co. ain’t listening.
 
I’d like to understand the reasoning for this better. We know plate tectonics can shift upward/downward. But on NPR this afternoon, they specifically mentioned oil and gas mining as a culprit.

Oil/gas is impacting land levels in places like New Orleans.
Not "everywhere", so I'd be curious on the context of what you think they said.

Google up about why the US east coast will have faster sea level rise.

The science on that is pretty understandable. Combination of Gulf Stream effects, land subsidence from 'glacial rebound', gravitational effects as the ice on Greenland disappears, and warming waters increasing in volume, overall, etc.
 
Everyone needs to turn on their dehumidifiers at the same time in 2049 for the whole year. Problem solved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
I’ll be six feet under by then. But I do hope my grandkids are prepared.
 
He'll be fine. Sea levels around Hawaii aren't going to rise as fast as the US east coast.

And he'll be dead well before things get to "the few feet" which would flood the place. Weird that your pic shows a seawall put in along that beach, too - almost like folks KNOW they'll need to mitigate...
If you read the linked article @Joes Place, the sea wall was existing and should have been removed as sea walls contribute to costal erosion but deep pockets OB 1 saw fit to end run the regulations Al Gore style. “ Do as I say not as I do “…
 
If you read the linked article @Joes Place, the sea wall was existing and should have been removed as sea walls contribute to costal erosion but deep pockets OB 1 saw fit to end run the regulations Al Gore style. “ Do as I say not as I do “…

If you read the linked article, they make that claim w/o any citation or background information.

In some cases that may be true, but sea walls are actually used to MINIMIZE coastal erosion, and I'd bet DailyMail is misleading you in this case.
 
The shorelines of the United States are projected to face an additional foot of rising seas over the next three decades, intensifying the threat of flooding and erosion to coastal communities across the country, according to a report released Tuesday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Human-caused climate change, driven mostly by the burning of fossil fuels, has accelerated global sea level rise to the fastest rate in more than 3,000 years. The report by NOAA and other federal agencies — updating a study from 2017 — predicts that ocean levels along U.S. coasts will increase as much by 2050 as they did over the past century.
This amount of water battering the coasts “will create a profound increase in the frequency of coastal flooding, even in the absence of storms or heavy rainfall,” NOAA said.
“We’re unfortunately headed for a flood regime shift,” said William Sweet, an oceanographer at the NOAA National Ocean Service and the nation’s top scientist on sea level rise. “There will be water in the streets unless action is taken in more and more communities.”
Projections of sea level rise — relative to a baseline of 2000 — for five emissions scenarios and an extrapolation of observations (labeled as present trajectory) for the globe and contiguous United States. (NOAA)
Drawing on data from tidal gauges and satellite imagery as well as cutting-edge models from the most recent United Nations report on climate change, the NOAA analysis gives decade-by-decade projections for sea-level rise for all U.S. states and territories over the next 100 years. Advances in ice sheet modeling and better observational data allowed the authors to give more definitive near-term projections than ever before, Sweet said.
ADVERTISING
Even if the world takes swift action to curb carbon emissions, he said, the trajectory for sea level rise “is more or less set over the next 30 years.”
Kristina Dahl, a principal climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said research she and colleagues have done suggest that 10 to 12 inches of sea level rise by 2050 would put roughly 140,000 homes at risk of “chronic inundation,” or flooding every other week on average.
Already, she said, high-tide flooding in places such as Charleston, S.C., has quadrupled in frequency since the 1970s. Other communities, from Louisiana to New Jersey to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, have wrestled with flooding that has become more common and costly.
“They’re already having to make difficult decisions or major investments to cope with the flooding they are seeing,” said Dahl, who was not involved in Tuesday’s report. While other coastal communities have avoided major impacts, “they will have to start grappling with these same kind of issues.”
Federal report: High-tide flooding could happen ‘every other day’ by late this century
Looking ahead to the end of the century, the amount of planet-warming pollution people release into the atmosphere could mean the difference between sea levels stabilizing at about two feet above the historical average or surging by almost eight feet, NOAA reports.
“This report is a wake-up call for the U.S., but it’s a wake-up call with a silver lining,” NOAA administrator Rick Spinrad told journalists Tuesday. “It provides us with information needed to act now to best position ourselves for the future.”
A woman walks her dogs through a flooded area of Annapolis in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy in 2012. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)
In years past, powerful storms pushing water up shorelines were the primary drivers of flooding along coasts. But as surging seas raise the level of high tides, communities from the Gulf Coast and the Pacific Northwest to the beaches of Hawaii and the barrier islands of North Carolina increasingly suffer from “sunny day” floods, when saltwater bubbles up from storm drains and spills into streets without a drop of rain.
A report released last year by Sweet and his Ocean Service colleagues found that U.S. coastlines experience twice as much high-tide flooding as they did just 20 years ago.
By the middle of the century, the new NOAA analysis finds, minor high-tide flooding events could happen more than 10 times a year. More significant and destructive events, which currently have about a 4 percent chance of happening in a given year, could occur twice a decade.
“We are talking about flooding reaching an extra three feet or so above the average high tide,” Sweet said. “There are going to be serious consequences.”
This means coastal communities must start planning for regular inundation, scientists warned, especially in places where coastal development and sinking land compound the risks of sea level rise.
Storm and wastewater systems may need to be upgraded to cope with the influx of seawater. Homes and important infrastructure located within the new upper bounds of high tides might have to relocate.

So?
 

I'll make a $1M "weather" bet with you.

The noontime temperature in Des Moines, IA will be colder than the noontime temperature in Phoenix, AZ on January 5, 2023.

I cannot predict the "weather" in either location. So you (allegedly) have a 50/50 chance here.

Interested?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT