Don't try to take away their boogeyman.
Security threat
- Thread starter Hawk_82
- Start date
Probably…..even though the “Security” of that particular building had been assigned by theSS to a local LE agency….and they decided to secure the property from “inside”the structure as opposed to putting a body on the roof.
Like I have said, SS is the “low hanging fruit” here….even though their plan might have been “perfect” and some part of the plan screwed up, most folks will blame the Secret Service and its lead officials.
Seriously?
That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time.
If a woman is 100% qualified that is great. But if they are NOT?
DEI turns into DIE.
I don't think anyone said there shouldn't be ANY women in it.
If it was YOUR life, do you want the most qualified people protecting it or the most diverse?
I'll hang up and listen.
How do YOU know the women being hired are not the more qualified of the applicants, HM? You are supposing they aren’t based on, what? Perhaps the point of the comment was women were not being hired for SS positions because….they were women……and the new director is ensuring women get ant least equal treatment for future openings?
I dunno I lost track... have I chimed in on this thread yet? with iran and sloped roof stuff? and trans tennessee shooter stuff? well now I have...
yesterday I heard an interview with either don jr or eric, one of trump's sons. I get them mixed up on the radio because I cannot see them and they both have that NY accent, anywhos.... he said that one female agent on stage, the blonde one, not the holster chick.... was his good friend and she was great. very good. very kind and would do anything for you. he likes her. I dunno about any other of these ladies, but that's what he said about this one.
The implication you’re making here is that diversity and qualified are mutually exclusive.
Never said I did.
But if you start making hiring decisions such as "we want 30% of our ee's to be women" that most likely means SOME (not all) are getting jobs over more qualified individuals.
That goes for sex, color, religion, orientation, everything.
Sex and color should NEVER be the focus on a hire. Never.
No I don’t.
You specifically stated you could have the most qualified or the most diverse.
What’s hilarious here is that I guarantee nobody on this board could tell us what the breakdown of trumps SS detail based on gender, race, etc.
There are. Plenty of jobs in every type of venture where females are. As qualified as males…and vice versa…..”best qualified” is a subjective assessment at best…..in the real world you and I both understand this seldom if ever occurs…..Hiring qualified people is paramount…….”best qualified” is blue sky personnel speak.
And you are right ….sex, and color should never be the focus of a hire…..but then, that’s illegal, right?
- Sep 13, 2002
- 100,974
- 214,628
- 113
The only job you’re good at is being a dumbass.
You make our entire gender look stupider every time you sit at a keyboard.
Thanks, dick.
Would you rather have 100% qualified people or would you rather have someone that maybe wasn't as qualified as another person because of DEI?
The lady on the left was a joke. ZERO chance she was the most qualified when she was hired. But hey, let's be more diverse and hire more women. Fat tub couldn't even holster her service weapon after five attempts.
You’re ridiculous. Now you can judge based on a photo that someone was hired because of DEI?Would you rather have 100% qualified people or would you rather have someone that maybe wasn't as qualified as another person because of DEI?
The lady on the left was a joke. ZERO chance she was the most qualified when she was hired. But hey, let's be more diverse and hire more women. Fat tub couldn't even holster her service weapon after five attempts.
Unless you can show someone who didn’t meet any of the other qualifications needed to apply for the Secret Service, just shut up.
As another poster mentioned, the idea that someone is the MOST qualified is completely subjective.
Yes; I’m sure the secret service hired someone who doesn’t know how to handle a gun…
Also, that’s a picture, not a video genius.
Oh, I must have missed where I said, click on the video below.
Look it up if you want.
Qualifications for Special Agents
Be in excellent health and physical condition
FAIL.
- Carry and use a firearm.*
FAIL.
But once again, let's get to that 30% goal!!!!!!!!!!!
You said to watch the video. You provided no video.
I don’t care, because I’m not a sexist dick.
I have zero concerns that this woman can do the job.
Nope, this is the insanity. Watch the 30 second clip of the head of secret service explaining why the roof the assassin was on wasn't secured. This is the type of shit you get when the wrong people are hired for the wrong reasons for critical jobs like these.
Secret Service boss blames ‘sloped roof’ for not putting sniper team on building used by would-be Trump assassin
Secret Service boss blames ‘sloped roof’ for not putting sniper team on building used by would-be Trump assassin
www.yahoo.com
I don't agree with your statement.
Some evaluations may be a close call and thus a level of subjectivity may creep in.
In many cases determining "most qualified" is clear cut.
The 30 by 30 Initiative is ridiculous.
You’re going to need define what “most qualified” means then. I doubt there’s a law enforcement agency in the country with higher qualification standards in the country than the Secret Service - particularly for the protection details.
In my opinion, “most qualified” at that level of qualification is almost meaningless.
This is how we got the kami hairy Harris problem. I don't care how qualified she is but I'm hiring a black lady. Signed , Joe Brandon
You can't get more DEI than this lady.
Black AND gay!
I've taken dumps smarter than her.
