Selection Sunday Surprises
- Thread starter jaysonjohn2012
- Start date
Mich St as a 2 seed. Figured they'd get a one.
How about 10 loss Duke getting a 4 seed.
Texas too what a joke at 6.
The West is incredibly weak compared to the teams in the south.
Texas too what a joke at 6.
The West is incredibly weak compared to the teams in the south.
Theres a huge Wisky crowd waiting for their selection. So can we assume they will get in. That would mean WI, IN, Purdue are all in the last two regions
A
anon_i8nzeu2gbf0ba
Guest
Syracuse (19-13) is slightly more deserving than Nebraska. What a miserable selection. Nice job, committee. You are a bunch of bozos. Leave out a deserving team and just throw anybody in there. Good thing you have all those criteria to judge by. Just incredibly awful...Syracuse. Shame.
Who? CBS? We've gotten a huge amount of love from them in this show.
Syracuse, Vanderbilt, and Tulsa are pathetic at large selections. I mean terrible. The idea they may give credit to Syracuse for overcoming their coaches ban for violating NCAA rules is as dumb as it is inappropriate.
I have since switched channels. But when it was first announced. Charles said Iowa only because he was told. He said he hasnt watched neither Iowa nor Temple enough. Then everyone else kept going on and on about a Temple-Nova matchup.
So if they gave love, I must have missed that part
That was done for Oklahoma who was knocked out by MSU last year. No coincidence that selection committee head I think was the Oklahoma AD.
And he didn't predict it. He said it would be an exciting matchup because of the locations of the schools.
I agree the BiG appeared to get dissed and the Big XII got a lot of respect. Since I am not a conspiracy theorist, my assessment is that the committee thought the latter conference was better than the former. Whether that is correct or not is another discussion altogether. But if you proceed from the assumption that the Big XII was stronger than the BiG this season, the seeding is fairly logical.
For the benefit of the mouth-breathers, I will repeat: Whether that is correct or not is another discussion altogether. In other words, I'm not claiming this "proves" anything about the relative strength of the leagues. My point relates to the perception by the committee members.
isu grad logic truly believes that 13-11 since winning their Super Bowl justifies isu being a 3 seed.
What is next the SOS argument or the close loss argument? Either way it will be entertaining watching isu grad fall all over themselves.
So isu grad goes to the SOS argument. The funny thing about isu grads touting SOS is that if SOS was accurate, teams with better SOS would do better in the post season.
Maybe some day isu grad will have an argument that isn't a myth.
Don't bring up anything that exposes holes in isu grad logic, that would be a capital offense punishable by death.
