Should Obama Cancel Citizens United By Executive Order?

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Is that really what my article does? Oh my goodness - how could I have ever known that but for your insight?

Instead of looking down your nose at everyone who disagrees with you it would be wise to make sure you are actually advocating a position grounded in objective reality - and not just in political spin.

You really don't understand thinking very well, do you? You found an article that made you feel good but didn't actually support your point. And now you're upset that I pointed out the obvious.

 

[Metuo Accipiter]

You really don't understand thinking very well, do you? You found an article that made you feel good but didn't actually support your point. And now you're upset that I pointed out the obvious.

I understand exactly what my article said. Go back to my post and look at what I wrote. You are putting your own opinion of what I said into it --- I never stated my article did the things your trying to claim. Here is my claim:

But of course - most folks who are rational will agree with this vanity fair article - that the idea one party dominating the lie department is obviously a fallacy.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

I understand exactly what my article said. Go back to my post and look at what I wrote. You are putting your own opinion of what I said into it --- I never stated my article did the things your trying to claim. Here is my claim:

But of course - most folks who are rational will agree with this vanity fair article - that the idea one party dominating the lie department is obviously a fallacy.

Wow. You can't even quote your own comment honestly. What you said (when you don't edit out the point-setting part) was this:

"If you really believe that the right lies considerably more than the left - then of course it's easy for you to fall for almost any grubering the left throws out. But of course - most folks who are rational will agree with this vanity fair article - that the idea one party dominating the lie department is obviously a fallacy."

The point being discussed was the well-established fact that the right lies more than the left. You presented an article that supposedly shows this well-established fact to be a fallacy, in your words. It failed to do that and I called you on it. Now you are trying to pretend that wasn't your point.

But thanks for another good example of how the right lies.

 

[The Tradition]

What a dumb argument. Everything that Hillary says is a lie. Her ass must be jealous of her mouth because that's where all the crap comes out.

 

[Metuo Accipiter]

Wow. You can't even quote your own comment honestly. What you said (when you don't edit out the point-setting part) was this:

"If you really believe that the right lies considerably more than the left - then of course it's easy for you to fall for almost any grubering the left throws out. But of course - most folks who are rational will agree with this vanity fair article - that the idea one party dominating the lie department is obviously a fallacy."

The point being discussed was the well-established fact that the right lies more than the left. You presented an article that supposedly shows this well-established fact to be a fallacy, in your words. It failed to do that and I called you on it. Now you are trying to pretend that wasn't your point.

But thanks for another good example of how the right lies.

It appears the right lies because the left can't follow along. Clearly the article I linked was only addressing that one study. Given the title - that should be obvious: "The Flawed, Statistically Silly New Study That Calls the Republican Party More Dishonest"

And clearly the text I quoted only addressed that one study. Anything contemplating more than this one study was my own opinion - and the opinion of most rational non-partisan people of course. The only projection beyond this study that I did was inferring that any of these silly, simplistic studies you are relying on are fallacies on their face. They are as big of lies as the dishonesty they are supposedly tracking.