No no, Trump said prices will come down as soon as he takes office. I would hate to think the rapist and convicted felon was lying.
Well I guess we'll see then!
No no, Trump said prices will come down as soon as he takes office. I would hate to think the rapist and convicted felon was lying.
I know acquiring Greenland came up in his first term, but does anyone know why Trump has a interest in Greenland?
As I recall, this was primarily related to national security and the increasing viability of the northwest passage as a shipping route due to climate change...
Thanks, but I find it hard to believe the existence of climate change is acknowledged as a reason for doing anything by Trump and his followers. There's got to be some other silly or self serving explanation, probably related to his celebrity/TV fame coming from making 'deals' and real estate related transactions.
Well no. It can't be acknowledged. Doesn't mean it doesn't factor into decision making.Thanks, but I find it hard to believe the existence of climate change is acknowledged as a reason for doing anything by Trump and his followers. There's got to be some other silly or self serving explanation, probably related to his celebrity/TV fame coming from making 'deals' and real estate related transactions.
Yeah, we've really needed to be in control of Greenland all these years.As I recall, this was primarily related to national security and the increasing viability of the northwest passage as a shipping route due to climate change...
Serious question: if you get an asset on the books in return, is it necessarily a deficit?Asking for a friend
Controlling the Northwest Passage and Panama Canal would both be a major economic asset.Thanks, but I find it hard to believe the existence of climate change is acknowledged as a reason for doing anything by Trump and his followers. There's got to be some other silly or self serving explanation, probably related to his celebrity/TV fame coming from making 'deals' and real estate related transactions.
I think it has oil and natural gas resources as well as some rare earth metals used in electric cars.Thanks, but I find it hard to believe the existence of climate change is acknowledged as a reason for doing anything by Trump and his followers. There's got to be some other silly or self serving explanation, probably related to his celebrity/TV fame coming from making 'deals' and real estate related transactions.
Greenland is a loss leader currently. Denmark has to subsidize them billions just to maintain a population.
Do we really want to entertain the idea of military action to claim it? Even if it’s an empty threat. It isn’t a smart tactic for a host of reasons.We should dump Puerto Rico before we entertain additional land.
Do we really want to entertain the idea of military action to claim it? Even if it’s an empty threat. It isn’t a smart tactic for a host of reasons.
Did he really say he hasn’t ruled out military force to take Greenland and The Canal. Crazy.
Then why not send the message to the Chinese. Mixed signals start Wars unnecessarily as well. See our responses to Iraq and their intentions with Kuwait. Saddam our ally at the time felt he had the green light. While Israel and Saudi Arabia our other allies disagreed. Repressive governments such as Russia, North Korea, Iran, China understand direct talk way better than whatever this is.I expect this is all about Chinese encroachment, and sending a message.
I tend to agree that this is a form of probing to gauge reactions. And you are right, probing can be dangerous, though this one is so off the reservation crazy that I suspect the true risks are relatively low.Then why not send the message to the Chinese. Mixed signals start Wars unnecessarily as well. See our responses to Iraq and their intentions with Kuwait. Saddam our ally at the time felt he had the green light. While Israel and Saudi Arabia our other allies disagreed. Repressive governments such as Russia, North Korea, Iran, China understand direct talk way better than whatever this is.
Not only is trump not going to do anything to lower prices, he plans to increase inflation with his tariffs.This talk is a diversion since it's already been realized Trump isn't going to do anything he promised in the campaign...again.
Then why not send the message to the Chinese. Mixed signals start Wars unnecessarily as well. See our responses to Iraq and their intentions with Kuwait. Saddam our ally at the time felt he had the green light. While Israel and Saudi Arabia our other allies disagreed. Repressive governments such as Russia, North Korea, Iran, China understand direct talk way better than whatever this is.
Well the Chinese don’t think the way we do. Of course with the amount of hacking by them. Probably past time to care about how they think. Their internal issues are making them more aggressive. The more trade removed from them is reminding me more of the situation the Japanese Empire found themselves in pre Pearl Harbor.I tend to agree that this is a form of probing to gauge reactions. And you are right, probing can be dangerous, though this one is so off the reservation crazy that I suspect the true risks are relatively low.
If you start using this tactic. Some countries will either discount it or take it too seriously in other instances. I’m thinking along the lines in other dialogues. The North Koreans, Russians, Iranians, Syrians , South Africa, etc etc. Name the hot spot or potential hot spot.How will his comments start a war? A war with whom?
🤔I think it has oil and natural gas resources as well as some rare earth metals used in electric cars.
Why doesn’t he just tell that to China then?I expect this is all about Chinese encroachment, and sending a message.
The next four years are going to be an unmitigated disaster.Not only is trump not going to do anything to lower prices, he plans to increase inflation with his tariffs.
He really should just stop having his bibles made in China if they bother him that much.Then why not send the message to the Chinese. Mixed signals start Wars unnecessarily as well. See our responses to Iraq and their intentions with Kuwait. Saddam our ally at the time felt he had the green light. While Israel and Saudi Arabia our other allies disagreed. Repressive governments such as Russia, North Korea, Iran, China understand direct talk way better than whatever this is.
Remember when you told us Susan Wiles was going to run a tight ship?Only if you believe that’s actually going to happen.
Yo really think this is 4D level probing by a genius level negotiator?I tend to agree that this is a form of probing to gauge reactions. And you are right, probing can be dangerous, though this one is so off the reservation crazy that I suspect the true risks are relatively low.