...by a combined 49 points. Wow, what happened?
Well said, and spot on.Pretty simple we had 6-8 guys all playing great basketball for a period of time. After that time, we just have not had that same consistency. Some of the guys were playing way above their norms to like Uhl shooting 55% from 3. There was bound to be a return to the mean for guys. When that play tapered off so did the team's confidence.
That is good coaching by our opponents and poor coaching by the Iowa staff to make any changesMy assumption is that Iowa was somewhat lightly scouted early in the year. People expected Uthoff to be good, but not THAT good, people expected Jok to be solid, but not THAT solid. The bench was scoring way more points than what was expected.
Teams understand how to defend Iowa now. Harass Uthoff and Jok, they will get theirs but make it difficult. Never double on Woody because he won't beat you consistently in the post. Make Gesell and Clemmons beat you. If they do, great... odds are that they won't.
Indiana has done a great job of pulling Woody out of the paint defensively, launching a three, crashing the boards and getting a reboot on the shot clock.
Honestly, it really just seems like Iowa has been scouted and they don't really have much of an answer outside of hoping someone besides Jok and Uthoff can put up some points.
That is good coaching by our opponents and poor coaching by the Iowa staff to make any changes
My assumption is that Iowa was somewhat lightly scouted early in the year. People expected Uthoff to be good, but not THAT good, people expected Jok to be solid, but not THAT solid. The bench was scoring way more points than what was expected.
Teams understand how to defend Iowa now. Harass Uthoff and Jok, they will get theirs but make it difficult. Never double on Woody because he won't beat you consistently in the post. Make Gesell and Clemmons beat you. If they do, great... odds are that they won't.
Indiana has done a great job of pulling Woody out of the paint defensively, launching a three, crashing the boards and getting a reboot on the shot clock.
Honestly, it really just seems like Iowa has been scouted and they don't really have much of an answer outside of hoping someone besides Jok and Uthoff can put up some points.
I think what happened the past 3-4 weeks is well below the "mean" ...but your point is valid.Pretty simple we had 6-8 guys all playing great basketball for a period of time. After that time, we just have not had that same consistency. Some of the guys were playing way above their norms to like Uhl shooting 55% from 3. There was bound to be a return to the mean for guys. When that play tapered off so did the team's confidence.
...by a combined 49 points. Wow, what happened?
My assumption is that Iowa was somewhat lightly scouted early in the year. People expected Uthoff to be good, but not THAT good, people expected Jok to be solid, but not THAT solid. The bench was scoring way more points than what was expected.
Teams understand how to defend Iowa now. Harass Uthoff and Jok, they will get theirs but make it difficult. Never double on Woody because he won't beat you consistently in the post. Make Gesell and Clemmons beat you. If they do, great... odds are that they won't.
Indiana has done a great job of pulling Woody out of the paint defensively, launching a three, crashing the boards and getting a reboot on the shot clock.
Honestly, it really just seems like Iowa has been scouted and they don't really have much of an answer outside of hoping someone besides Jok and Uthoff can put up some points.
In better days, you were guaranteeing an Iowa win over Indiana--wish you had been right.
Uthoff and Jok had spectacular years. Gesell, Clemmons, Baer, Uhl were hot for awhile, now they are not. Woody is Woody. Fran wasted a chance to make a run for B1G title. Iowa rarely has two players of Uthoff/Jok Caliber. All Fran needed to do is recruit a decent guard, and he didn't get it done. Clemmons/Gesell--4 years of Meh. Hard to believe, but they haven't improved their offensive game at all in 4 years.
My assumption is that Iowa was somewhat lightly scouted early in the year. People expected Uthoff to be good, but not THAT good, people expected Jok to be solid, but not THAT solid. The bench was scoring way more points than what was expected.
Teams understand how to defend Iowa now. Harass Uthoff and Jok, they will get theirs but make it difficult. Never double on Woody because he won't beat you consistently in the post. Make Gesell and Clemmons beat you. If they do, great... odds are that they won't.
Indiana has done a great job of pulling Woody out of the paint defensively, launching a three, crashing the boards and getting a reboot on the shot clock.
Honestly, it really just seems like Iowa has been scouted and they don't really have much of an answer outside of hoping someone besides Jok and Uthoff can put up some points.
Not sure. Same team just lost to 3 teams that wont sniff NCAA tourney....by a combined 49 points. Wow, what happened?
Clemmons was playing really well until the last couple weeks. I think he's trying to do too much, causing him to make mistakes. My biggest problem is Gesell and Woody have been 4 year starters and should be solid offensively. Remember how much Horner and Brunner improved throughout their careers? Remember how confident they were?
I remember watching Woody as a freshman with a nice little hook (both hands) and thinking he is going to be great in a couple years. His offensive game has gotten worse. Gesell should have all the confidence in the world but isn't aggressive offensively until the last minute of each half (makes no sense). Gesell hit 33 three pointers as a freshman, 29 as a sophomore, and then 16 the last 2 years. That makes zero sense.
They got better and improved. Iowa got worse and didn't improve....by a combined 49 points. Wow, what happened?