Early numbers are overwhelming. I wonder if the coaches feel that way.
I'm looking for Hockaday to step in, stay healthy and be this year's Cole Fisher.
I’ve been waiting for Jack for a long time...being behind Josey and not being healthy have kept him off the field imho... I recollect him stepping in for Josey during his suspension and looking pretty solid...I think he will be a guy that looks better when they are in game action....but time will tell.This is what I expect. I thought he looked solid. Also impressed by Welch, and Nick Niemann already looks like his brother out there. I’m cautiously optimistic about this group of linebackers.
Hockaday looks OK. He may be the better matchup against ISU, but I think Jones May be the better player against Wiscy and other power teams. Only 1game in, so hopefully improvements will be made. Perhaps Welch will end up back inside and Colbert will be on the outside. I am hopeful Jones will learn from the film and be the guy.
I felt uncomfortable just watching his discomfort.Jones looked lost when he was out there. Not sure if that was nerves or just inability to perform on the field. Hockaday looked much better. Welch and Niemann looked like gamers out there most of the day. Just remember that these guys are all inexperienced when it comes to real-time action and will improve immensely as the year goes on.
Whether its at the MIKE LB spot or at the SE WR spot ... don't you think that the coaches need to see a sampling of data at both spots in order to find the guy who proves to be the "right fit?"Folks seem to be OK with replacing the starting MLB after only one game, so why the reluctance by so many to replace the starting WR? There will never be any greater motivation for an athlete than to be benched and for the next guy to get a chance to win the job. And I think that's true of every position, not just MLB.
I could see this happening as well. With his background, NN probably knows this defense better then anyone, and could make sideline to sideline plays.I wish we would have worked Nieman at the middle. I think he’s our best LB and has the talent to be impactful there. Then we would slide Wade at LEO. Might be something to consider in the offseason.
I felt uncomfortable just watching his discomfort.
1st game jitters, allow time 2 figure it out!
Exactly. If anything give him his reps the following week vs UNI to get his job back.I think you have to go Hockaday for next week. He’s safer. ISU is going to spread Iowa out and make LBS play in space. Gap discipline and eye discipline are going to be paramount. And ISU has enough juice on offense to make us pay for being out of position. Based on that one quarter, I don’t trust Jones is going to be where he is supposed to be.
The other thing is I really wanted Jones to be our guy as a potential difference maker. He runs and hits like a ton of bricks which was evidenced by a massive 4th quarter tackle. Instinctually he’s clearly not there yet, but I hope he’s able to bounce back.I thought the same thing. They did a close up on him at one point as he was getting set and trying to coordinate the D. He definitely looked frazzled and an "oh shit" expression.
I felt bad because I know he was doing his best and trying so hard. Its like he was using a Dixie cup to bail out the Titanic.
Hockaday looks OK. He may be the better matchup against ISU, but I think Jones may be the better player against Wiscy and other power teams. Only 1game in, so hopefully improvements will be made. Perhaps Welch will end up back inside and Colbert will be on the outside. I am hopeful Jones will learn from the film and be the guy. It was not all Jones on the inside zone runs, our DTs got beat a few times too(Lattimore will help).
Because they play with nothing to loseI can appreciate that point, and many others have made it, but it sounds more like an excuse than a reason. Of the multitude of examples available, let's take just one: Appalachian State. Playing their season-opener at highly-ranked Penn State, the boys from Appalachian State played the home team to a 60-minute tie, only to lose in OT. Now think about it a minute: It's Appalachian State! They go into Happy Valley to open the season against mighty PSU and play them dead even. Only the advent of OT allows PSU to come away with a win.
In contrast, Iowa opens at home against a MAC team and makes just about every mistake in the book and leads by an embarrassing 3-0 at the half.
Some people might wonder how Appalachian State--again, just one of many, many examples--can go into Penn State and play so well while Iowa can't get out of its own way in Iowa City. Dropped passes, key penalties, a blocked punt, poor route running by the WRs, bad timing on passes....
So bottom line: why does Iowa always have first-game jitters and play poorly while little guys like Appalachian State seem to manage just fine?
Early numbers are overwhelming. I wonder if the coaches feel that way.
Is this too harsh? Scott used to work at the Gazette, then Land of 10; now he is with the Athletic.
Scott DochtermanVerified account@ScottDochterman 6h6 hours ago
In watching the LBs, Nick Niemann is a keeper. Played like his older brother. Welch got better as the game went on. MLB has some major issues. Jones had no idea where he was going. Hockaday wasn't as bad, but missed some tackles. Might be worth a revamp.
Because they play with nothing to lose
Conversly you might wonder if PSU played even more poorly then Iowa, allowing App State to be in the game?I can appreciate that point, and many others have made it, but it sounds more like an excuse than a reason. Of the multitude of examples available, let's take just one: Appalachian State. Playing their season-opener at highly-ranked Penn State, the boys from Appalachian State played the home team to a 60-minute tie, only to lose in OT. Now think about it a minute: It's Appalachian State! They go into Happy Valley to open the season against mighty PSU and play them dead even. Only the advent of OT allows PSU to come away with a win.
In contrast, Iowa opens at home against a MAC team and makes just about every mistake in the book and leads by an embarrassing 3-0 at the half.
Some people might wonder how Appalachian State--again, just one of many, many examples--can go into Penn State and play so well while Iowa can't get out of its own way in Iowa City. Dropped passes, key penalties, a blocked punt, poor route running by the WRs, bad timing on passes....
So bottom line: why does Iowa always have first-game jitters and play poorly while little guys like Appalachian State seem to manage just fine?