ADVERTISEMENT

Steele Dossier

For christs sakes forget it. Dwell on something more timely. And significant. Lots of more important shit happened then and since then that should raise your ire.


Why do you think it is insignificant that the FBI falsified evidence, broke DOJ and FISC standards in withholding exculpatory evidence, and utilized unverified opposition campaign ‘research’ to violate the 4th amendment rights of thousands of Americans?
Why should we just ‘forget it’?
It took exactly one administration for the Patriot Act surveillance powers to start being illegally used against political opposition.
I wasn’t surprised it happened, just how soon.
Those concerns are still timely because the government still holds these invasive powers, and unless you think the FBI is suddenly devoid of partisan and corrupt individuals this cloud hangs over our future elections as well.
I’m surprised how at peace some people are with the idea of American Stasi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tfxchawk
No, I’m concerned the FBI falsified evidence, and contravened DOJ procedures to introduce unverified information while hiding exculpatory information that they didn’t alter in order to induce the FISC to approve the use of the surveillance powers of the Patriot Act for members of the prior administration to spy on an opposition presidential candidate.
That’s not a small deal.
Are you familiar with the “two hop rule”?
Turns out your concerns are warranted. Also turns out the people ridiculing others for being conspiracy theorists were wrong, and need to wake up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
For the past four years, Democrats and the Washington media have suspended disbelief about the Steele dossier’s credibility by arguing that some Russia allegations against Donald Trump and his advisers have been corroborated and therefore the most explosive charges may also be true. But recently declassified secret testimony by the FBI official in charge of corroborating the dossier blows up that narrative.

The top analyst assigned to the FBI’s Russia “collusion” case, codenamed Crossfire Hurricane, admitted under oath that neither he nor his team of half a dozen intelligence analysts could confirm any of the allegations in the dossier — including ones the FBI nonetheless included in several warrant applications as evidence to establish legal grounds to electronically monitor a former Trump adviser for almost a year.

FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten made the admission under questioning by staff investigators for the Senate Judiciary Committee during closed-door testimony in October. The committee only this year declassified the transcript, albeit with a number of redactions including the name of Auten, who was identified by congressional sources who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“So with respect to the Steele reporting,” Auten told the committee, “the actual allegations and the actions described in those reports could not be corroborated.”

After years of digging, Auten conceded that the only material in the dossier that he could verify was information that was already publicly available, such as names, entities, and positions held by persons mentioned in the document.

His testimony, kept secret for several months, is eye-opening because it’s the first time anybody from the FBI has acknowledged headquarters failed to verify any of the dossier evidence supporting the wiretaps as true and correct.

As one of the FBI's leading experts on Russia, Auten was highly familiar with the subject matter of the dossier and the Russian players it cited. He also had a team of intelligence analysts at his disposal to pore over the material and chase down leads. They even traveled overseas to interview the dossier’s author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, and other sources.

Still, they could not corroborate any of the allegations of Trump-Russia “collusion" in the dossier, and actually debunked many of them — including the rumor, oft-repeated by the media, that Trump attorney Michael Cohen flew to Prague in the summer of 2016 to secretly huddle with Kremlin agents over an alleged Trump-Russia plot to hack the election. They determined that Cohen had never even been to the Czech Republic.

Yet Auten and his Crossfire teammates -- who referred to the dossier as “Crown material,” as if it were valuable intelligence from America’s closest ally, Britain -- never informed a secret surveillance court that the dossier was a bust. Instead, they used it as the basis for all four warrant applications to spy on Carter Page, a tangential 2016 Trump campaign adviser. Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who personally signed and approved the final application, has testified that without the dossier, the warrants could not have been obtained.

Financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 as opposition research against Trump, the dossier was used by the FBI to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrants to eavesdrop on Page from October 2016 to September 2017. A U.S. citizen, Page was accused of being a Russian agent, even though he previously assisted both the CIA and FBI in their efforts to hold Moscow in check. He was never charged with a crime and at least half the warrants have since been invalidated by the court.
Page is now suing the FBI, as well as Auten, among other individual defendants, and is seeking a total of $75 million in damages.

The bureau’s handling of the warrants is part of Special Counsel John Durham’s ongoing investigation into the government’s targeting of Trump and his campaign during the election, and later, the Trump presidency. In January, Durham secured a criminal conviction against top Crossfire lawyer Kevin Clinesmith for falsifying evidence against Page to help justify the last warrant issued in June 2017.

more at the link
So why you’re saying here is that Hillary’s campaign essentially colluded with the Russians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Finance85
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT