Stephen A. on misogyny
- Thread starter seminole97
- Start date
What did the men actually say that prompted Obama's response?
As usual, SAS misses the point.
He said "part of it makes me think that you just aren't feeling having a woman as president" and then there were murmurs of agreement.
He didn't say "you're ONLY not voting for her because she's a woman"
Try never to be as dumb as SAS.
He said "part of it makes me think that you just aren't feeling having a woman as president" and then there were murmurs of agreement.
He didn't say "you're ONLY not voting for her because she's a woman"
Try never to be as dumb as SAS.
Soooo...it IS acceptable to be opposed to Harris because she's a woman? Because that's all Obama said was unacceptable. If any of those extraneous (and flatly dumb) reasons enumerated by Smith are why they don't accept her...those weren't mentioned. But "policy"? C'mon Stephen...you gotta be kidding with that one.
Manufactured poutrage for clicks.
Manufactured poutrage for clicks.
You just described OPs posting style.
Stephen A. said nothing on misogyny and started a one-way conversation that had nothing to do with Obama’s point.
It would be nice if we could actually have a fruitful discussion on the important issues Stephen A. brought up. Unfortunately, we don’t have a serious election because one side is represented by a circus clown who is not a serious adult and has no actual policies of his own other than claiming to be the antidote to transgender prisoners and illegal immigration. I do not want that lunatic in charge of foreign policy or having access to launch codes when he is already insane and clearly in a diminished state.
Give me a serious Republican candidate, and I will proudly and enthusiastically vote for him or her. Until then, GTFO. Harris is the only viable choice.
The neocons have fed us a steady diet of failed wars for over two decades.
When do you get tired of it?
Similar threads
