Depends on what you mean by "good thing," I guess. I'd LOVE to play OSU, Mich, PSU, Oregon and USC every year or almost every year. I've said it many times, our program was stronger when they regularly had a tough schedule.
That's a very debatable topic...........one I'd rather not feed Husker lurkers' egos on.
Fact is, Iowa's schedule remains steadfast in maintaining some semblance of tradition rather than throwing it all away for the sake of big market TV games pandering to the most casual f***-faced viewers possible.............
They weren't going to get all that closer to playing Michigan and Ohio State more often anyway (even if they didn't get to keep their 3 rivalry games) because of conference expansion, and that will only further become an "issue" if they add any more teams, say from the ACC.
Iowa's schedule was NEVER going to be some variation of:
Noncon
ISU At Alabama/Notre Dame/Florida State/Texas
Noncon
USC
Penn State
Michigan State
Wisconsin
Ohio State
Washington
Michigan
UCLA
Nebraska
And obviously it will never look even remotely close to this, but the point is that it never would have either, even if we didn't get to keep Minnesota, Nebraska and Wisconsin as "annual" games.
Nor will Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State's schedules.
It's just not possible with the number of teams, unless the conference intentionally pairs their perceived top teams together more often to boost the conference's viewership, notoriety, and CFP resume strength in terms of being perceived as maintaining that P2 status that people want to shout from under the table.................
Hope that helps!
![Big Grin :D :D]()