I say Rasheed starts at 174PSU poster (jtothemfp) on BWI posted a pretty interesting tidbit regarding their 174-197 situation from credible sources.
_____________________________________________________________________________
"
Since it's clear to me now I'll never get a BSD post written about it...here's the info I got, from 3 different highly credible sources. For each bullet, first number = number of confirmed sources and second number = my confidence in its validity, out of 10:
Here are some personal guesses / takes from all of that:
- Nickal only certified at 184, cannot compete collegiately at 174 at all this season. (3 / 10)
- McCutcheon certified at 174. His minimum allowed weight is 174.0. On the dot. (2 / 10)
- McCutcheon & Nickal will wrestle off for 184 next week, 10/18 - 10/20. (2 / 10)
- Morelli certified at 174, but not 165. (1 / 9)
- Cassar hasn't been cleared to compete (1 / 10)
- Nickal winning 184 is not at all automatic
- I'd guess Cael is....let's call it disappointed... with Nickal for not certing at 174
- Probably also pissed at Morelli for not certing at 165
- Very curious how Cael manages this situation--even more so if McCutcheon wins whatever the coaches structure the wrestleoffs as, across three days. Although then my curiosity will include how Nickal manages the situation
- McCutcheon cutting to 174 would be brutal af, but is still considered realistically viable--for now--by himself and the coaches
- If Nickal wins, McCutcheon will probably try to cut to 174 and compete there in Reno. I'm curious af to picture what cutting to 174.0, but not to 173.9 looks like
- Cassar may not be cleared all year
- For 197, if Nickal wins, I'd guess Stout will start the season. If McCutcheon wins, I'd guess Nickal will start the season
- I'd guess McCutcheon *can* make 174 for Reno, but will be so uncomfortable that he'll abandon it before season's end."
_______________________________________________________________________
This tells me that PSU's lineup is still kind of a big question mark from 174-197. Obviously Bo is going to be good wherever he goes, but I mean regarding to which weight class everyone is going. Personally, I thought PSU's strongest lineup was with Bo at 174 for one more year, but this helps us a bit IMO.
You have Sorensen losing to Micah Jordan?
Does this remind anyone else of the Bubba Jenkins situation? I guess Nickal is lucky that McCutchen isn't Cael's brother.PSU poster (jtothemfp) on BWI posted a pretty interesting tidbit regarding their 174-197 situation from credible sources.
_____________________________________________________________________________
"
Since it's clear to me now I'll never get a BSD post written about it...here's the info I got, from 3 different highly credible sources. For each bullet, first number = number of confirmed sources and second number = my confidence in its validity, out of 10:
Here are some personal guesses / takes from all of that:
- Nickal only certified at 184, cannot compete collegiately at 174 at all this season. (3 / 10)
- McCutcheon certified at 174. His minimum allowed weight is 174.0. On the dot. (2 / 10)
- McCutcheon & Nickal will wrestle off for 184 next week, 10/18 - 10/20. (2 / 10)
- Morelli certified at 174, but not 165. (1 / 9)
- Cassar hasn't been cleared to compete (1 / 10)
- Nickal winning 184 is not at all automatic
- I'd guess Cael is....let's call it disappointed... with Nickal for not certing at 174
- Probably also pissed at Morelli for not certing at 165
- Very curious how Cael manages this situation--even more so if McCutcheon wins whatever the coaches structure the wrestleoffs as, across three days. Although then my curiosity will include how Nickal manages the situation
- McCutcheon cutting to 174 would be brutal af, but is still considered realistically viable--for now--by himself and the coaches
- If Nickal wins, McCutcheon will probably try to cut to 174 and compete there in Reno. I'm curious af to picture what cutting to 174.0, but not to 173.9 looks like
- Cassar may not be cleared all year
- For 197, if Nickal wins, I'd guess Stout will start the season. If McCutcheon wins, I'd guess Nickal will start the season
- I'd guess McCutcheon *can* make 174 for Reno, but will be so uncomfortable that he'll abandon it before season's end."
_______________________________________________________________________
This tells me that PSU's lineup is still kind of a big question mark from 174-197. Obviously Bo is going to be good wherever he goes, but I mean regarding to which weight class everyone is going. Personally, I thought PSU's strongest lineup was with Bo at 174 for one more year, but this helps us a bit IMO.
I will second cradleking in the assessment you are having trouble with the distinction between rankings and projections. You want projections these are rankings. I would say to everyone that if you don't want to read rankings then don't.they can be the same thing. It's semantics that separates them. In reality, they are the same. Ranking a guy #1 says that you project them to be #1 at the end of the year. If that is not true, then why do it? Who cares that you rank a guy #1 in October. I want the best assessment as to who the best is by end of year.
- This tells me that PSU's lineup is still kind of a big question mark from 174-197. Obviously Bo is going to be good wherever he goes, but I mean regarding to which weight class everyone is going. Personally, I thought PSU's strongest lineup was with Bo at 174 for one more year, but this helps us a bit IMO.
Can't wait to hear you reasoning for it? Make it quick, I want to sleep tonight.You think that PSU being ranked 6th is evidence of PSU bias by Flo? And that it is all an elaborate plan for Flo to praise the almighty Cael when the team does better than 6th? Take off the tinfoil hat and step away from the keyboard.
You convinced me. No reading rankings for me, I'll just use my own common sense (my 1st tidbit.............. PSU won't finish 6th........).I will second cradleking in the assessment you are having trouble with the distinction between rankings and projections. You want projections these are rankings. I would say to everyone that if you don't want to read rankings then don't.
Guys, c'mon.
anyone complaining about the team rankings don't know how the process works. blame the process (i do) not the results of it.
the team rankings are nothing more than the projected ncaa tournament points (sans bonus) based on the individual rankings.
so either 1) criticize the individual rankings 2) criticize this method 3) accept that team rankings won't come close to an accurate picture until a month or more into the season.
(also, where in the hell did i ever downplay the quality of recruits that psu brings in?)
(also 2x - CP sucks)
I know the difference. I think it's silly to have both is what I'm saying. That's outdated thinking imo. We have made great tech advances that allow us to evaluate guys in real time and quickly at that. Evaluating freshmen is just as much a crapshoot as sophs, juniors, and seniors.I will second cradleking in the assessment you are having trouble with the distinction between rankings and projections. You want projections these are rankings. I would say to everyone that if you don't want to read rankings then don't.
They aren't evaluating, they are taking real results and comparing them. HS results don't count. RS victories over low ranked wrestlers don't count. If you want CP to put up predictions he should definitely add the caveat that they will be wrong. Its really hard to project the AAs after the brackets have been made, impossible now. Where do they have both? Its just rankings. Nobody is listed based on what they think will happen.I know the difference. I think it's silly to have both is what I'm saying. That's outdated thinking imo. We have made great tech advances that allow us to evaluate guys in real time and quickly at that. Evaluating freshmen is just as much a crapshoot as sophs, juniors, and seniors.
That's my point. I'd like them to order guys in preseason to what they think will happen. Leaving Spencer Lee out just because he's a freshman is asinine when his resume screams something else. There is ample evidence that Spencer could compete on day one. So why not recognize it?They aren't evaluating, they are taking real results and comparing them. HS results don't count. RS victories over low ranked wrestlers don't count. If you want CP to put up predictions he should definitely add the caveat that they will be wrong. Its really hard to project the AAs after the brackets have been made, impossible now. Where do they have both? Its just rankings. Nobody is listed based on what they think will happen.
Except that I haven't seen them, nor do I care to see them -- just heard about how baseless they are.Because it gets people to start doing exactly what everyone is doing-reading their article, and talking about it. The only one that matters will come out early March, right after conference tourneys.
Yes. They're not unranked because they are freshman; they're unranked because they don't have quality folkstyle wins over anybody at this level.
You really don't understand the difference between a ranking and a projection?
Oh, I do indeed. I just think it's quaint when people use past practice without any regard to exceptions or new practices. It's how mistakes are repeated over and over again. If you know something is likely incorrect, change it. Simple concept. It isn't like they are batting a 1,000 on those with histories, so why not take your best shot?
CP knows his rankings are incorrect, so why not make them better by changing how you make preseason rankings? To write an article essentially admitting that you're looking past the elephants in the room is silly thinking imo.
To state you know the difference between projections and rankings then post to the contrary is kinda funny.they can be the same thing. It's semantics that separates them. In reality, they are the same. Ranking a guy #1 says that you project them to be #1 at the end of the year. If that is not true, then why do it? Who cares that you rank a guy #1 in October. I want the best assessment as to who the best is by end of year.
He is really dense.To state you know the difference between projections and rankings then post to the contrary is kinda funny.
ok, you skipped the reading part! Just remember, reading is the most important skill you learn in school-except for maybe social activities under the bleachers!Except that I haven't seen them, nor do I care to see them -- just heard about how baseless they are.![]()
Boom. 1st place wins this thread.Does this remind anyone else of the Bubba Jenkins situation? I guess Nickal is lucky that McCutchen isn't Cael's brother.
I really enjoyed the Flo poking fun at WIN era.Didn't Pyles kind of poke fun at WIN putting PSU 7th?
So Lee and Hall will rightfully be unranked because someone said you can't rank freshmen? Even though many say they could already AA as high school kids?
----How about using common sense with preseason rankings, and just give it your best shot. If the HS world beaters continue their winning ways on the next level, we'll know soon enough, and adjustments to the rankings can be made. That would make the preseason rankings more meaningful than the rigid, brain dead method that FLO seemed to have used.
I think some kids have earned rankings based on reports out of various rooms across the nation. They have beaten some ranked guys.
#LegendsOfThePracticeRoom