Of course not for so very many reasons, but the big ones:
A) It is a medical decision, which should be protected by all sorts of great reasons for confidentiality.
B) It isn't that simple of a determination, it isn't a form with 3 check boxes. There are no "good" vs. "bad" reasons, there is a person weighing their criteria (whatever they may be) with their options and making a decision. That decision may be silly to some of us: "I don't want to stretch out my vagina," but why should that not be a legitimate, non-"convenience" concern? We raise concerns like that to our doctors all the time.
C) Someone would have to determine what "good" is. I would like to think we would trust one of our most trusted professions - Doctors ... but they are the ones doing these, within their ethics, in the first place. So by requiring outside oversight we would necessarily be discounting the opinion of those trusted doctors.
Lastly, you are asking the guy that thinks the 2A is unequivocal and should apply for felons as well.
