Texas House advances bill that would require armed personnel on school campuses
The legislation is a GOP priority following the 2022 school shooting in Uvalde. But some Texas Democrats oppose the measure, arguing more guns in schools isn’t a logical solution.
www.keranews.org
House Bill 3 by state Rep. Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, would allow a district's board of trustees to determine the actual number of armed officers for each school, but at least one would need to be present during school hours. The proposal would also task the Texas Education Agency with ensuring compliance with the provisions in the legislation, including performing onsite audits that could be conducted at random.
Burrows, who chaired the special committee that investigated the 2022 Uvalde shooting where 19 students and two teachers were killed, explained the legislation should be considered separately from the debate over law enforcement's botched reaction to the shooting.
Were HB 3 to become law, a district could be found in noncompliance if it didn't submit to the monitoring or didn't address concerns raised by the TEA in "a reasonable time" according to the bill's analysis. A student who attends a school in a non-compliant district could receive a grant to attend school elsewhere, and any superintendent or other administrator fired because of district noncompliance wouldn't be eligible for severance pay.
Click to shrink...
The bill has some bipartisan support. State Reps. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, and Tracy King, D-Batesville, signed on as joint authors.
The legislation was included on the list of Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan's priority bills released earlier this session. But some Democrats opposed the measure on the grounds that having more guns in schools would be counterproductive to the purported goals of the legislation.
Click to shrink...
According to the language of the bill, an armed officer would be required to be "a school district peace officer, school resource officer, a commissioned peace officer employed as security personnel, a school marshal, or a district employee." But the officer could also be someone who "had completed school safety training provided by a qualified handgun instructor certified in school safety; and carried a handgun on the employee's person while on school premises."
Click to shrink...
"We don't want those guns in our classrooms. Teachers themselves do not want to be armed, we know that," she said, citing a poll by the Texas American Federation of Teachers poll that found 77% of those asked opposed arming teachers. "We should be taking into consideration how our teachers, parents and students feel about staff being armed before mandating this across the state."
Ramos tried unsuccessfully to amend the bill to exclude teachers, but Burrows opposed the modification, saying it creates a "false narrative" that the legislation forces teachers to be armed.
Click to shrink...
Later in Monday's debate, state Rep. Vicki Goodwin, D-Austin, offered an amendment that would have required trigger locks on weapons brought onto campuses under Burrows' legislation. She cited several examples of why she felt the added safety precaution is needed, including a 2019 incident in Bowie County where a Pleasant Grove ISD employee's loaded gunwas left on a school bus and found by a student.
Burrows said that decision could be left up to individual school districts and opposed the amendment, which also failed.
"I have absolutely no problem with trigger locks however I don't know their availability," he said, calling the amendment "absolutely unnecessary."
The legislation ultimately passed 122-19 and faces one more procedural vote before it is eligible for consideration by the Texas Senate.