ADVERTISEMENT

The case against each B1G contender

HeRKeYHoPeFuL

HB MVP
Dec 5, 2007
2,208
1,013
113
With 5 teams projected to go 13-7 // 12-8 based on KenPom, I took a look through their stats to see what stands out and why each may fail. In order of current standings:

Michigan (4-0)
Their offense revolves around a freshman. That isn't ideal. Hunter Dickinson looks good so far, but while Austin Davis is sidelined, they don't have a true backup center. They also seem to play more inside the arc than the Michigan teams under Beilein. This makes me wonder if they aren't really built to play from behind, as they don't have as many options to stretch the floor and score quickly. Michigan is my most vulnerable contender, as their 2-0 has come against Penn St. and Nebraska, who are a combined... 0-4.

Update: Dickinson is looking really good, although most of the pieces of games I've caught have been wide open dunks as teams leave him to help on defense. Combined opponent B1G record: 4-13

Illinois (4-1)
Illinois is good. Very good, according to their adjusted efficiency margin (+23.97 pts/100). With Kofi Cockburn in the middle and Ayo Dosunmu on the perimeter, it's hard to find a lot of flaws with this team. However, I think they look better than they actually are. Through 10 games, Illinois is shooting 42.6% from beyond the arc. Did a team that shot 30% last year suddenly find their stroke? I'm not so sure. I'm willing to accept that they may be a better shooting team this year, but looking at their players, let's see how they're shooting so far:
Ayo Dosunmu: 2020 - 44.4%; career (including 2020) - 34.3%
Da'Monte Williams: 2020 - 69.6%; career - 33.8%
They also have Giorgi Bezhanishvili at 2/2 and Trent Frazier shooting 40.9% (career 36.2%); so are they truly good shooters, or are they just on a heater to start the year? I think it's more likely that this team will be closer to 35% than 40% by the end of the year.

Update: In their only game since the original post, they shot 35% (7/20) from 3. Combined B1G opponent records: 10-13

Rutgers (3-3)
Similar to Illinois, I think Rutgers is just starting on a bit of a shooting heater... here are their shooters:
Ron Harper Jr: 2020 - 50%, career 35%
Jacob Young: 2020- 40%, career 27%
Montez Mathis: 2020 - 39.4%, career 29.6%
Paul Mulcahy: 2020 - 38.5%, career 31.4%
The Scarlet Knights also aren't a good free throw shooting team (62.4% overall), but in a 5 point win over Purdue they shot 82.4% and in their upset over Illinois they shot 69.4%. Will they continue to get their better free throw performances in close games that make the difference between wins and losses?

Update: 0/2 week for Rutgers with a combined 10-29 from the FT line. Combined B1G opponent records: 14-15

Iowa (3-1)
Defense, defense, defense. We know we can score, and we know about Luka Garza, but can we actually defend good offensive teams? We're currently 11th of 14 B1G teams in conference play, and hovering in the 90s for nationwide efficiency.

Update: Up to 9th in B1G defensive efficiency. Combined B1G opponent records: 11-10

Wisconsin (3-1)
I think we'll know a lot more about Wisconsin after their game against Minnesota on NYE. They are 2-1, but their wins are against Nebraska and Michigan St. (combined 0-5). They've also suffered a home loss already. While this is a solid team all around (as almost all Wisconsin teams are), they aren't great at winning the close games. Teams that can stick around with Wisconsin have been able to deliver, but in their wins, they just grind teams away with their slow pace and execution. What happens when they have to play catch up? Can they do anything other than grind the game to a halt? They also only go 7-8 deep, so what happens if any of their contributors get COVID?

Update: In a pretty non-competitive game against Minnesota, Wisconsin looks the part of a contender, although they did allow the final margin to shrink to 12. Combined B1G opponent records: 6-13
 
Last edited:
Northwestern and Minnesota are projected to go 9-11 and 10-10 respectively. While I think they both overachieve that, they aren't in the same tier as the teams I discussed.
Northwestern and Minnesota are teams that will play spoiler to many of the contenders, as we saw in our game with the Gophers. But on the flip side, like we saw last night, they also do not have the depth to consistently beat the top contenders.

Scheduling also did both no favors, as they face the full brunt of their conference schedule over the next 8 games or so, and are probably the toughest schedules for any Big Ten team in that stretch.

The other team not mentioned, but you have to mention them until they are truly dead and buried 6 feet under, is Michigan State.

Sure they are struggling right now, and I don't see a single person on that team that can guard Garza 1 on 1, which is saying something for a program like Michigan State, but it's still Tom Izzo and it's still Michigan State. So just like the New England Patriots this year, don't count them out until they are truly finished.......................and then let's all celebrate! :D :D :D :D
 
Good stuff. Still think we have a very good chance of winning this thing. Illini probably the worst matchup for us with their really good and quick backcourt, but not sure the others are built for the grind besides Wisconsin, who already now has a home loss.
 
Good stuff. Still think we have a very good chance of winning this thing. Illini probably the worst matchup for us with their really good and quick backcourt, but not sure the others are built for the grind besides Wisconsin, who already now has a home loss.

Wisconsin always seems to have a WTF loss early in the year then they just keep getting better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksfinal4
Recruiting not considered for obvious reasons (otherwise Howard would be higher). Just on a prep and in-game coaching basis, I would rate the staffs like this:

1. Gard
2. Pikiell
3. Underwood
4. McCaffery
5. Howard
Izzo
.
.
..
.
The rest and it ain't close.
 
You clearly missed the point. There’s 5 schools we are comparing that are predicted to be at the top of the league. Michigan St and Izzo are not predicted to be there. Clearly he’s the best coach in the league over the last 20 years but that’s not what anyone is talking about. Except you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raptorpeeps
You clearly missed the point. There’s 5 schools we are comparing that are predicted to be at the top of the league. Michigan St and Izzo are not predicted to be there. Clearly he’s the best coach in the league over the last 20 years but that’s not what anyone is talking about. Except you.
Those are the tp teams NOW. Who's to say MSU won't be there at the end? Thats my point.
 
Those are the tp teams NOW. Who's to say MSU won't be there at the end? Thats my point.
I asked the same question basically only above it Northwestern and Ohio State but the op clarified by stating as I understand that it was based on Ken Pom and current standings of those 5 teams.
I expect there will be changes in both but currently it was a well pointed out and thoughtful interpretation as I see it today
 
Those are the tp teams NOW. Who's to say MSU won't be there at the end? Thats my point.

T-rank currently projects them 13th in the league with a 7-13 record.

If MSU can start 0-3 and still win the league this year, that would be among Izzo’s most impressive accomplishments to date. Bar none.

You could probably get historic odds on that proposition bet. The last time MSU started the conference 0-3 was’02-‘03, and they ended up finishing 3d. They might very well still finish first in a league with ten tourney teams. lol. Go for it, you keen analyst, you.
 
Last edited:
I asked the same question basically only above it Northwestern and Ohio State but the op clarified by stating as I understand that it was based on Ken Pom and current standings of those 5 teams.
I expect there will be changes in both but currently it was a well pointed out and thoughtful interpretation as I see it today
It's KenPom's projected standings. And like with T-rank, KenPom has MSU below .500. The B1G is loaded, and MSU is down this year. It's a dogfight between Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois at the top, with Michigan and Rutgers close behind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
T-rank currently projects them 13th in the league with a 7-13 record.

If MSU can start 0-3 and still win the league this year, that would be among Izzo’s most impressive accomplishments to date. Bar none.

You could probably get historic odds on that proposition bet. The last time MSU started the conference 0-3 was’02-‘03, and they ended up finishing 3d. They might very well still finish first in a league with ten tourney teams. lol. Go for it, you keen analyst, you.

CheeryEasygoingBeauceron-small.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raptorpeeps
Izzo is a great coach because great coaches have great players. The 20-21 version of MSU seems to be lacking those to some degree. His last two recruiting classes, with the exception of Watts, have not been big time contributors yet. His best player is the transfer Hauser and I would bet he thought he was joining a team that would be having much more success. There is plenty of season left so it's still possible Sparty gets back on their feet, but starting 0-3 is a deep hole given how tough the league schedule will be. They still have Rutgers twice as well as Michigan, Purdue, Ohio St. and Iowa plus a home game with Illinois. There are surely some losses upcoming.
 
Last edited:
I've updated the original post based on recent games. Opponent B1G records are really interesting...

Rutgers now projected to go 10-10, so that FT% may get them removed from the list sooner rather than later.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT