They will not be a conference champion yet again; priority for the CFP should go to conference champions just like the committee has stated consistently since last year.
Some may argue that they are playing 5 ACC games; well, one, Clemson appears to be running away with the ACC; two, Notre Dame lost to Clemson; and three, Notre Dame is not a full member playing a full conference schedule and therefore will not win a conference championship.
I am sick and tired of hearing that we have 4 playoff slots for 6 possibilities (the 5 power conferences and Notre Dame). Once Notre Dame joins a conference and proves they can win a conference chapionship, then they have a right to argue that they belong in the CFP.
Thoughts? Or do we just bow down to Notre Dame and give them whatever they want?
Some may argue that they are playing 5 ACC games; well, one, Clemson appears to be running away with the ACC; two, Notre Dame lost to Clemson; and three, Notre Dame is not a full member playing a full conference schedule and therefore will not win a conference championship.
I am sick and tired of hearing that we have 4 playoff slots for 6 possibilities (the 5 power conferences and Notre Dame). Once Notre Dame joins a conference and proves they can win a conference chapionship, then they have a right to argue that they belong in the CFP.
Thoughts? Or do we just bow down to Notre Dame and give them whatever they want?