One aspect of sports that I always find fascinating is the mental aspect attached to good and bad performances.
So often responses to threads go in this order:
Initial statement of confidence: "Iowa rolls in this one. 25+ plus!"
Response of alarm: "Be careful to get too confident."
Logical rebuttal: "I don't think me being overconfident will affect the players."
Of course the last response is correct. We posters do not magically influence the players; however, I do think the general attitude of the fan base can give a hint as to the mental state of the team itself.
That being written, the general overwhelming confidence attached to the Indiana and Minny games had me a little worried.
So, am I off base? Do the attitudes of the fans ( or in this case, posters) offer a reflection of the general readiness and confidence of the actual team? A market forecast of sorts, if you will?
So often responses to threads go in this order:
Initial statement of confidence: "Iowa rolls in this one. 25+ plus!"
Response of alarm: "Be careful to get too confident."
Logical rebuttal: "I don't think me being overconfident will affect the players."
Of course the last response is correct. We posters do not magically influence the players; however, I do think the general attitude of the fan base can give a hint as to the mental state of the team itself.
That being written, the general overwhelming confidence attached to the Indiana and Minny games had me a little worried.
So, am I off base? Do the attitudes of the fans ( or in this case, posters) offer a reflection of the general readiness and confidence of the actual team? A market forecast of sorts, if you will?