ADVERTISEMENT

The polar vortex will soon hit the U.S.

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,149
61,920
113
January has already been colder than average in most states east of the Rocky Mountains for the first time in two years — and now, more frigid air is coming.
A lobe of the polar vortex, a stormy ring that typically keeps the coldest air locked up near the North Pole, will dip southward into the United States this weekend into next week.


Want to know how your actions can help make a difference for our planet? Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter, in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday.

Polar air masses from Siberia are forecast to arrive in the northern Rockies on Saturday, before rapidly moving south and east and encompassing much of the United States by Monday.
This will spell dangerously cold temperatures — as cold as minus-20 to minus-30 in some states — and raises the potential for new storms to form as the icy air clashes with the warm, moist air of the Gulf of Mexico and the western Atlantic Ocean.

Arctic blast element
0:09

The biggest Arctic blast of winter so far will hit the United States next week. Data source: ECMWF/ERA5. (Video: Ben Noll)
After a slow start to the snow season in December, parts of more than 15 states now have twice their average season-to-date snowfall. This comes after two big winter storms crossed the country during early January.


More storms over the next week could add to these notable snow totals.

Where it could be stormy​

A disturbance may form along the Mid-Atlantic coast on Sunday and could cause a snowy end to the weekend for areas from Washington, D.C., to Boston.
🌱
Follow Climate & environment
While it’s not expected to be a lot of precipitation, enough snow may fall to make shoveling and plowing necessary. Temperatures on Sunday night will be in the teens across the same region. If it snows, icy spots could linger into the Monday morning commute. In D.C., early forecasts suggest Monday’s presidential inauguration could be the coldest since 2009. There’s also a chance that it will be the windiest inauguration in 40 years.

Forecast details depend on how quickly a cold front moves along the Eastern Seaboard over the weekend.
Faster movement will cause the storm to form farther offshore and cause little impact, while slower movement will cause the storm to form farther inland and feature more widespread snow.

There will be several more chances for storms to develop next week.
On Monday, heavy lake-effect snow could develop near the Great Lakes, lingering for a few days.
Meanwhile, another snowstorm may form in Colorado, New Mexico and the southern Plains. This system has the potential to evolve into a major winter weather-maker for Texas and the Deep South from Monday through Wednesday, spreading snow and ice unusually far south.

Places that were affected by last week’s winter storm, such as Dallas and Atlanta, could be hit by more wintry weather in the week ahead.
With the storm’s puzzle pieces still thousands of miles away from the United States in the Arctic, it will be a few more days before forecast details become clearer.
Early indications are that February may turn out to be a snowier-than-normal month for many Northern states.

How cold it may get​

More than 105 million people in the United States could experience subzero temperatures in the next two weeks — covering around 40 states.

The most unusually cold air in the Northern Hemisphere will move into the Plains and Midwest this weekend as the polar vortex lobe zaps the country like a jellyfish tentacle.

Temperatures may be as low as minus-20 to minus-30 in parts of Idaho, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan on Monday and/or Tuesday morning.
Although conditions will be undeniably frigid, low-temperature records in the area are even colder. The record low in Minneapolis and Fargo, North Dakota, on Jan. 21 is minus-41, set back in 1888. These, and others, are unlikely to be broken.
On Wednesday, the Arctic air mass will probably be centered near the East Coast, possibly causing the coldest temperatures of the winter so far from Detroit to Washington, D.C., and Boston.
And it won’t just be the air temperatures — the wind chill will make it dangerously cold. Wind chill temperatures of minus-30 to minus-40 may occur in parts of the northern Plains and Upper Midwest early next week.


Frostbite is possible in 10 to 20 minutes on exposed skin under such harsh conditions. Any drop in temperature to this level can be dangerous and deadly, and associated risks should be taken seriously, especially for vulnerable populations. In its outlook about the cold weather, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said expected temperatures pose “a great risk of hypothermia and frostbite to exposed skin.”
By Wednesday morning, wind chills could range from minus-10 to minus-20 in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
Just another way to scare the public. "Polar vortex".... Its cold air. We got it in the twin cities every late January - early Feb.
And then naming all the winter storms.... The Weather channel started in 2012. What a scam trying to scare the public.
Best is when they say 105 million people will experience it. Yes, a 1/3 of the nation will feel some cold air. Hopefully the homeless seek shelter/prepare and parents dress their children appropriately.
 
Looking forward to:

9gsys3.gif
 
No snow to scare the old ladies from watching the local news so all we got is … “it’s cold out”.

I am confused and hope the news stations have a reporter standing outside saying it is cold and stating some cars are not starting. Damn that’s information I need.
 
We've gotten practically no snow in Iowa so far, and what little snow cover we currently have may melt tomorrow and Friday.

That is going to limit just how cold it'll get here. It's going to be a lot worse where there's actual snow cover right now.

Last year this time we had 2 feet of snow on the ground, followed by a true PV. Remember how cold it got then?
 
A polar vortex sounds much more frightening than either "climate change", "Covid," or "bird flu". And definitely more frightening than 'winter storm warning', 'winter weather advisory,' or 'snowstorm".

I have to say, the weather adjectives this season have been particularly over the top. In the last go-round of storms a week or two ago, I recall seeing words like "deadly" being used prospectively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
We've gotten practically no snow in Iowa so far, and what little snow cover we currently have may melt tomorrow and Friday.

That is going to limit just how cold it'll get here. It's going to be a lot worse where there's actual snow cover right now.

Last year this time we had 2 feet of snow on the ground, followed by a true PV. Remember how cold it got then?
my Ariens snow thrower just collecting dust in the garage
 
We've gotten practically no snow in Iowa so far, and what little snow cover we currently have may melt tomorrow and Friday.

That is going to limit just how cold it'll get here. It's going to be a lot worse where there's actual snow cover right now.

Last year this time we had 2 feet of snow on the ground, followed by a true PV. Remember how cold it got then?
No, I only remember the snow.
I remember was probably somewhere between 2019-21 in twin cities where temps hit -25 or so then claimed -55 wind chill. Schools were cancelled and some night time activities were cancelled.
 
Just another way to scare the public. "Polar vortex".... Its cold air. We got it in the twin cities every late January - early Feb.
And then naming all the winter storms.... The Weather channel started in 2012. What a scam trying to scare the public.
Best is when they say 105 million people will experience it. Yes, a 1/3 of the nation will feel some cold air. Hopefully the homeless seek shelter/prepare and parents dress their children appropriately.

What is supposed to be scaring the public? Naming winter storms? Or are those the scams? Who is profiting from the scams?

I'm not even sure what exactly you're alleging, or who you're accusing of doing it, I'd be curious if you'd flush it out a bit.
 
January has already been colder than average in most states east of the Rocky Mountains for the first time in two years — and now, more frigid air is coming.
A lobe of the polar vortex, a stormy ring that typically keeps the coldest air locked up near the North Pole, will dip southward into the United States this weekend into next week.


Want to know how your actions can help make a difference for our planet? Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter, in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday.

Polar air masses from Siberia are forecast to arrive in the northern Rockies on Saturday, before rapidly moving south and east and encompassing much of the United States by Monday.
This will spell dangerously cold temperatures — as cold as minus-20 to minus-30 in some states — and raises the potential for new storms to form as the icy air clashes with the warm, moist air of the Gulf of Mexico and the western Atlantic Ocean.

Arctic blast element
0:09

The biggest Arctic blast of winter so far will hit the United States next week. Data source: ECMWF/ERA5. (Video: Ben Noll)
After a slow start to the snow season in December, parts of more than 15 states now have twice their average season-to-date snowfall. This comes after two big winter storms crossed the country during early January.


More storms over the next week could add to these notable snow totals.

Where it could be stormy​

A disturbance may form along the Mid-Atlantic coast on Sunday and could cause a snowy end to the weekend for areas from Washington, D.C., to Boston.
🌱
Follow Climate & environment
While it’s not expected to be a lot of precipitation, enough snow may fall to make shoveling and plowing necessary. Temperatures on Sunday night will be in the teens across the same region. If it snows, icy spots could linger into the Monday morning commute. In D.C., early forecasts suggest Monday’s presidential inauguration could be the coldest since 2009. There’s also a chance that it will be the windiest inauguration in 40 years.

Forecast details depend on how quickly a cold front moves along the Eastern Seaboard over the weekend.
Faster movement will cause the storm to form farther offshore and cause little impact, while slower movement will cause the storm to form farther inland and feature more widespread snow.

There will be several more chances for storms to develop next week.
On Monday, heavy lake-effect snow could develop near the Great Lakes, lingering for a few days.
Meanwhile, another snowstorm may form in Colorado, New Mexico and the southern Plains. This system has the potential to evolve into a major winter weather-maker for Texas and the Deep South from Monday through Wednesday, spreading snow and ice unusually far south.

Places that were affected by last week’s winter storm, such as Dallas and Atlanta, could be hit by more wintry weather in the week ahead.
With the storm’s puzzle pieces still thousands of miles away from the United States in the Arctic, it will be a few more days before forecast details become clearer.
Early indications are that February may turn out to be a snowier-than-normal month for many Northern states.

How cold it may get​

More than 105 million people in the United States could experience subzero temperatures in the next two weeks — covering around 40 states.

The most unusually cold air in the Northern Hemisphere will move into the Plains and Midwest this weekend as the polar vortex lobe zaps the country like a jellyfish tentacle.

Temperatures may be as low as minus-20 to minus-30 in parts of Idaho, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan on Monday and/or Tuesday morning.
Although conditions will be undeniably frigid, low-temperature records in the area are even colder. The record low in Minneapolis and Fargo, North Dakota, on Jan. 21 is minus-41, set back in 1888. These, and others, are unlikely to be broken.
On Wednesday, the Arctic air mass will probably be centered near the East Coast, possibly causing the coldest temperatures of the winter so far from Detroit to Washington, D.C., and Boston.
And it won’t just be the air temperatures — the wind chill will make it dangerously cold. Wind chill temperatures of minus-30 to minus-40 may occur in parts of the northern Plains and Upper Midwest early next week.


Frostbite is possible in 10 to 20 minutes on exposed skin under such harsh conditions. Any drop in temperature to this level can be dangerous and deadly, and associated risks should be taken seriously, especially for vulnerable populations. In its outlook about the cold weather, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said expected temperatures pose “a great risk of hypothermia and frostbite to exposed skin.”
By Wednesday morning, wind chills could range from minus-10 to minus-20 in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.

Trump’s fault!
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
What is supposed to be scaring the public? Naming winter storms? Or are those the scams? Who is profiting from the scams?

I'm not even sure what exactly you're alleging, or who you're accusing of doing it, I'd be curious if you'd flush it out a bit.
I was about to type a similar thing. Polar Vortex is an actual thing, not some scary made up term for cold weather in the United States. No clue what he's trying to get at.

 
A polar vortex sounds much more frightening than either "climate change", "Covid," or "bird flu". And definitely more frightening than 'winter storm warning', 'winter weather advisory,' or 'snowstorm".

I have to say, the weather adjectives this season have been particularly over the top. In the last go-round of storms a week or two ago, I recall seeing words like "deadly" being used prospectively.
Just wait for that BOMB CYCLONE!!!!!
 
my Ariens snow thrower just collecting dust in the garage
Mine sucks. Brand new and it wouldn’t start last year so I couldn’t use it the three times we actually got snow. Bout ready to give it away and go get a cub cadet like my neighbor has.
 
A polar vortex sounds much more frightening than either "climate change", "Covid," or "bird flu". And definitely more frightening than 'winter storm warning', 'winter weather advisory,' or 'snowstorm".

I have to say, the weather adjectives this season have been particularly over the top. In the last go-round of storms a week or two ago, I recall seeing words like "deadly" being used prospectively.
It's all a ruse by the media to create scare tactics. One day we are all going to roast to death because of somebody using hair spray and impacting the ozone and the next day we are all going to freeze to death.

Jan%2010%20Shining.jpg
 
What is supposed to be scaring the public? Naming winter storms? Or are those the scams? Who is profiting from the scams?

I'm not even sure what exactly you're alleging, or who you're accusing of doing it, I'd be curious if you'd flush it out a bit.
Typical political hacks trying to do their thing. “How dare they make a name for this cold blast. They’re trying to scare everyone! Media media media!” These people don’t know shit about the weather, they just spout away then go back to whining about trans people.
 
What is supposed to be scaring the public? Naming winter storms? Or are those the scams? Who is profiting from the scams?

I'm not even sure what exactly you're alleging, or who you're accusing of doing it, I'd be curious if you'd flush it out a bit.

The Weather Channel gets much higher ratings if there's some sort of weather disaster happening, sooooo......
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorneStockton
Just another way to scare the public. "Polar vortex".... Its cold air. We got it in the twin cities every late January - early Feb.
And then naming all the winter storms.... The Weather channel started in 2012. What a scam trying to scare the public.
Best is when they say 105 million people will experience it. Yes, a 1/3 of the nation will feel some cold air. Hopefully the homeless seek shelter/prepare and parents dress their children appropriately.
Wait…I thought we had global warming? 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sullivan
What is supposed to be scaring the public? Naming winter storms? Or are those the scams? Who is profiting from the scams?

I'm not even sure what exactly you're alleging, or who you're accusing of doing it, I'd be curious if you'd flush it out a bit.
Flush it out? LOL Quite the freudian slip.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT