I think it's fairly obvious to everyone (including you, MT, despite your snark) that folks would not be so high on Grothus if we had Logan Stieber in the lineup at 141 with another 4 years of eligibility. We are high on Grothus as a potential alternative to our current starter at 141, who is unlikely to score more than a point at NCAAs. The scope of adoration for Grothus is therefore limited to one specific opportunity in one particular year at one particular weight. The confidence that folks have in Grothus to score 15+ points at NCAAs is far less than they have in Gilman or Clark or Sorensen to do the same at their respective weights. And no one is comparing him to Lincoln Mac or Tom Brands or Barry Davis. The nature of problem solving is to identify the problem, identify the potential available solutions, and draw some conclusions about the subsequent outcomes of each solution. Every time I do the math, Grothus looks like a better alternative than the scenario without him. Period.