ADVERTISEMENT

The Truth’s Bracketology

Sep 8, 2018
7,967
14,190
113


This includes an update through Sunday’s games. There will be wild disagreement with a certain team’s seeding but one bracketologist agrees with me. :D Also, if someone can still put Iowa as an 11 seed then my crazy ass can put them where I did. Let’s thank Penn St for moving up to 75 in the NET rankings, probably temporarily, for another Quadrant 1 win for Iowa.

1 Duke
16 Sam Houston/Prairie View

8 Kansas St
9 Cincinnati

5 LSU
12 Lipscomb

4 Wisconsin
13 Yale

6 Nevada
11 Seton Hall

3 Kentucky
14 Radford

7 Villanova
10 Syracuse

2 Gonzaga
15 UC Irvine

1 Michigan
16 Bucknell

8 NC State
9 Texas

5 Louisville
12 Minnesota/Arizona

4 Marquette
13 Vermont

6 Nebraska
11 San Francisco

3 Houston
14 Texas St

7 Mississippi
10 Ohio St

2 Kansas
15 S Dakota St

1 Virginia
16 Rider

8 Indiana
9 Wofford

5 Virginia Tech
12 VCU

4 Iowa
13 New Mexico St

6 Oklahoma
11 UCF

3 Maryland
14 Loyola Chicago

7 Iowa St
10 St John’s

2 Tennessee
15 N Kentucky

1 Michigan St
16 Norfolk/Robert Morris

8 Florida St
9 TCU

5 Miss St
12 Murray St

4 Buffalo
13 Hofstra

6 Purdue
11 Florida/Butler

3 Texas Tech
14 N Texas

7 Auburn
10 Washington

2 North Carolina
15 Montana
 
Last edited:
Meh.. not that controversial I’ve seen Iowa anywhere from 12-19 on most seed lists.. I do however think there’s a 0% chance Iowa plays Iowa St second round
 
I decided to redo the brackets this week through Sunday’s games based on what is found in the team sheets. I also increased the weighting of the NET rankings.

Quadrant 1 H 1-15 N 1-25 A 1-40
Quadrant 1 H 16-30 N 26-50 A 41-75

Quadrant 2 H 31-55 N 51-75 A 76-100
Quadrant 2 H 56-75 N 76-100 A 101-135
 
Conference breakdown

B1G 10
ACC 8
Big 12 7
SEC 7
Big East 5
AAC 3
PAC 12 2
WCC 2

First 4 out
Alabama
Utah St
Temple
Baylor

Next 4 out
Clemson
Arizona St
Oregon
Fresno St
 
I was going to knock down that 4 seed which seems high at this point, then I see this from the matrix top 10. Nicely done.
http://www.gadepool.com/bracketology.html
https://bracketville.wordpress.com/bracketology/

A couple other top 10’ers, who updated yesterday or today, have them 4 and 5 respectively. This is my first year really taking a stab at it and there’s a balancing act between actual results and those NET rankings. I have the NET rankings as a really big component of what I do because I know how the selection committee works.

Iowa’s NET ranking plus, as of the Jan 20 update, 4 quad 1 and 4 quad 2 wins calculates to a 4 based on my completely made up, and probably wrong, formula. I thought about knocking teams, like Iowa, Virginia Tech, and Nebraska, down a seed if their NCOS was 200+. I left it alone for the time being but I may revisit that idea this week.
 
Out of curiosity, do you mind sharing your formula?

My rough stab took:
Q1 Wins × 4 + Q2 Wins × 2 + Q3 Wins - Q2 Losses - Q3 Losses × 2 - Q4 Losses × 3 + KenPom's Net EM.

I've avoided including NET rankings, since I don't have the actual values, just the ranks.
 
Out of curiosity, do you mind sharing your formula?

My rough stab took:
Q1 Wins × 4 + Q2 Wins × 2 + Q3 Wins - Q2 Losses - Q3 Losses × 2 - Q4 Losses × 3 + KenPom's Net EM.

I've avoided including NET rankings, since I don't have the actual values, just the ranks.

I’m slightly more slanted towards the Q1 wins and less so I’m Q3. Also, I adjusted it to match Q1/Q2 differences on the team sheets.

Q1 x 3.5
Q1 x 3

Q2 x 1.5
Q2 x 1.25

Q3 x .5

Q4 x .1

Losses were trickier to figure out, at least for me. I went with a very simple Loss x -5 using the NET rankings as the value for the loss.

So it’s the quad calculation + NET ranking calculation, really heavily weighted here, + margin of victory calculation + Kenpom efficiency calculation, +SOR calculation - losses.

Honestly, it’s trial by fire. I’ve made several adjustments since I put out my first bracket about a month ago. However, this feels like a finished product now, at least for this season.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT