The WSJ Biden article

[Scruddy]

Biden Derangement Syndrome. Trying to deflect for the disastrous start of Trump part 2.

It hasn't even started yet.. we are on the final month of dementia joe. speaking of deflection..

 

[HawkeyeShawn]

The topic of the thread is to demand answers about Biden's age but ignore Trump's age. Neither should be in office if we're getting serious.

You got the topic of the thread 1/2 right. The thread is to demand answers about Biden’s mental capacity, not necessarily age. Also I don’t believe the OP or WSJ article (paywall) mentions Trumps mental capacity or age for a comparison. IMO those are two different things. I agree, neither should be in office.

In post #4 we get our first response from a Democrat wanting to both sides the issue, completely ignoring the article.

The topic of the thread is about Biden, the WH, his handlers and the media covering up his declining mental capacity over the last 4 years. I’m pretty sure the mental capacity of Trump has been discussed ad nauseam in multiple threads for months/years. It didn’t take long for the rest of your brethren to join in with the same responses.

 

[BioHawk]

Dems have no interest in funding disaster relief?,... good to know.

Again. It is not the Democrats job to do this. Maybe if Republicans would take more accountability for their own inability to do anything then they wouldn't constantly look like complete morons trying to blame Democrats for why they can't do anything. Democrats can get things passed when they have majorities so it isn't impossible. Republicans should be able to do that as well.

 

[Rifler]

Again. It is not the Democrats job to do this. Maybe if Republicans would take more accountability for their own inability to do anything then they wouldn't constantly look like complete morons trying to blame Democrats for why they can't do anything. Democrats can get things passed when they have majorities so it isn't impossible. Republicans should be able to do that as well.

100% of the republican majority would not have been adequate to pass this bill,.. Passage required 2/3 of those voting.

 

[ihhawk]

100% of the republican majority would not have been adequate to pass this bill,.. Passage required 2/3 of those voting.

Don’t rain on his parade with facts

 

[BioHawk]

But we know that spending 1 out of every 4 dollars isn’t enough for the Democrats, they want even more.
Do you think there is a limit? If the federal government spent 1 out of every 3 dollars of wealth Americans created, would it slake their thirst, or would we just hear about new demands?
Why can’t Democrats embrace Clinton era spending levels to restore fiscal sanity? Why did they go off the rails, and how can we get them back?

Tell you what. How about returning to Clinton era taxing levels and then your wish for Clinton era spending levels can be taken more seriously. Of course, to really get into it that means military spending will have to be slashed by about $400-500 billion too. Good luck getting Republicans to agree to that.

 

[BioHawk]

100% of the republican majority would not have been adequate to pass this bill,.. Passage required 2/3 of those voting.

Then I guess they needed a much better bill to get them to vote for it. Republicans are in the driver's seat, it's their job to get the votes.

 

[ihhawk]

The dems all knew

 

[win1forthe]

Biden Derangement Syndrome.

 

[10kHawk]

WSJ is fake news