Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hell No but who knows, this is unprecedented situation on many fronts. Hawley and Cruz if they haven't' resigned need to be Censured and removed.Should anyone under investigation for being involved in the Jan 6 events as a conspirator be allowed to vote in the impeachment process of the person they were allegedly trying to support?
Hell No but who knows, this is unprecedented situation on many fronts. Hawley and Cruz if they haven't' resigned need to be Censured and removed.
Hell No but who knows, this is unprecedented situation on many fronts. Hawley and Cruz if they haven't' resigned need to be Censured and removed.
They are evil and ambitious ****s. They won't so they need to be crippled financially and publically.And I just don't see them resigning. Doesn't strike me thy have that much awareness, esp since they both have ambitions of higher office (no matter how unrealistic).
There is no hurry for a trial now since we are stuck with this ****ing pos no matter what until Jan 20.I mean the Q was a touch rhetorical, however..... should they be allowed to vote is likely a much more serious discussion. Especially considering that their support to Trump on Jan 6 (allegedly) would help keep him in office. But if they ARE allowed to vote, then there are still undermining the rule of law, by preventing him from being removed from office with a NAY vote. So I wonder if the right thing to do IS to actually wait and allow investigations to occur. It's not like it will really matter if he is impeached on Jan 21 vs Feb 3 (or whatever date) in the big picture.
One that's torn out BY the "security officials"I'm no security expert, but what kind of "panic button" can just be "torn out" without any kind of alarm or notification to the security officials?
This where I am at. As said, he ain't going anywhere until Wednesday. Let's go forward with confirmations and legislative agenda, let the facts come out, and try him later. Meanwhile they can build cases against beibert, rayfe, gaytz, et al.I mean the Q was a touch rhetorical, however..... should they be allowed to vote is likely a much more serious discussion. Especially considering that their support to Trump on Jan 6 (allegedly) would help keep him in office. But if they ARE allowed to vote, then there are still undermining the rule of law, by preventing him from being removed from office with a NAY vote. So I wonder if the right thing to do IS to actually wait and allow investigations to occur. It's not like it will really matter if he is impeached on Jan 21 vs Feb 3 (or whatever date) in the big picture.