Doesn't she remind you of Claire Underwood on House of Cards?
Women all look alike to your ilk. I have the same problem with midgets and Labradors.
This graph was used in a congressional hearing today
- Thread starter gusto79
- Start date
Women all look alike to your ilk. I have the same problem with midgets and Labradors.
Your echo chamber rattles around lies and hatred too...hardly the exclusive domain of wingnuts. But...that's different of course.
Just once, have an original thought. Do you work out? Reason I ask is it must be hard work carrying around that rubber stamp reply all day, every day. Having to carry it wherever you go, ready to pull out at a moment's notice. I bet you can curl a ton.
I'm fairly certain if someone here asks if the sky was truly blue, you'd find a Krugman article proclaiming it as such despite the best efforts of the GOP to enact laws to change it to green.
Except PP uses no federal dollars for abortions...
I'm upset at the obvious ploy by the Religious Right and by how many people have fallen for their rhetoric, and subsequently how many women this negatively affects.
When I was 24-25 I dated a college senior. Her religious parents didn't want her to get birth control. So we went to PP. If that option weren't there, the likelihood that we would have had an out of wedlock child would have gone up greatly. And two lives would have been changed forever. PP does good things for this world.
Oh and acting like its a funding issue is such a childish cop out. Your taxes go to much worse things, at much higher levels. It's a religious play to diminish a constitutional right. And when you boil it down to that essence, it's pretty hard to support. Unless you believe we follow Christian law in America, which would make you one of the worst Americans, in my eyes.
Federal funding pays for just about everything that PP does. In doing so, it makes it easier for PP to do abortions and charging as little as possible. It all ends up being the same thing once all the accounting goes through. It pays for he doctors, the staff, the equipment, the buildings, the utilities, etc, etc.
What do you mean they wouldn't let her get birth control, but you went to PP? PP does do some good things here and there, but at the heart of PP is abortion. You're right about taxes by the way, and we can agree on that. I don't believe in christian law, because only thing I enjoy about chrisitians is having unprotected sex with their female members, 18 and up of course. God can suck it for all i care, and so can his naughty little sex partner the devil.
I just don't like abortion being pushed to the side, when in essence that is what people against PP are really talking about.
I'll disagree about the accounting, as a ton of their funding comes from private donations.
And she was on her parent's insurance, so birth control was a no-no, so we went to PP instead.
As for the part I bolded, you're hitting on exactly my argument. This is all a ploy to undercut a constitutionally protected right. It would be like legislation aimed at putting Remington out of business, when there were few, or no other, options available to citizens.
I understand people have a moral objection to abortion, but frankly, their objections don't mean shit. If they want their opinion to be the law of this country, they need to drum up the requisite support to pass a constitutional amendment.
Oh I see, that makes more sense about why y'all went to PP. Not everything needs an amendment to be followed. I've never once said I'd advocate for outlawing abortions or anything that extreme. I'm just not a big fan of them.
I work in Big Data, my job is to make data visual, and itis common to have multiple scales on a graph. Although, the charts above are poorly done.
With differing axis? I don't think that even qualifies as a "chart". It is two "charts" superimposed, therefore confusingly irrelevant.
Hitting on just this last part, I'd be interested in real statistics on people who "care" about the "fetus for profit" issue, and how they correlate to those against abortion.
Nobody on that GOP stage was suddenly against PP because of the videos, the videos are just a tool for them...........I think a failing tool, because it is only emboldening those who were already against PP. It is purely playing to the base.
Similar to Texas outlying these "unsafe" facilities for various "medical" reasons which just, OOPS, so happened to stop abortions throughout a large portion of the state.
Awhat?
I was asking why the question posed was simply about abortion numbers...wasn't this whole thing to be about the fetus-for-profit issue?
