Impossible to imagine all the implications, good and bad. Interesting, though. For starters, it will give a big boost to the move to automate fast-food outlets, replacing people with machines -- again, good and bad.
why? they are a socialist worker party joint, especially kagan, her grandpa was a card carrying worker party commie.
Because it's a union/worker-friendly decision and this is a business-friendly court.
business friendly court unless your business is a wedding chapel for traditional marriages, or a business which makes non-gay cakes, or if you are an insurance company for health insurance prior to Obama care, or a family doctor who does not want to buy into the networks of obamacare, or tea party affiliated in any way.
Has the court ruled against any wedding chapels?
Why in a franchise operation would that be true? They mostly work for small, independently owned companies. It was purely a political decision made to reward unions, a big Democratic backer. Like the rising minimum wage, this will bring on automation quicker and destroy jobs
well, the local or circuit courts have ruled and people are taking it to the supremes, supposedly , on the chapel and cake issue.... and yes, the court has ruled against individual free market health insurance companies when they said the subsidies were a tax and the feds and Obama were totalitarians and a tyranny and they are able to tax and subsidy the insurance companies and doctors out of existence. And, I have no idea what makes a cake gay but I gotta assume it has to do with the topper on top, or bottom, hee hee , and the writing, which would be a first amendment issue of course.
they have the power to kill babies and to go against god on the holy matrimony of one man and one woman. well, they really do not have that power but they think they do, and liberals think they do
out of all the weird crap I've written and you happen to pick the most traditional and populist conservative view to call weird
Automation is coming either way, why do you care if it is expedited? You don't care about labor anyway.
As much as I hate government overreach this was a decision they can make. And like I said to satisfy their union overlords they made it
This is a valid argument, but it's a bit of a sticky wicket. Denver, for instance, is on the verge of banning Chick-Fil-A from DIA because of what the CEO said several years ago about gay marriage. The opponents are saying that regardless of what the local franchisee does or says, the comments of the CEO override other issues.
