ADVERTISEMENT

This statement on how Pope Francis' worldview lines up.....

I'm not in disagreement over the benefits of this setup. I'm questioning that the Pope is expressing an openness to anything outside of the traditional definition.

Gotcha.

The church does view sex a method for procreation.

I'm sure you and your Bo's can rattle the rafters, but neither of you are at risk of becoming even half pregnant.
 
Gotcha.

The church does view sex a method for procreation.

I'm sure you and your Bo's can rattle the rafters, but neither of you are at risk of becoming even half pregnant.
A fact I thank God for every day. But Catholics aren't as puritanical as they sometimes get labeled. Catholics recognize the benefits fun sex has for relationship building. I went to Catholic School, they taught us what a blow job was in the 4th grade. Sure they want the relationship of their liking to take place first and want the sex open to receiving the spiritual gifts, but they know its supposed to be fun and embrace that part too.
 
Have to love our country. We can take anything and try to make it a "win" for our side.

Pope Francis comes in with a message of service and hope and we make it about which of our two political parties he is more in line with.
Think about it this way....

Did you like some of the things Pope Frank said?

Would you like it if Congress acted on any of those things?

If the answer to those questions is "yes." which party would be introducing which legislative elements?

GOP: ban abortion.

Dems: most of the rest.

Speaking for myself, as a lefty atheist, I would like to see Pope Frank's recommendations introduced. Sure, the devil could be in the details, but I would support most of what I heard or what his words implied in policy terms.
 
Think about it this way....

Did you like some of the things Pope Frank said?

Would you like it if Congress acted on any of those things?

If the answer to those questions is "yes." which party would be introducing which legislative elements?

GOP: ban abortion.

Dems: most of the rest.

Speaking for myself, as a lefty atheist, I would like to see Pope Frank's recommendations introduced. Sure, the devil could be in the details, but I would support most of what I heard or what his words implied in policy terms.
Yep, looks like your side is the winner. Congrats!
 
Thursdays With Torbee.....Pope Francis is an activist who
would feel comfortable in the Democratic Party as he pushes
the Climate Change agenda and normalized relations with Cuba.
The Pope has also denounced the income gap between the
rich and the poor as he favors the redistribution of wealth and
elimination of capitalism.
What's your point?
 
Yep, looks like your side is the winner. Congrats!
Needless to say I don't require an outside authority to ratify what my reason tells me is good.

But, sure, It's nice to finally have a prominent religious figure who seems to get it.

Keep pushing the winner-loser meme if you want to. It's as good a way as any to deflect. The question I wonder is why you want to deflect.
 
Needless to say I don't require an outside authority to ratify what my reason tells me is good.

But, sure, It's nice to finally have a prominent religious figure who seems to get it.

Keep pushing the winner-loser meme if you want to. It's as good a way as any to deflect. The question I wonder is why you want to deflect.
I am sure someone as smart as you are already knows why I am trying to deflect.

My side is on the losing side of the prominent religious figure. We are evil and want people to suffer.
 
Obama and the dems hate religion until it can help them or until a Jesuit commie comes along and acts all liberal. just like they hate bush killing muslims until they can fake like Obama killed obl to shut trump up, and the Hawaii folks, about the birth certificate
 
I am sure someone as smart as you are already knows why I am trying to deflect.

My side is on the losing side of the prominent religious figure. We are evil and want people to suffer.
You can join my team. I'll help get you through the initiation. I know all the codes.
 
Needless to say I don't require an outside authority to ratify what my reason tells me is good.

But, sure, It's nice to finally have a prominent religious figure who seems to get it.

Keep pushing the winner-loser meme if you want to. It's as good a way as any to deflect. The question I wonder is why you want to deflect.

You cherry-pick your points as usual.

You minimize the mass of the Pope's disapproval of abortion.

You will wind up on the wrong side of the Pope and Science eventually.
 
Other than abortion and gay marriage, what social issues do he and the GOP agree on?

Similarly, while I agree that he seems more dovish than either party, he's to the LEFT of both parties on peace, helping refugees, helping the poor around the world, and pretty much every other foreign policy issue I can think of.

Not trying to be snarky here, but I don't think he's really very much in line with the right beyond abortion and gays, but maybe I'm forgetting things. And even on those, he seems much more accepting than your average American evangelist.

If I'm right, it isn't a half-and-half thing like some seem to be suggesting.

He's to the right of either party on divorce. If I had to guess if he was in charge he would end no fault divorce. Also probably to the right on contraception. I don't think the popes believe in making it illegal but they certainly wouldn't be providing it for free as part of a standard insurance plan.

This is honestly why on a 2 axis political test I incorrectly end up more towards the liberal end then the communitarian end. Because as it's not a typical part of our current political dialog there are no questions about divorce. And I know I'm in a tiny minority here but I support a complete end to no fault divorce.

Also religious freedom, I guess this sort of goes with Gay Marriage but they would likely support strong religious freedom protections. Only the popes oddly enough have been more fair with religious freedom then many Republicans. They realize that religious freedom applies to Muslims too.
 
Last edited:
Other than abortion and gay marriage, what social issues do he and the GOP agree on?

Similarly, while I agree that he seems more dovish than either party, he's to the LEFT of both parties on peace, helping refugees, helping the poor around the world, and pretty much every other foreign policy issue I can think of.

Not trying to be snarky here, but I don't think he's really very much in line with the right beyond abortion and gays, but maybe I'm forgetting things. And even on those, he seems much more accepting than your average American evangelist.

If I'm right, it isn't a half-and-half thing like some seem to be suggesting.


My question is, if you (not you specifically) jump up and down touting he said something the left agrees with, then he says abortion and gay marriage is bad, do you just dismiss it as hogwash?
 
Think about it this way....

Did you like some of the things Pope Frank said?

Would you like it if Congress acted on any of those things?

If the answer to those questions is "yes." which party would be introducing which legislative elements?

GOP: ban abortion.

Dems: most of the rest.

I would like to see Pope Frank's recommendations introduced. .

Ban abortion and gay marriage along with the rest of his recommendations??
 
Obama and the dems hate religion until it can help them or until a Jesuit commie comes along and acts all liberal. just like they hate bush killing muslims until they can fake like Obama killed obl to shut trump up, and the Hawaii folks, about the birth certificate

Generalities aside, people don't hate religion. What I like is when actions and moral principles align and dislike people who present themselves as one thing and act in another manner.

If the Pope is a commie Jesuit than count me on the side that respects the ideals of a commie Jesuit.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT