Yeah, if it doesn't have any impact on your life you don't give a shit. Time to step down from your soap box.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, if it doesn't have any impact on your life you don't give a shit. Time to step down from your soap box.
Well "she's" a guy soooooooooGood for her. Sounds like she worked hard and accomplished a goal.
It's bigotry to pretend that this is anything more than a local issue that the governing athletic association should handle.
Now if you agree that this is an overblown issue and that the governing association should set the rules, ban or no ban, then fair enough.
But if someone thinks that this is a national crisis requiring government action, then you're a bigot.
As far as transitioning goes, that's up to the person and their doctor. You should have no say in it.
Let the leagues handle it. This is their business. We’ve been here before with unfair advantages. Astros, Patriots, PED Users, Lance Armstrong, Sosa, Clemens, etc etc.Tell that to then girls that used to be guys, they were the ones who chose to transition. Fvck you with that bullshit
I can only speak for me.Interestingly, I would say there is a flavor of conservativism in the view. Sex is a biological term not subject to feelings and opinions. Your sex is determined your reproductive organs, so this competitor is objectively male. Gender, on the other hand, is a social construct that is based on traditional roles of men versus women. Conservatives are usually the ones who support the legitimacy of gender and gender roles. But the entire concept that some people are “women in a man’s body” (or vice versa) is meaningless unless you first consider traditional gender roles as predominant. Traditional liberals deny the legitimacy of traditional gender roles. So this subject has really turned this topsy turvy.
I think conservatives has a knee jerk reaction to be opposed (and even disgusted) by people are sexually “different” and thus oppose transgenders. Liberals view most trans folks as underdogs, and the victim of bigotry, and so they support them even to the extent it opposes their usual principles.
So it seems emotion is driving the conversation rather than normal political principles.
What a stupid post for a made up issue.Assuming you are a male, or were at least born a male, I bet your mom and sister (if you have any) and female friends (if you have any) sure are proud that you don’t care that their gender doesn’t matter and is slowly being erased. But you do support the party that can’t define what a woman is, so as you say this isn’t an issue…nothing to see here.
In other words, it has nothing to do with Trump, so no reason for you to rant and rave and drop a Chis bomb.
Your lack of empathy for women is head scratching.for a made up issue.
You can count the number of high end trans athletes on one hand. To buy into this political Boogeyman is absurdly dumb. Be smarter.Your lack of empathy for women is head scratching.
I thought liberals were better.
This is not political for me. I shouldn’t have to keep telling you that.You can count the number of high end trans athletes on one hand. To buy into this political Boogeyman is absurdly dumb. Be smarter.
You make several good points about the larger points of discussion.Interestingly, I would say there is a flavor of conservativism in the view. Sex is a biological term not subject to feelings and opinions. Your sex is determined your reproductive organs, so this competitor is objectively male. Gender, on the other hand, is a social construct that is based on traditional roles of men versus women. Conservatives are usually the ones who support the legitimacy of gender and gender roles. But the entire concept that some people are “women in a man’s body” (or vice versa) is meaningless unless you first consider traditional gender roles as predominant. Traditional liberals deny the legitimacy of traditional gender roles. So this subject has really turned this topsy turvy.
I think conservatives has a knee jerk reaction to be opposed (and even disgusted) by people are sexually “different” and thus oppose transgenders. Liberals view most trans folks as underdogs, and the victim of bigotry, and so they support them even to the extent it opposes their usual principles.
So it seems emotion is driving the conversation rather than normal political principles.
It’s a man you dolt.So not actually a man?
Quite the lazy defense of your position. Even one injustice should be enough for change. It seems every other week there's a new story about this shit.You can count the number of high end trans athletes on one hand. To buy into this political Boogeyman is absurdly dumb. Be smarter.
👍👍👍👍👍I can only speak for me.
It’s about fidelity to women’s sports and nothing more.
How people identify as male or female is no more my concern than what a woman chooses to do with her reproductive healthcare.
Then why do you keep trying to make if a left leaning issue?This is not political for me. I shouldn’t have to keep telling you that.
As I said, even 1 female athlete that is disenfranchised is too many. Especially if it is a female that wanted to compete in an event but didn't due to a male to trans-female competing.You can count the number of high end trans athletes on one hand. To buy into this political Boogeyman is absurdly dumb. Be smarter.
Trans athletes are already banned in Iowa. Yet here we are. People like you still demand more. This is a Boogeyman to distract from the fact that Rs can't handle real problems like poor schools, crappy water, healthcare, infrastructure, and basically everything else. Open you eyes. You're being duped.Quite the lazy defense of your position. Even one injustice should be enough for change. It seems every other week there's a new story about this shit.
No problem can be reduced to zero occurrences. You're being completely unreasonable in pretending otherwise. And no, this isn't a national level problem. You claiming it is is ridiculous.As I said, even 1 female athlete that is disenfranchised is too many. Especially if it is a female that wanted to compete in an event but didn't due to a male to trans-female competing.
You're on the wrong side of this.
Defend it from the position you took above. You disagree with the enforcement/remedy but agree with the premise that trans-women shouldnt compete against biological women.
You cant disagree with the opponents remedy if you cant even agree there is a problem.
If you can step back and look at the issue critically, this is not political. People like you who are hyper focused on politics may think it is, but it's really not. It's about right and wrong. It's wrong to let males compete against women in competitive sports. If you can't grasp that logic, then you are either mentally deficient or just an obtuse asshole.Trans athletes are already banned in Iowa. Yet here we are. People like you still demand more. This is a Boogeyman to distract from the fact that Rs can't handle real problems like poor schools, crappy water, healthcare, infrastructure, and basically everything else. Open you eyes. You're being duped.
Keep beating that drum boy. It’s a winnerDon't marginalize the marginalization.
What do you mean?Then why do you keep trying to make if a left leaning issue?
Bingo so much stupid in this thread.You can count the number of high end trans athletes on one hand. To buy into this political Boogeyman is absurdly dumb. Be smarter.
Wrong again, common occurrence.Yeah, if it doesn't have any impact on your life you don't give a shit. Time to step down from your soap box.
Bingo so much stupid in this thread.
If you can step back and look at the issue critically, this is not political. People like you who are hyper focused on politics may think it is, but it's really not. It's about right and wrong. It's wrong to let males compete against women in competitive sports. If you can't grasp that logic, then you are either mentally deficient or just an obtuse asshole.
How often does that happen? Stats?Kinda like black people getting shot by police without justification
Outside of the contributions you and Huey have made, I am not seeing much stupid.Bingo so much stupid in this thread.
I’d be willing to wager in the last five years there have been more high school and college males competing in women’s sports than anyone, regardless of race, who has been unjustifiably shot by the police.How often does that happen? Stats?
Get over yourself. This entire thread has been politicizing it and blaming the left. Your dishonesty here is staggering.If you can step back and look at the issue critically, this is not political. People like you who are hyper focused on politics may think it is, but it's really not. It's about right and wrong. It's wrong to let males compete against women in competitive sports. If you can't grasp that logic, then you are either mentally deficient or just an obtuse asshole.
Another bald faced lie. We have the two Connecticut runners, who no longer compete, Lia Thomas, who no longer competes, and now this trackster. And that is in the last several years. Four athletes in nearly a decade. You're embarrassing yourself here.I’d be willing to wager in the last five years there have been more high school and college males competing in women’s sports than anyone, regardless of race, who has been unjustifiably shot by the police.
Common sense not at all supported by reality is not common sense.Outside of the contributions you and Huey have made, I am not seeing much stupid.
This is common sense, Chishawk. No one who isn’t already voting for Trump is changing their vote because of this, so relax.
What a waste of time. That's the point of these non issues RW trash spews to mask their Fascist, terrorist ways.Common sense not at all supported by reality is not common sense.
You mouthed off about liberals. If you can't stand by your words, don't use them.What do you mean?
Other than the fact almost no one on the right would agree with your point of view.
Another bald faced lie. We have the two Connecticut runners, who no longer compete, Lia Thomas, who no longer competes, and now this trackster. And that is in the last several years. Four athletes in nearly a decade. You're embarrassing yourself here.
Rs can't govern so they invent wedge issues like this and pea brains like Ragno eats the wedges up. Four gd trans athletes nationwide since at least 2017 yet we're all supposed to be freaking out. It's embarrassing how easily some posters in here allow themselves to be duped.What a waste of time. That's the point of these non issues RW trash spews to mask their Fascist, terrorist ways.
Name them. Should be easy to compile a list thousands long.You can’t honestly be dumb enough to believe that there has only been 4 instances of this happening in College and High School.
So now they're throwing their penises around on the taxpayer dime? You dupes have jumped the shark.Take your penis and throw it out the window. Biological sex doesn't matter anymore. Unless you catch the penis, then you're a trans and get run in track meets... on the tax payers dime.