ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Cancels Construction of One of America's Largest Wind Farms

Sullivan

HB Heisman
Nov 24, 2001
6,973
1,597
113

Trump Cancels Construction of One of America's Largest Wind Farms​


Donald Trump halted construction on what was set to be the largest wind farm in the U.S. on his first day in office.

The president stopped building work on over 100,000 acres of clean energy infrastructure at the Lava Ridge Wind Project in Idaho via an executive order on Tuesday.

Newsweek contacted the White House and developers Magic Valley Energy for more information on the order, the decision and the implications for those involved in the project via email. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) declined to comment when approached by Newsweek.
The move is part of a series of day-one promises that Trump pledged to fulfill once he was sworn in.

In his inauguration speech, Trump said that the U.S. would "drill, baby, drill," and expand oil and gas initiatives at the expense of renewable energy projects. This order, along with his removal of the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement, symbolizes Trump's move towards traditional fuel sources.

The Lava Ridge Wind Project would have been a 104,000-acre wind farm in Lava Ridge, Idaho, with over 271 turbines planned by developers Magic Valley Energy.

This would have made Lava Ridge the largest wind farm in the U.S. by area, beating out the 100,000-acre titleholder in Roscoe, Texas.

However, because of the project's scale, it was met with skepticism by local campaigners, including Republican Idaho Senator Jim Risch. In 2023, Idaho lawmakers issued a statement with concerns over how the project was being managed by the BLM.

Local campaign groups, such as the Friends of Minidoka, were concerned that the construction would impact the Minidoka National Historic Site, which was the location of an internment camp for Japanese Americans during World War II.

Trump signed the executive order, which was co-written by Risch, on Monday, with Risch saying: "By prioritizing this executive action on his first day in office, President Trump further cements his legacy as a leader in the revolution commonsense that governs by the people and for the people."

Risch said in a statement on the order: "I made a promise to Idahoans that I would not rest until the Lava Ridge Wind Project was terminated. On day one, President Donald Trump took action to keep that promise.

"Lava Ridge has been the embodiment of liberals' disregard for the voices of Idahoans and rural America. Despite intense and widespread opposition from Idaho and the Japanese American community, the previous administration remained dead set on pushing this unwanted project across the finish line."

Trump is very busy in his first week back in the Oval Office, issuing executive orders on a wide range of issues.

It isn't yet clear whether the project has been canceled altogether and whether there will be any challenges to the decision

 
TL;DR Summary:

Trump kills over 2000 US jobs in first day.

Analysis:
The cancellation of the Lava Ridge Wind Project by President Trump likely resulted in the loss of numerous jobs tied to the project. This includes both direct construction jobs (such as those involved in building the wind turbines and infrastructure) and indirect jobs in related industries (e.g., manufacturing of turbines, transportation, and maintenance). The project, intended to span 104,000 acres and consist of 271 turbines, would have created significant employment opportunities (not to mention clean energy).
 
Simon Cowell Wow GIF by America's Got Talent
 
Could you articulate why you support this? When it comes to energy, this really shouldn't be political and every damn means to generate it should be used--natural gas, oil, wind, nuclear, solar, coal, hydroelectric, geothermal, hydrogen, et al!
I agree. I'm a huge fan of hybrid technology. I've said before I would love a hybrid SUV that I could shoot around town in on battery then switch to ICE for road trips. That would be fantastic, but they seem to be fewer available. People act like oil is a limitless resource.
 
Could you articulate why you support this? When it comes to energy, this really shouldn't be political and every damn means to generate it should be used--natural gas, oil, wind, nuclear, solar, coal, hydroelectric, geothermal, hydrogen, et al!
It doesn't pay for itself. We've thrown trillions at it and only get a very small percent of energy from it.
 
Could you articulate why you support this? When it comes to energy, this really shouldn't be political and every damn means to generate it should be used--natural gas, oil, wind, nuclear, solar, coal, hydroelectric, geothermal, hydrogen, et al!
The only thing I can think of is it reduces demand on fossil fuel energy so not only does it help lower carbon emissions, it lowers the price of gas. He just doesn't feel important unless 20% of the annual budget goes to fossil fuel costs. Or something like that.
 
It doesn't pay for itself. We've thrown trillions at it and only get a very small percent of energy from it.
Trillions!? WTF! Sure, initial investments can be pricey for wind turbines, but over time they pay off with lower operating costs compared to fossil fuels. As for energy contribution, while wind still makes up a smaller share globally [that's world-wide, not us cities in case H4aD gets confused again], it’s growing fast and already provides a substantial percentage of power in other countries.
 
Trillions!? WTF! Sure, initial investments can be pricey for wind turbines, but over time they pay off with lower operating costs compared to fossil fuels. As for energy contribution, while wind still makes up a smaller share globally [that's world-wide, not us cities in case H4aD gets confused again], it’s growing fast and already provides a substantial percentage of power in other countries.
The windmills are only good for 20 years, then need repaired, which is almost the cost of the windmill itself. They pay for the land they are on, which isn't cheap either.
 
The windmills are only good for 20 years, then need repaired, which is almost the cost of the windmill itself. They pay for the land they are on, which isn't cheap either.
You know, the wind turbines they are building now are significantly more efficient than the ones they were building even 10 years ago. It is worth their time to replace them after 20 years as better technology can be installed. Also, you make it sound like no one is making money on these things. If that were the case then they wouldn't be built.
 
We have not "thrown trillions" at it. The number I found was not quite $17 billion since 2016. And it accounts for about 10% of our energy production. That's not nothing.
They started in 2009. Add in the cost to lease the land, repairs, maintenance. If they were doing their job, our light bills would be going down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
We should probably bring some manufacturing back here before it's too late.
Why? Seems many on here think getting shit from other countries is a great thing. F*** it, let them bring it in with little to no tariffs.

The Dems of the 70-80's would lose their shit over this. I remember bumper stickers everywhere about buy American, support the USA.

JFC, the Democrat party has completely fallen off a woke cliff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: libbity bibbity
Why? Seems many on here think getting shit from other countries is a great thing. F*** it, let them bring it in with little to no tariffs.

The Dems of the 70-80's would lose their shit over this. I remember bumper stickers everywhere about buy American, support the USA.

JFC, the Democrat party has completely fallen off a woke cliff.
if embracing global free trade is "woke"

ronald reagan was the wokest president we ever had
 
Why? Seems many on here think getting shit from other countries is a great thing. F*** it, let them bring it in with little to no tariffs.

The Dems of the 70-80's would lose their shit over this. I remember bumper stickers everywhere about buy American, support the USA.

JFC, the Democrat party has completely fallen off a woke cliff.

Tariffs will be a world of hurt to normal people especially with manufacturing not doing great in the US. I would say make incentive to return manufacturing and then tariffs on industries that need protecting.
 
Good. Why send federal money to a project where the locals don’t want it?

Idaho doesn’t want good jobs. Why force it on them?

They voted for trump so I'm sure they're fine with it.

Are there any good federal entitlement programs, asking for an Idahoan?
 
Super Troopers Yes GIF by Searchlight Pictures

and I'll add, solar and windmills on the doubling down.
plus many of the windmill parts come from China. :rolleyes:
I want nuclear, but wind and solar are also important. I don't mind drilling, but HATE the idea of opening up more protected lands. Would rather pay a bit more for gas and energy and continue with progress towards sustainable sources. Drill baby drill ain't the panacea that is being sold.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT