Not sure about hundreds of thousands, but I was referring to the Taliban not just letting them go.
Trump screwed over military, children, and those
- Thread starter St. Louis Hawk
- Start date
LOL...a national conversation about what, exactly? Immigration? Like that isn't front and center already. Amending the Constitution to revoke birth-right citizenship? Draft it. Put it out there. Don't pretend you have the power to directly overrule the Constitution by EO.
FTR, I wouldn't put money on this SCOTUS striking down anything he does.
I had no problem with it since it's an idiot's fairy tale. Out of curiosity, what was your previous incarnation here?
Doesn't matter, this is what the Ignore feature is made for.
Russians used to be everywhere, now it’s the Nazis.
Please, please continue to bravely post on here stealing your employer’s time to keep me safe from Russians and Nazis!
Please, please continue to bravely post on here stealing your employer’s time to keep me safe from Russians and Nazis!
Trump’s executive order claims the 14th Amendment has “never been interpreted” to give universal citizenship to everyone born in the U.S.—adopting a theory that’s been pushed by a minority of legal experts, which claims the 14th Amendment granting birthright citizenship to people who are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. means the amendment doesn’t apply to children of undocumented immigrants who are residing in the U.S. unlawfully or people who aren’t permanent residents.
Can Trump End Birthright Citizenship? Executive Order Already Faces Legal Challenges—Here’s Why
Trump's executive order interprets the law in his favor, but with lawsuits already pending, legal experts have been skeptical he'll succeed.
www.forbes.com
Yes, birth-right citizenship,... and you start the process by confirming our current interpretation of the 14th amendment,.. This E.O. is how you begin to test the water...
All persons born...in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
There's no "interpretation" of that which can change what it clearly and unambiguously says. Are they "persons"? Were they "born in the United States"? Are they "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"? Yes. Yes. Yes. Citizens of the United States. Period. Gonna have to amend the Constitution to change it.
Would these be the same legal experts who believe in the independent state legislature theory?Trump’s executive order claims the 14th Amendment has “never been interpreted” to give universal citizenship to everyone born in the U.S.—adopting a theory that’s been pushed by a minority of legal experts, which claims the 14th Amendment granting birthright citizenship to people who are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. means the amendment doesn’t apply to children of undocumented immigrants who are residing in the U.S. unlawfully or people who aren’t permanent residents.
Can Trump End Birthright Citizenship? Executive Order Already Faces Legal Challenges—Here’s Why
Trump's executive order interprets the law in his favor, but with lawsuits already pending, legal experts have been skeptical he'll succeed.
Just so you know, exercising personal “choices” in the United States military is frowned on.
Since Covid, somehow the idea has gotten out there that personal freedom trumps everything else.
I’m curious as to why it can’t be discussed right now? What might be the purpose of the useless dog and pony show?
We need a current SCOTUS interpretation on the 14th amendment first,.. If pursued at all this would become a multi-year long process.
Because it was proven to mitigate the length and severity of one’s exposure to the virus. That’s the facts, Jack.
Not logic. Like most right wing talking points it's an oversimplification of a complex issue. It's the way of the right since they can't see the bigger picture.
Why? The language is crystal clear. Just put together an amendment to the Constitution rather than wait years for SCOTUS to rule on a clearly unconstitutional EA?
Bingo. I’m gonna bet any amount you like that this is the whole point. Just another fvcking issue for them to run on with no desire to do anything about it.
Proven? Not hardly. Not one shred of clinical evidence - only statistics. Heck, the clinical trials on infection proved to be completely wrong, and we found out a year later there weren't any clinical trials on transmission.
Uhhhh…statistics ARE clinical evidence. What the hell do you think you get from clinical trials? Stick to whatever it is that you do best.
LOL...then you should definitely talk to them and ask them if they can refuse a direct, legal order. The answer is, of course they can. And then they'll be court-martialed. Read up on Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Why? Why do we NEED it? Because racists want to kick brown Americans out of here? Never mind answering, because THAT’S the reason.
You don't get it. Go ahead and poison soldiers and yourself. Many good soldiers left due to it. 70 percent received a general discharge. The 97 vax rate is I am sure bogus. What is it with some of you idiots that want to poison others?
Poison?!?!!?!!? hahahahahaha you're being more dramatic than a teenage girl.
No offense
How dare you challenge @Finance85, he knows everything. Just ask him.
Statistics come from clinical trials and statistics come from observations where there were no clinical trials. There's a difference. Clinical trials have controls. Perhaps you should whatever it is you know best, or even at all.
You mean like posting in English? I can do that. And I'll point out that the information from observational studies is also statistical and has a long and respected history in the scientific field. Observational studies, for example, demonstrated the link between smoking and lung cancer. And there are ABSOLUTELY controls in an observational study. To think otherwise demonstrates your total ignorance on the subject. My degree is in biology and I've worked in a lab studying environmental methymercury. You?
Educate yourself. Or not.
Are all the other vaccines that military members are required to take stop all infections and transmissions? Start with cholera.
So you think it’s totally fine to jam some vaccine into someone that doesn’t do anything and didn’t have shit for testing before it was forced into bodies.
Hasn't that always been the way with the military. Covid wasn't the first time it happened. I am pretty sure you know this.
Ok times have changed. Some people fighting for your freedom didn’t want to inject a new untested drug into themselves but you’re saying tough shit, they did it in the past. Boy just think if we kept that mentality
