ADVERTISEMENT

Trump the law giver

this-is-fine-fine.gif
 
It’s weird to me that people claimed Biden did stuff like this and complained about it like crazy.

Trump is actually doing it and none of those people care.
Yeah, but he's just using supreme power to keep bathrooms safe, and to stop all the DEI that is ruining America. He'll never use it against me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mthawkeyes
How should the Executive branch handle inappropriate overreach by the Judicial branch?
Well, you seem to support getting rid of judicial review, which is what this announcement is by them. That only they get to decide what is and isn’t legal.

You’d have to really hate the constitution and our form of government to agree with this dumb shit.
 
How should the Executive branch handle inappropriate overreach by the Judicial branch?

Impeach a judge
Lobby Congress to cut judicial funding
Appeal to higher courts

But cool you want to get rid of hundreds of years of judicial review all to further empower a convicted felon.

Feels a little too on the nose, even for you.
 
Congress needs to put a stop to Judicial overreach? How quickly can they do it as to not interfere with the Executive’s legal authority and prerogative?
Yes. The Executives legal authory and prerogative is always under the review of Congress and the Judiciary. Are you suggesting the President gets to do what they want in the name of speed?

How quickly can a rouge President become a dictator if the other two branches don't intervene?

You're a rube among rubes.
 
“The President and the Attorney General’s opinions on questions of law are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties,” the order states.

With respect to the Executive branch.

Why does this even need to be stated?

And why do Federal Judges think they can just contradict lawful acts of the Executive branch if they don’t like what is being done?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
With respect to the Executive branch.

Why does this even need to be stated?

And why do Federal Judges think they can just contradict lawful acts of the Executive branch if they don’t like what is being done?
Because they are not lawful acts. And the Judicial branch determines what is lawful.

You're terrible at this.
 
With respect to the Executive branch.

Why does this even need to be stated?

And why do Federal Judges think they can just contradict lawful acts of the Executive branch if they don’t like what is being done?

You could at least try to understand the problem and the issue before you dismiss it.

Courts say what the law is. Work your way through it. If Trump says the law requires this and a Court says it does not, I hope you can grasp the problem that creates for every federal employee and American.

Or you can read this:

 
And why do Federal Judges think they can just contradict lawful acts of the Executive branch if they don’t like what is being done?
That's the entire point of judicial review genius. if POTUS or Congress could unilaterally decide what's legal and what's not, you've just decided the Judicial branch of the government has no power.
 
It's a long standing norm. Nothing to see here.

"I can do anything I want. And if it's illegal I can just say no it's not, just ask me"
Based on that short statement it didn't have anything to do with what the president could do, it had to do with the president and AG being the only ones who could serve as spokespeople for what the law is.

It seems like a stupid executive order. Anyone can state an opinion of what they think the law is, and the court decides whether they're right or not.

Of course that was just a sound byte, we don't know what that EO actually is...

I'm sure it's sinister though right?
 
And why do Federal Judges think they can just contradict lawful acts of the Executive branch if they don’t like what is being done?
Holy shit. WTF do you think Trump has been doing?

He pardons Adams. Adams then gets more slam dunk charges pressed against him by Trump appointed prosecutors. Trump then tells the prosecutors to not do their jobs they took an oath to do. Then you pretend you don’t like people in power contradicting lawful acts because they don’t like what’s being done.
 
You could at least try to understand the problem and the issue before you dismiss it.

Courts say what the law is. Work your way through it. If Trump says the law requires this and a Court says it does not, I hope you can grasp the problem that creates for every federal employee and American.

Or you can read this:



He is waiting for a tweet from DOGE with uninformed snark before he is able to celebrate the EO.
 
Congress needs to put a stop to Judicial overreach? How quickly can they do it as to not interfere with the Executive’s legal authority and prerogative?

Trump could get anything he wants passed very quickly, he controls both houses.

The fact he is completely ignoring congress is a bug and not a feature.
 
Trump could get anything he wants passed very quickly, he controls both houses.

The fact he is completely ignoring congress is a bug and not a feature.
He’s doubling down on what he failed to learn last time…being POTUS is not close to the same thing as being CEO of a company.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT