ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Rep. Steve King claims, on Twitter, that he knows the whistleblower's identity

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,922
59,561
113
Deplorable:

U.S. Rep. Steve King tweeted out photos of a person he believes could be the whistleblower behind the recent impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukraine.

The Iowa Republican posted photos to Twitter of a man standing with various Democratic politicians, including Hillary Clinton, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren. King wrote the photos "are four strong clues" about the whistleblower's identity.

That tweet was later deleted and replaced with another post that included three photos of a man's face. Along with the photos, King tweeted that he does not know the whistleblower's identity, but the photos are "a better clue."

"Adam Schiff said, 'I do not know the identity of the whistleblower.' Me either, but @RepAdamSchiff here’s a better clue."

Some Republicans have suggested that Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has met personally with the whistleblower. On Wednesday, Schiff denied knowing the identity of the person who made the report.

Conservatives' push to reveal the whistleblower's identity comes as the U.S. House of Representatives launched its first week of public hearings in the impeachment inquiry. Renewed talks of impeachment started after an anonymous report was filed alleging Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son.

The whistleblower's identity has not been officially revealed or verified, despite calls from the president and conservative allies to make it public. Numerous conservative websites and social media accounts claim to know the identity of the whistleblower.

King's office did not respond to requests for comment about his Twitter posts or the relationship between the man in the photographs and the whistleblower case.

Federal laws provide protections to whistleblowers. It's unclear what consequences King could face if his tweets have revealed the person who made the report.

King is not the only Republican in Congress who has made allegations about the identity of the whistleblower. U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Arizona, retweeted King's original tweet showing four photos of the alleged whistleblower.

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul shared the name of a person he believes could be the whistleblower on a conservative talk radio show Wednesday. The person "needs to be pulled in for testimony" to clarify whether they are indeed the whistleblower, Paul said.

The organization employing the person pictured on King's social media also released a statement that King was circulating false information.

This isn't King's first time weighing in on the impeachment process. Last month, he joined other Republican House members in a protest over the secrecy of impeachment inquiry testimony by the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Reform committees.

King does not sit on any House committees. He was removed from his assignments by House Republicans after comments he made to the New York Times about white nationalism and white supremacy.

Iowa's Republican U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst have said politicians should not try to reveal the identity of the whistleblower, in accordance with federal law. In a call with reporters in November, Grassley argued that the whistleblower's identity does not matter as impeachment hearings proceed.

"I don’t know whether the whistleblower’s very darn important when what the president has done in two instances: one, released the whistleblowers’ comments and, secondly, released the transcript of the telephone call with the president of Ukraine," Grassley said.

https://www.press-citizen.com/story...esident-donald-trump-ukraine-iowa/4195065002/
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Deplorable:

U.S. Rep. Steve King tweeted out photos of a person he believes could be the whistleblower behind the recent impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukraine.

The Iowa Republican posted photos to Twitter of a man standing with various Democratic politicians, including Hillary Clinton, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren. King wrote the photos "are four strong clues" about the whistleblower's identity.

That tweet was later deleted and replaced with another post that included three photos of a man's face. Along with the photos, King tweeted that he does not know the whistleblower's identity, but the photos are "a better clue."

"Adam Schiff said, 'I do not know the identity of the whistleblower.' Me either, but @RepAdamSchiff here’s a better clue."

Some Republicans have suggested that Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has met personally with the whistleblower. On Wednesday, Schiff denied knowing the identity of the person who made the report.

Conservatives' push to reveal the whistleblower's identity comes as the U.S. House of Representatives launched its first week of public hearings in the impeachment inquiry. Renewed talks of impeachment started after an anonymous report was filed alleging Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son.

The whistleblower's identity has not been officially revealed or verified, despite calls from the president and conservative allies to make it public. Numerous conservative websites and social media accounts claim to know the identity of the whistleblower.

King's office did not respond to requests for comment about his Twitter posts or the relationship between the man in the photographs and the whistleblower case.

Federal laws provide protections to whistleblowers. It's unclear what consequences King could face if his tweets have revealed the person who made the report.

King is not the only Republican in Congress who has made allegations about the identity of the whistleblower. U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Arizona, retweeted King's original tweet showing four photos of the alleged whistleblower.

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul shared the name of a person he believes could be the whistleblower on a conservative talk radio show Wednesday. The person "needs to be pulled in for testimony" to clarify whether they are indeed the whistleblower, Paul said.

The organization employing the person pictured on King's social media also released a statement that King was circulating false information.

This isn't King's first time weighing in on the impeachment process. Last month, he joined other Republican House members in a protest over the secrecy of impeachment inquiry testimony by the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Reform committees.

King does not sit on any House committees. He was removed from his assignments by House Republicans after comments he made to the New York Times about white nationalism and white supremacy.

Iowa's Republican U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst have said politicians should not try to reveal the identity of the whistleblower, in accordance with federal law. In a call with reporters in November, Grassley argued that the whistleblower's identity does not matter as impeachment hearings proceed.

"I don’t know whether the whistleblower’s very darn important when what the president has done in two instances: one, released the whistleblowers’ comments and, secondly, released the transcript of the telephone call with the president of Ukraine," Grassley said.

https://www.press-citizen.com/story...esident-donald-trump-ukraine-iowa/4195065002/
How embarrassing for decent Iowans.

Assuming there are some decent Iowans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Just a reminder to Grassley's point - there is no "transcript" of the call despite what he and Trump keep saying.

"We understand a “transcript” to be a complete record of an entire conversation, so calling this document a transcript forces us to wonder what’s been left out.

What’s more, some experts who work with recordings make note of pauses, changes in pitch, facial expressions or body movements that accompany talk, and even then, they are constantly aware that certain aspects of the original conversation will never make it into even the most detailed transcript. If you’ve ever read a tweet and been uncertain whether it was meant ironically, you’ll understand why they bother—all of these things give us vital information about what people are saying, just as much as the words they use."

https://qz.com/1717869/why-its-wrong-to-call-the-white-house-ukraine-memo-a-transcript/
 
We'll never, ever, hear the exact convo. And it won't have anything to do with being "classified".

There was likely some really shady shit from Trump's side. Corruption is bad, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
By Bret Hayworth, Sioux City Journal
U.S. Rep. Steve King posted photos Thursday of the son of prominent Democratic Party donor George Soros, falsely claiming he’s the White House whistleblower.

In the morning, King directed a tweet at House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is leading an impeachment inquiry into charges that President Donald Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate the family of political rival Joe Biden in exchange for military aid.

An unidentified whistleblower’s complaint about Trump’s July phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy prompted the inquiry.

“Adam Schiff said, I do not know the identity of the whistleblower. @RepAdamSchiff here are four strong clues,” King said in a tweet along with photos of Alexander Soros posing with former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren.

A number of journalists and others quickly responded to King’s post, pointing out that Soros could not possibly be the whistleblower because he does not work in the federal government or a U.S. intelligence agency.

Alexander Soros later took to Twitter to shoot down King’s claim. “Pretty sad that a member of Congress @SteveKingIA promoted the crazy lie and conspiracy theory that I am the whistleblower. The whistleblower has to be a government employee.”

Just before 1 p.m., King deleted his tweet and then posted a new one, with three new photos of a man he suggested is the whistleblower.



“Adam Schiff said, ‘I do not know the identity of the whistleblower.’ Me either, but @RepAdamSchiff here’s a better clue,” King tweeted. He did not name the man in the photos, but they appeared to resemble a CIA official that some individuals have publicly identified as the whistleblower.

Twitter has allowed the name and supposed photos of the purported whistleblower, while Facebook and Google have said they would remove such references.

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Thursday named the suspected whistleblower in a radio interview, and the person’s name has been posted on several websites, though no official vertification has been given.

King’s tweet came a day after the opening of public impeachment hearings in the House. Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee have pressed Schiff to require the whistleblower to testify.

Iowa’s two Republican senators, Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, recently said they think the identity of the whistleblower should be kept confidential, in accordance with federal law designed to prevent retaliation.

https://www.thegazette.com/steve-king-whistleblower-photos-20191114
 
Just a reminder to Grassley's point - there is no "transcript" of the call despite what he and Trump keep saying.

"We understand a “transcript” to be a complete record of an entire conversation, so calling this document a transcript forces us to wonder what’s been left out.

What’s more, some experts who work with recordings make note of pauses, changes in pitch, facial expressions or body movements that accompany talk, and even then, they are constantly aware that certain aspects of the original conversation will never make it into even the most detailed transcript. If you’ve ever read a tweet and been uncertain whether it was meant ironically, you’ll understand why they bother—all of these things give us vital information about what people are saying, just as much as the words they use."

https://qz.com/1717869/why-its-wrong-to-call-the-white-house-ukraine-memo-a-transcript/

Didn't the WH even use the term "summary" to describe what they released? I mean, even the WH, at least initially, didn't call it an official transcript. Now they're all over calling it a transcript, which it isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT