ADVERTISEMENT

US Suspends Wuhan Institute Funds Over Covid Stonewalling

NorthDSMHawk

HB Heisman
Oct 24, 2016
7,076
14,463
113
Ankeny
Politics

US Suspends Wuhan Institute Funds Over Covid Stonewalling​


July 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM EDT

The Biden administration has halted the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s access to federal funding after the lab failed to provide documents about safety and security measures, according to a memo obtained by Bloomberg News.

The Department of Health and Human Services notified the Wuhan Institute on Monday of the suspension, and also told the lab it’s seeking to cut it off permanently, according to the memo. HHS found, after a review that began last September, that the facility, based in Wuhan, China, isn’t compliant with federal regulations.

The action guarantees that the institute won’t receive any more federal funding, an HHS spokesperson said in an emailed statement. The lab hasn’t received money from the National Institutes of Health since July 2020.

Penalizing the lab is the most drastic action the US has taken so far over its failure to share documentation on biosafety practices amid ongoing investigations into Covid-19’s origins. The institute has became become a flashpoint in discussions of how the pandemic, which has killed some 7 million people, started, with some, including FBI Director Christopher Wray, suspecting it could have originated at the facility.

Though the US hasn’t found any conclusive evidence that the virus emerged either through animal-to-human transmission or a lab accident, it has identified significant breaches in safety and security protocol at the Wuhan Institute. The US has also accused China and the lab of stonewalling investigations into those shortcomings.

2014 Grant In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a US-based organization focused on preventing infectious diseases, for “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” The Wuhan Institute of Virology received a subaward of that grant.

EcoHealth Alliance also funneled US Agency for International Development funds to the lab.

Earlier this year, HHS’s Office of Inspector General conducted an audit that determined that the NIH and EcoHealth Alliance didn’t effectively monitor awards and subawards, limiting their ability to understand the nature of research conducted and identify problem areas.
The institute’s leadership hasn’t yet responded to the US government since its decision to make the lab ineligible for future federal awards, including new contracts, grants and other transactions, the HHS spokesperson said.

The lab won’t be able to conduct any business with US as an agent or representative of others, and its affiliation with any organization that does business with the federal government will also be carefully examined.

The Wuhan lab can, however, contest the suspension and proposed debarment. An HHS debarment is a relatively rare event: The agency debarred 15 entities in 2020, according to its most recent public report on the actions.

The HHS reached its decision to suspend and potentially debar the lab independently of the US intelligence community, which has long been investigating the novel coronavirus’s emergence in Wuhan in late 2019.

Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a declassified report that identified safety and security issues at the institute that could have increased the risk of accidental exposure to viruses. Still, the intelligence community said it’s not aware of a specific biosafety incident that may have spurred the pandemic.

That report came months after President Joe Biden signed a bill into law requiring declassification of intelligence related to the pandemic’s potential links to the lab.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...wuhan-institute-funds-over-covid-stonewalling
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
Classic government response. Of little to no use and only 4 years too late to actually be of use to anyone.
 
Well that is boringly effective governance. Great news.
It’s effective governance to not adequately monitor what grant funding is being used for and finally threatening to pull the plug three years after a major pandemic forced them to audit what was happening at the facility and getting the runaround from those receiving the funding?

K.
 
It’s effective governance to not adequately monitor what grant funding is being used for and finally threatening to pull the plug three years after a major pandemic forced them to audit what was happening at the facility and getting the runaround from those receiving the funding?

K.

Did you even read the article you linked?
 
That's when Obama ordered no more gain of function in the US, and Fauci (via EcoHealth Alliance) moved testing to China.

So the US should continue to allow funding to go to that lab?

I have no idea what your point is other than, it would have been better if different decisions were made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI_NYC and Ree4
Lol, I did. I even pasted it here. What points, specifically, are you arguing?

I'm not arguing anything, I expressed support for funding to be permanently banned for that lab. It seems prudent given it's likely role in the pandemic.

The reason I assumed that you hadn't read the article you linked because you explicitly stated that this decision was three years too late to help anyone when the article clearly states that the lab had been cut off of funding within months of Biden taking office in 2020.

And before you get the cart ahead of the horse, I've also said that to expect the prior administration to have the type of clairvoyance to cut this off before it became a problem is unrealistic.
 
It came from the lab....
Of course it did. There's a huge difference in open source reports vs classified and/or heavily redacted reports on this topic. Sad part is too many people want to gobble up whatever the standard line is that's pushed via media outlets and never once consider they're not being fed told the truth.
Zero evidence
That you, the general public, have been made aware of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: binsfeldcyhawk2
I'm not arguing anything, I expressed support for funding to be permanently banned for that lab. It seems prudent given it's likely role in the pandemic.

The reason I assumed that you hadn't read the article you linked because you explicitly stated that this decision was three years too late to help anyone when the article clearly states that the lab had been cut off of funding within months of Biden taking office in 2020.

And before you get the cart ahead of the horse, I've also said that to expect the prior administration to have the type of clairvoyance to cut this off before it became a problem is unrealistic.
That’s what you’re going with? Haha, ok.
 
Hate the guy but he was saying it was a lab leak and calling it the China virus, and the left and media attacked him. Members of the medical community came out saying it was a lab leak and were chastised by social media. Everything is political

Duh, that was some third grade level leadership. His guess may bear out to be true, but it won't do a damn bit of good unless there is more than a crazy man shouting insults about it.

Proof and a coalition of nations will to be required to make hay of any accusation as serious as killing 7 million people worldwide and then lying about it. Being right is about as useless as an @sshole on your elbow if your geopolitical strategy is to just scream sh!t and make up nicknames.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI_NYC and Ree4
Duh, that was some third grade level leadership. His guess may bear out to be true, but it won't do a damn bit of good unless there is more than a crazy man shouting insults about it.

Proof and a coalition of nations will to be required to make hay of any accusation as serious as killing 7 million people worldwide and then lying about it. Being right is about as useless as an @sshole on your elbow if your geopolitical strategy is to just scream sh!t and make up nicknames.
Thanks Jerome.
 
Of course it did. There's a huge difference in open source reports vs classified and/or heavily redacted reports on this topic. Sad part is too many people want to gobble up whatever the standard line is that's pushed via media outlets and never once consider they're not being fed told the truth.

That you, the general public, have been made aware of.
IMO, even if they do know, they might not ever tell the public. I think they know and this is an indirect way of admitting it. I honestly don’t care either way, wet market or lab. It’s concerning that it’s made political and some people have no problems being lied to by our government and media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alaskanseminole
Thanks Jerome.
Arnold Schwarzenegger No Prob GIF
 
Of course it did. There's a huge difference in open source reports vs classified and/or heavily redacted reports on this topic. Sad part is too many people want to gobble up whatever the standard line is that's pushed via media outlets and never once consider they're not being fed told the truth.

That you, the general public, have been made aware of.
What information do you have to make this statement?
 
You should ask Christopher Wray.

You didn’t learn from the last thread you started on this.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: alaskanseminole
It’s effective governance to not adequately monitor what grant funding is being used for and finally threatening to pull the plug three years after a major pandemic forced them to audit what was happening at the facility and getting the runaround from those receiving the funding?

K.
After lying and saying we weren't funding gain of function research at the lab. Good thing we are suspending funding to something we never funded
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Stoopsbrother
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT