ADVERTISEMENT

Vatican officially recognizes the ‘State of Palestine’

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,423
62,528
113
The Vatican concluded a treaty Wednesday that formally recognizes Palestinian statehood, a step that immediately drew criticism from the Israeli government and a warning that it harms the Middle East peace process.

The treaty concludes work by the Bilateral Commission of the Holy See and the State of Palestine and “deals with essential aspects of the life and activity of the Catholic Church in Palestine,” according to a joint statement posted on the Vatican’s Web site.

“Both Parties agreed that the work of the Commission on the text of the Agreement has been concluded, and that the agreement will be submitted to the respective authorities for approval ahead of setting a date in the near future for the signing,” the statement said.

“Yes, it’s a recognition that the state exists,” said the Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Associated Press reported.

Although the Vatican had previously referred unofficially to the “state of Palestine” and had welcomed the U.N. General Assembly’s 2012 decision to recognize such a state, the treaty marked the first time that the Vatican has negotiated a legal document with the Palestinians that constitutes official diplomatic recognition of a Palestinian state. Previously, the Vatican’s diplomatic recognition had been extended to the Palestine Liberation Organization.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry condemned the move, saying it was “disappointed” by it.

“This move does not promote the peace process and distances the Palestinian leadership from returning to direct and bilateral negotiations,” the ministry said in a text message, AP reported. “Israel will study the agreement and will consider its steps accordingly.”

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is scheduled to visit Pope Francis at the Vatican on Saturday ahead of the canonization of two new saints from the Holy Land on Sunday. Abbas previously visited Francis at the Vatican in 2013.

The Vatican has strong religious interests in the Christian holy sites that dot Palestinian territory in the West Bank, which is under Israeli occupation.

A Palestinian spokesman played down the development Wednesday, saying that the Vatican effectively recognized the state of Palestine in 2012 after the U.N. General Assembly accepted it as a non-member observer state.

The spokesman said there has been an ambassador from the state of Palestine at the Holy See for several years and that for at least that long, the Palestinian government has regarded the Vatican as one of the states recognizing Palestine. “Nothing new” occurred in Wednesday’s exchange of documents, the spokesman said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-1bb7ce3b3fb7_story.html?tid=trending_strip_3
 
Probably not too well, but I don't think that crowd thinks too much of Papists to begin with.
 
Didn't take long for the Catholic haters to make an appearance.

Who hates Catholics? I was referring to the red heifer crowd. You can be sure they don't think much of that commie Pope Francis. I think he's the best thing to happen for the Catholic Church in a long time!
 
Who hates Catholics? I was referring to the red heifer crowd. You can be sure they don't think much of that commie Pope Francis. I think he's the best thing to happen for the Catholic Church in a long time!
You call the Pope a commie are you shitting me?
 
I AM "COMPREHENDING"JUST FINE I KNOW WHAT I READ JACKASS.
I don't think you do. you've errored twice in this thread so far. First in assuming ciggy was attacking Catholics, when he was actually complimenting by granting them distinction from the rabid prophetic crowd. Second in thinking he was attacking the Pope, when his real meaning was the opposite. Both may deserve attacks, but that hasn't happened yet.
 
Last edited:
hawkssox, I'm sorry that you think I'm being offensive to Catholics. I know sarcasm is sometimes hard to detect in written words. My intent is to make fun of the red heifer folks seeking to speed up the end times' arrival. It is my depiction of THEIR view of Catholics and the Pope that you have been wrongly ascribing to me.

You can read more about them at:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/readings/forcing.html
 
hawkssox, I'm sorry that you think I'm being offensive to Catholics. I know sarcasm is sometimes hard to detect in written words. My intent is to make fun of the red heifer folks seeking to speed up the end times' arrival. It is my depiction of THEIR view of Catholics and the Pope that you have been wrongly ascribing to me.

You can read more about them at:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/readings/forcing.html
NP I must be having a bad day perception wise.
 
Someone's been watching Dig..
yep, binged through it.
I wasn't quite sure if the magic breast plate was really needed to talk to god or if that's just what they told the yokels to make it important so that it would survive to be used to guide the prophecy. And why would spray paint disqualify the cow? Thats just like getting dirty, it isn't an actual blemish inherent to the creature.
 
yep, binged through it.
I wasn't quite sure if the magic breast plate was really needed to talk to god or if that's just what they told the yokels to make it important so that it would survive to be used to guide the prophecy. And why would spray paint disqualify the cow? Thats just like getting dirty, it isn't an actual blemish inherent to the creature.

Ahh, the breastplate was needed to reveal some hidden location under the Temple Mount remember. As to if it was needed to talk with God, no I don't believe so. They were all crazy.

They were trying to bring the Apocalypse by flooding the sandstone.... Lame. As to your questioning the Heifer, you're right the spray paint wouldn't/shouldn't have had anything to do with blemishing the cow.

Is it weird saying, I bet that red headed chick (Watson) was a tomcat in the sack?
 
Ahh, the breastplate was needed to reveal some hidden location under the Temple Mount remember. As to if it was needed to talk with God, no I don't believe so. They were all crazy.

They were trying to bring the Apocalypse by flooding the sandstone.... Lame. As to your questioning the Heifer, you're right the spray paint wouldn't/shouldn't have had anything to do with blemishing the cow.

Is it weird saying, I bet that red headed chick (Watson) was a tomcat in the sack?
I'm sure you're right on the last part, anyone willing to go to those lengths must have few limits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swagsurfer02
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT