There are insiders who believe Iowa will land Rodriguez. Hopefully, an announcement will be made early in the week.
There are insiders who believe Iowa will land Rodriguez. Hopefully, an announcement will be made early in the week.
There are insiders who believe Iowa will land Rodriguez. Hopefully, an announcement will be made early in the week.
Never said that, and theres a big difference between bringing in a recruit when from high school who will be several years behind a current player and a portal player. By then Mallegni will be ajunior, and she'll have had the chance to develop. I've also stated many times that Jans job like all the HC's is to always try to recruit better talent all the time then you have. Still its tricky, especially in the portal where you have to question if players are long term answers or one year rentals...So should Jan not pursue Bjorn or Wolizcko? They would certainly both start as freshmen (likely at the 3 & 4).
This is certainly another side effect of "the Caitlin Clark" era. She changed the expectation of what Iowa basketball could be. Kind of what Kirk did (maybe to a lesser degree) in that 2002-2005 stretch. Then your fighting to live up to the new expectations of just what IS possible. Jan certainly has a lot on her plate. Dream job or not she's probably the first womens coach to take the HC job where almost anything below a sweet 16 and a run at the B1G is going to be considered a down year going forward.I want a core of good players as well, You feel you get to know them even though we really don’t. It’s very easy to cheer for players that come and stick with the process. But again the pressure is on to win and win a lot. Definitely a tough balancing act.
Do you know how many other programs have that is expectation though? Why is that not the norm of championship culture?This is certainly another side effect of "the Caitlin Clark" era. She changed the expectation of what Iowa basketball could be. Kind of what Kirk did (maybe to a lesser degree) in that 2002-2005 stretch. Then your fighting to live up to the new expectations of just what IS possible. Jan certainly has a lot on her plate. Dream job or not she's probably the first womens coach to take the HC job where almost anything below a sweet 16 and a run at the B1G is going to be considered a down year going forward.
She's visiting NC State tomorrow, but, hopefully just a backup plan.There are insiders who believe Iowa will land Rodriguez. Hopefully, an announcement will be made early in the week.
That can't be good.She's visiting NC State tomorrow, but, hopefully just a backup plan.
She's visiting NC State tomorrow, but, hopefully just a backup plan.
That can't be good.
The more I ponder this question the more I find myself on the side of getting the best players you can each year. I also 100% agree with nu2u about cultural fit. With portal additions now I think every high school player you recruit should be expected to be a multiyear starter.I sympathize with this position and wish that I could endorse it.
With the current environment, especially considering the large volume of annual transfers,I now believe it is incumbent upon a HC to optimize the roster each and every season even if that increases the possibility that current roster player(s) may transfer out. If JJ believes ER improves the roster and the likelihood of winnng this year, you bring her on board. If Mallegni transfers so be it.
…..with one caveat: the incoming transfer must be a good cultural fit (ala Feuerbach, Davis, Olsen).
Rk | Player | Yr | Pos | G | GS | MP | PTS | Status |
2 | Zoe Brooks | So | G | 34 | 34 | 31.8 | 14.2 | Starting G |
5 | Zamareya Jones | Fr | G | 30 | 2 | 16.8 | 7.1 | Starting G |
6 | Tilda Trygger | Fr | F | 34 | 23 | 22.2 | 6.6 | Starting Big |
7 | Lorena Awou | Fr | C | 31 | 0 | 8.8 | 3.2 | |
8 | Mallory Collier | So | C | 29 | 11 | 11.4 | 3.1 | |
9 | Devyn Quigley | Fr | G | 33 | 0 | 8.4 | 2.5 | |
12 | Maddie Cox | So | F | 30 | 0 | 7.9 | 0.8 |
Player | Pos | Height | My #29 Ranked Incoming Class | |
1 | Adelaide Jernigan | 5' 11" | G | Avg Rank #56.20; ESPN #68 |
2 | Destiny Lunan | 5'9" | G | Avg Rank #64.60; ESPN #65 |
Rk | Player | Yr | Pos | G | GS | MP | PTS | Status |
- | None | | | | |
Rk | Outgoing Players | Yr | Pos | G | GS | MP | PTS | Status |
1 | Aziaha James | Sr | G | 35 | 34 | 31.1 | 17.9 | → Not Eligible |
3 | Saniya Rivers | Sr | G | 35 | 35 | 34.1 | 11.9 | → Not Eligible |
4 | Madison Hayes | Sr | G | 35 | 35 | 32.1 | 10.9 | → Not Eligible |
10 | Laci Steele | So | G | 23 | 0 | 6.9 | 1.7 | → Wisconsin |
11 | Lizzy Williamson | Sr | C | 5 | 1 | 6.8 | 1.6 | → Oregon St |
Team | Rank |
NC State | 10 |
Iowa | 16 |
Indiana | NR |
Player | Pos | Height | My #8 Ranked Incoming Class | |
1 | Addie Deal | 6'0" | CG | Avg Rank #13.33; ESPN #23 |
2 | Layla Hays | 6'5" | C | Avg Rank #46.17; ESPN #71 |
3 | Journey Houston | 5'11" | G | Avg Rank #47.75; ESPN #NR |
Player | Pos | Height | My #28 Ranked Incoming Class | |
1 | Maya Makalusky | 6'3" | W | Avg Rank #45.50; ESPN #35 |
2 | Nevaeh Caffey | 5'10" | G | Avg Rank #69.75; ESPN #42 |
Player | Pos | Height | My #29 Ranked Incoming Class | |
1 | Adelaide Jernigan | 5'11" | G | Avg Rank #56.20; ESPN #68 |
2 | Destiny Lunan | 5'9" | G | Avg Rank #64.60; ESPN #65 |
Maybe her NIL has a clause that she's the DD.
Guess the OWI issue isn't a problem. Wonder if the video with Kevin was after the incident?
This recruiting victory over NC State is a big win. State has been to 6 Sweet 16s in the last 7 tourneys, an Elite 8, and a Final Four. State should be good again next year, and has an open spot for Rodriguez. State also plays much more off the bounce than Iowa, which also seems to fit Rodriguez. A big recruiting win for Iowa.WTH? My god this is magic act by Jan/crew and Brad. She had 2 teams with a guaranteed starting position in each of them. To come to a team with less than a clear path to start, tells me she wants to win! We landed a winner here folks!
I doubt absolute promises are made but both should get major minutes. Rodriguez must have liked the sales pitch. Wright is virtual lock to start. Rodriguez has to be a likely start.Jan got the two she wanted to fill the main gaps she saw.
The portal is officially closed...Elvis has left the building!
That was a really quick visit to North Carolina State. I don't think this EJ guy is very well connected.
Watching Emely's highlights leaves me thinking she might start next season.WTH? My god this is magic act by Jan/crew and Brad. She had 2 teams with a guaranteed starting position in each of them. To come to a team with less than a clear path to start, tells me she wants to win! We landed a winner here folks!
Assuming she stays healthy, I believe Deal starts every game during her Iowa career. She is as close to Caitlin as we are going to get.I think Chit Chat, Rodriguez and Stuelke start. I think Feuerbach probably starts given her experience and defense. Then it depends on if they want to continue to play small ball and start Deal or if they want to go big and start Heiden. Stremlow seems like she’ll be great continuing to come off the bench.
I doubt absolute promises are made but both should get major minutes. Rodriguez must have liked the sales pitch. Wright is virtual lock to start. Rodriguez has to be a likely start.
Watching Emely's highlights leaves me thinking she might start next season.
I think Chit Chat, Rodriguez and Stuelke start. I think Feuerbach probably starts given her experience and defense. Then it depends on if they want to continue to play small ball and start Deal or if they want to go big and start Heiden. Stremlow seems like she’ll be great continuing to come off the bench.
Not to mention losing to Indiana would have just been embarrassing considering how differently the two teams have trended the past few 2-3 years.This recruiting victory over NC State is a big win. State has been to 6 Sweet 16s in the last 7 tourneys, an Elite 8, and a Final Four. State should be good again next year, and has an open spot for Rodriguez. State also plays much more off the bounce than Iowa, which also seems to fit Rodriguez. A big recruiting win for Iowa.
That is a big, athletic line-up. I love it.The starting lineup will be:
This is going to be a very athletic lineup with size.
- PG: Deal
- SG: Feuerbach
- SF: Rodriguez
- PF: Stuelke
- C: Heiden
Not to mention losing to Indiana would have just been embarrassing considering how differently the two teams have trended the past few 2-3 years.
look at any team like S. Caroline, Conn, and more. They have competition at most position and sometimes some of their better players do not start. Now, it is up to the coaches to help each player understand their position to be the best team they can be. Not always easy with certain player's egos, but to be the best you need the competition. I am sure the coaches would rather have the problem of who to start than not having all the players.How do we see this playing out for starting spots as we see it today? I do not have all the answers on this one because it is not clear to me Emely has the auto greenlight yet.
Believe there's two lineups I see here.
Lineup 1:
1 & 2) - Deal & Chit-Chat interchangeable
3 Kylie
4 Hannah
5 Heiden
I got the feeling Jan was leaning this way before Emely's commit.
Lineup 2:
1) Deal
2) Kylie
3) Emely
4) Hannah
5) Heiden
I'd be surprised if McCabe hangs on to starting spot. She can't score on the move/bounce like Chit-Chat and Emely can. Plus, I always thought McCabe plays better coming off the bench.
Maybe someone is seeing a better lineup I'm missing? Maybe Deal doesn't start but I'd have to hear in camp she's not there yet before I go that far. I also don't see a starting lineup without Heiden either. Maybe this will go by an opponent by opponent match up as well.
Anyways, the good thing about this is we have choices and whoever works their tall off should get the nod. Plus, starting isn't the holy grail in Jan's world. Whoever comes to play that night gets more mins.
If Houston redshirts, I don’t see a logjam. A minute distribution challenge for sure.Will there be be a 2-3 log jam at Iowa?
Why would Houston redshirt?If Houston redshirts, I don’t see a logjam. A minute distribution challenge for sure.
How do we see this playing out for starting spots as we see it today? I do not have all the answers on this one because it is not clear to me Emely has the auto greenlight yet.
Believe there's two lineups I see here.
Lineup 1:
1 & 2) - Deal & Chit-Chat interchangeable
3 Kylie
4 Hannah
5 Heiden
I got the feeling Jan was leaning this way before Emely's commit.
Lineup 2:
1) Deal
2) Kylie
3) Emely
4) Hannah
5) Heiden
I'd be surprised if McCabe hangs on to starting spot. She can't score on the move/bounce like Chit-Chat and Emely can. Plus, I always thought McCabe plays better coming off the bench.
Maybe someone is seeing a better lineup I'm missing? Maybe Deal doesn't start but I'd have to hear in camp she's not there yet before I go that far. I also don't see a starting lineup without Heiden either. Maybe this will go by an opponent by opponent match up as well.
Anyways, the good thing about this is we have choices and whoever works their tall off should get the nod. Plus, starting isn't the holy grail in Jan's world. Whoever comes to play that night gets more mins.
I think it will be very tough to pry Ragone away from Lousiville -- her parents were both athletes there (her mom played basketball specifically). Meanwhile the path to landing Harpring will be even tougher considering she is a top 2 pick. Many terminally online people assume she is headed to ND or UConn without mention of Iowa. But landing Barrett can't hurt with either -- especially with Harpring, since they certainly already had a relationship.I want to give a shoutout to Boogie Barrett. It's like she came in and cranked up a dim light to full-bore. The likelihood of picking up 2 SE portal players would almost be non-existent. Maybe under Stringer it could happen easier. I didn't see this coming this soon. Since coming on board, she has injected some life into our portal successes. Are Harpring and Ragone the next 2 from the SE to join this Boogie train?
It didn't look good there at the start of portal season. So a shoutout to Jan as well for bringing on this homerun hire and turning the portal season into a win. Hopefully this is just a crystal ball into what is possible for the Class of '26.
I'm with you on the 4 starters and it will take time to determine the 5th starter along with who is 6th 7th 8th 9th. I lean toward Chit Chat as the 5th starter for ball handling and speed/quickness. I don't expect Journey to be in the mix for many minutes her first year with all the other players having more experience.I'm actually a little surprised by the Rodriguez commitment, but it's true--Jensen has a good "team" to sell, so perhaps that helped.
Deal is starting. 1 or 2 depending on CCW. (She will probably lead in scoring as well.)
Feuerbach starting
Stuelke starting
Heiden starting
The open position is going to be whomever separates between Rodriguez, Mallegni, Houston. Right now, it appears as Rodriguez, but you never know what can happen over the next 4/5 months. Wouldn't count out Stremlow, and you still may need McCabe to spread the floor if nobody can hit their 3s.
A log jam of minutes to spread, but I expect this team to run run run, so that might work out. Going to be some battles for time on the court. Hope they can bond well and make each other better.
Yeah, probably Chit-Chat. Ball handling may very well be the decider, and given the speed of the college game, they will need her on the court. I believe you are right about Houston, but I hate discounting a player until they show up and compete. So, four players subbing the 1,2,3,4, with Stuelke bouncing over to the 5 to rest Heiden. Going to like this team.I'm with you on the 4 starters and it will take time to determine the 5th starter along with who is 6th 7th 8th 9th. I lean toward Chit Chat as the 5th starter for ball handling and speed/quickness. I don't expect Journey to be in the mix for many minutes her first year with all the other players having more experience.