That theory might make sense if people on the right were actually talking about Covid these daysAre you oblivious to how many MAGAs jump onboard and post outdated/false propaganda links about it?
Any idea how much America's Frontline Doctors made in $100 and 200 "prescription referrals" for it? It's in the tens of millions.
That theory might make sense if people on the right were actually talking about Covid these days
That theory might make sense if people on the right were actually talking about Covid these days
OP didn't say otherwise. He was asking that the obsession with an unproven therapy is.Who cares?
If people want to take it, let them.
It’s easy. And the same for all of the things with them.OP didn't say otherwise. He was asking that the obsession with an unproven therapy is.
So maybe a better thread title would have been ‘What’s up with lib’s obsession with the maga obsession over ivermectin?’Obsession? The only times and places I see the word ivermectin is in threads like this and when I pass the animal therapeutics section at my local farm coop store.
So maybe a better thread title would have been ‘What’s up with lib’s obsession with the maga obsession over ivermectin?’
Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug - PMC
Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
That theory might make sense if people on the right were actually talking about Covid these days
Don’t know. Don’t care. I don’t take pharmaceuticals because they’re all toxic.You think NewsMax Matt’s 10% off of Ivermectin code work for libs too?
P.S. the code is MATT10. I heard it will help with your hemorrhoids and early onset dementia. Probably makes your peen bigger too. You can thank me anytime.
The real problem is that there are so damn many of them.Time and again maga obsesses over the most bizarre stuff. And believes anything on social media that lines up with their views. Trans was their huge deal, some even are obsessed with sexual fantasies about Pelosi and Biden. Very odd folks.
Don’t know. Don’t care. I don’t take pharmaceuticals because they’re all toxic.
But back to the topic, it appears that it’s the libs who are oddly obsessed with ivermectin. 🤷♂️
Search results for query: Ivermectin
iowa.forums.rivals.com
Does Zuckerberg agree that FB should be held liable if it pushes quack bullshit and people get killed? That's the price of free speech...responsibility. You wouldn't understand that, of course.Zuckerberg came out this week and turned on Biden and admitted the WH demanded they take down various content pertaining to therapeutics, vaccine injury, alternative medicine with threat of repercussion. Zuckerberg’s own words described the WH actions as illegal. Not a good look for the Biden presidency going into its last week.
People want to be free to determine their own care without the government subsidizing and shoving a single “cure” down its throat.
Does Zuckerberg agree that FB should be held liable if it pushes quack bullshit and people get killed? That's the price of free speech...responsibility. You wouldn't understand that, of course.
Wasnt she charged with killing her hisband?IIRC, someone drank aquarium cleaner and died from it...
The assertion that covid vaccines can ‘short circuit’ neurotransmitters to/in the brain seems to have some merit.Phuck yeah brother! Totes makes sense. When I think unmedicated HORTers you’re on the list. Stay clean bub!
The assertion that covid vaccines can ‘short circuit’ neurotransmitters to/in the brain seems to have some merit.
The assertion that covid vaccines can ‘short circuit’ neurotransmitters to/in the brain seems to have some merit.
But I’m sure YOU’LL be fine.
🫠
The assertion that covid vaccines can ‘short circuit’ neurotransmitters to/in the brain seems to have some merit.
Obsession? The only times and places I see the word ivermectin is in threads like this and when I pass the animal therapeutics section at my local farm coop store.
Don’t know. Don’t care. I don’t take pharmaceuticals because they’re all toxic.
But back to the topic, it appears that it’s the libs who are oddly obsessed with ivermectin. 🤷♂️
Search results for query: Ivermectin
iowa.forums.rivals.com
Of course not. And that’s not the issue.Does Zuckerberg agree that FB should be held liable if it pushes quack bullshit and people get killed? That's the price of free speech...responsibility. You wouldn't understand that, of course.
Of course not. And that’s not the issue.
The issue is government censorship with the executive branch threatening a social media platform with repercussions.Except, it is the issue.
Lots of people skipped vaccines and proven medicines for snake oil.
We posted examples of them, regularly, during Covid, when HCWs explained to them that it was "too late" for the vaccines when they were about to be intubated for Covid.
The topic here was "ivermectin" and MAGA-world disinformation on its use against Covid.The issue is government censorship with the executive branch threatening a social media platform with repercussions.
The conversation pivoted pretty early in this thread to government censorship. Keep up.The topic here was "ivermectin" and MAGA-world disinformation on its use against Covid.
Does it also make gay people straight? 🥴You think NewsMax Matt’s 10% off of Ivermectin code work for libs too?
P.S. the code is MATT10. I heard it will help with your hemorrhoids and early onset dementia. Probably makes your peen bigger too. You can thank me anytime.
Does it also make gay people straight? 🥴
Soooo...free speech with NO responsibility.The issue is government censorship with the executive branch threatening a social media platform with repercussions.
That's not the way it works.
The conversation pivoted pretty early in this thread
possibly caused by vaccination. (European Journal of Medical Research).
That’s why I called it an ‘assertion’, Fluffer Joe.So, no actual evidence, then.