As an ex player this is 100% correct. What's best % wise to win isn't what is best for the entertainment of the game.One trick ponies. No importance placed on being a true professional hitter. Pitchers have adjusted and are throwing unbelievable stuff that is harder to hit but also making them injury prone.
Analytics ruined baseball.
Yeah, there seems to be too many pitchers in the system these days, with pitchers being on a rotational basis between MLB and the high majors. 13 can be on the roster at one time and they have about half a dozen a phone call away from AAA. Maybe they need to limit the number of pitchers on the team at one time to about 10-11 and go back to the way they used to figure call-up options to limit the number of arms that are available. Guys aren't throwing the number of innings they used to.One trick ponies. No importance placed on being a true professional hitter. Pitchers have adjusted and are throwing unbelievable stuff that is harder to hit but also making them injury prone.
Analytics ruined baseball.
One trick ponies. No importance placed on being a true professional hitter. Pitchers have adjusted and are throwing unbelievable stuff that is harder to hit but also making them injury prone.
Analytics ruined baseball.
FIFYOne trick ponies. No importance placed on being a true professional hitter. Pitchers have adjusted and are throwing unbelievable stuff that is harder to hit but also making them injury prone.
Baseball ruined baseball.
.240? Holy Hell, that’s atrocious. Big change is coming.All sports evolve and have cycles of how they are played. In baseball, the last time this happened, they lowered the mound.
Yeah, Gibson pitched 13 Shutouts that year but still lost 9 games (won 22 I think). He and Fergie had some great duels in that era.Pitching is totally different from 68. Gibson had like 25 complete games. Now 5 - 6 innings and the slider/98 mph specialists take over. Defense is way better than ever too….
Yeah, Gibson pitched 13 Shutouts that year but still lost 9 games (won 22 I think). He and Fergie had some great duels in that era.
All of ChicagoI blame the white sox
Yes, when things happen, it’s usually more entertaining than when things don’t happen. It’s science.I hate the ideal we need video game offense to entertain people.
Winding the balls a bit different (looser?) would counter the freakish pitch velocity and spin, and keep batted balls in the park more often. More balls in play=more entertainment?
We must be brothers...totally on the same pageYes, when things happen, it’s usually more entertaining than when things don’t happen. It’s science.
Fergie Jenkins lost six 1-0 games in 1968 and still finished 20-15 with a 2.63 ERA.
Spin rates baby! Don't worry about your arm falling off.One trick ponies. No importance placed on being a true professional hitter. Pitchers have adjusted and are throwing unbelievable stuff that is harder to hit but also making them injury prone.
Analytics ruined baseball.
I want to say it was Bob Nightingale, but on the Score today they were talking about the crackdown on sticky stuff, and perhaps pitchers are being checked before the inning starts, and a defensive players is transferring a substance to the pitcher once the inning starts.
A little dab will do you. This was discussed, they check the hands, not the pants, or jersey. It wears off. And, there could be newer substances that have been utilized instead of the old sticky stuff from 2 years ago. Spin rates still seem radically high.I see them being checked after innings all the time too