They're gonna be a very tough team to beat and a very fun team to watch.
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
They're gonna be a very tough team to beat and a very fun team to watch.
Enjoy.
See, I said when though, which implies this year. Just sayin.........enjoy.I agree. Unfortunately that won't be this year.
Teams that play stout defense are usually teams that are well disciplined in how they play the game. ISU and Iowa are usually not well disciplined teams.At this point in their career, every college basketball player "should" know + understand basic defensive principles. With a few exceptions, I dont think many college coaches put much (if any) value on defense. They will say the right things, but will any coach pull a starter (Jok for example) that is a defensive liability?
It almost seems like the mindset is "we can get the ball back quicker" with their lack of defensive intensity and/or effort. Letting the other team score isnt accurate, but I dont see many teams really "lock down" on defense on a consistent basis. Its hard to watch sometimes. I would prefer a game in the 60s or 70s.
Hoibergs teams at ISU played no defense, and Prohm seems to have carried on the tradition.
When has an Iowa team coached by Fran ever played defense?
When has an Iowa team coached by Fran ever played defense?
I expect EFFORT on the defensive side of the ballLet's not forget who we played the last two games. First a team that has been defensively throttling their opponents and then Memphis whose three Lawson brothers were all top 15 players nationally when they signed. Two very good teams against a very young Hawk team. What did you expect this year?
We're coming along about as I thought, with improvement in bits and pieces. Anyone who thought that this very inexperienced team could go out and whip the biggies right away must have their head screwed on backwards. Most of our team is composed of back-ups from a year ago, benchwarmers from last year, plus a bunch of freshmen who were playing Storm Lake, Cedar Rapids Prairie and Dubuque Hempstead a year ago. The teams that have beat us are far, far more experienced and at this stage, more talented. Even most of the AAU players our young guys played against in high school aren't D1-caliber players. We'll keep learning and keep getting stronger. Even if we had Nunge and Luka Garza (as they are NOW), we'd have about the same result. Kids have to learn how to play at this level.
We are making way too many turnovers, with Jok, Cook and Bohannon today having most of them (12) But the ball was in their hands the most, too. In my estimation, Williams is underperforming and has a long way to go. He is averaging 1 point a game the past two games, shooting about 18%. He has long arms. Great. Bohannon is outplaying him badly, I think, but the shots need to drop for the ex-Linn-Mar star. Our rebounding is okay, but we don't get the offensive rebounds of other teams. Defense is why some kids are playing and some not. The kids not playing are even poorer defenders. Pemsl needs to shoot more. He leads the team in field goal percentage, but is still too cautious offensively. Uhl is starting to wake up, but Baer and Wagner are still a little quiet offensively. Jok and Cook are our main men--on offense. Their defense is not yet stellar by any means.
Things won't get much better against an unranked Notre Dame team, 5-0, and it's at their place. If we play well, we have a chance to win. We are playing a much tougher pre-BIG schedule this year compared to last, and that means more losses, especially with a much less experienced team than last year. At least last year we had more effective guards. Our young guards are on a fast learning slope. Either Christian Williams really steps up, or little Bohannpn will be our point guard.
I like our young team and it'll be fun to watch them grow this year.
The coaches that do play defense, won't let a player like Jok play as a FR or SO if he doesn't play defense. They'll use the bench to make their point early on. But that's basically the difference between coaching philosophies.At this point in their career, every college basketball player "should" know + understand basic defensive principles. With a few exceptions, I dont think many college coaches put much (if any) value on defense. They will say the right things, but will any coach pull a starter (Jok for example) that is a defensive liability?
It almost seems like the mindset is "we can get the ball back quicker" with their lack of defensive intensity and/or effort. Letting the other team score isnt accurate, but I dont see many teams really "lock down" on defense on a consistent basis. Its hard to watch sometimes. I would prefer a game in the 60s or 70s.
Hoibergs teams at ISU played no defense, and Prohm seems to have carried on the tradition.
This^^^^. Great effort doesn't always lead to great defense. But it usually leads to good defense.I expect EFFORT on the defensive side of the ball
Teams that play stout defense are usually teams that are well disciplined in how they play the game. ISU and Iowa are usually not well disciplined teams.
Too early to judge ISU.
This is really the first year this is truely Prohm's team. There is some hope over there.
Correct. There's a difference between being a little weak defensively because of inexperience and playing matador defense where you have guys who are totally indifferent on the defensive end of the court.I expect EFFORT on the defensive side of the ball
I look for several blowouts this year. Even good shooting teams have off nights and outside of Jok I don't think they have a proven scorer (Cook could become one). Plus, teams at the top of the B1G usually play very good D. We saw last year how hard it was to score points the 2nd time playing teams as they knew your tendencies. It's why playing good D in the B1G is so important if you want to finish in the upper level of the conference.Unfortunately a lot of ranked teams will beat the Hawkeye's by 20 or 30 this year until we learn to value the ball and play just a little bit of defense. It doesn't mean we won't be fun to watch on offense, but we won't win many games. On the positive side we are showing some improvement on the boards. If we could make a similar jump on the defensive end we could have a chance to get a few against better teams.
I look for several blowouts this year. Even good shooting teams have off nights and outside of Jok I don't think they have a proven scorer (Cook could become one). Plus, teams at the top of the B1G usually play very good D. We saw last year how hard it was to score points the 2nd time playing teams as they knew your tendencies. It's why playing good D in the B1G is so important if you want to finish in the upper level of the conference.
Yes, and so will every other team in the country.We had key turnovers in our last two games, and poor shooting.
They will get better.
You should be able to put the ball in the hoop and play good D. However, you don't need a bunch of stars to be a very good defender. It's not an either/or. Think baseball. The Cubs had the best offense in baseball, they also had the best defense. Sparty and Wis usually always play excellent defense, and they can score when they need to score.I do agree about playing good D but there is a risk at the moment of getting our best 2 offensive players in foul trouble. Put Jok & Cook on the bench and I am not sure who will score it yet.
When I watched Nebraska the last couple of years with Coach Miles he puts a lot of emphasis on D but they have been brutally bad at sticking the ball in the hoop, sometimes painfully bad. They had that one good year but have lost a lot of games since because they could not score enough.
The point is there is a balance where you need to score but also be able to play good enough D at times to hang in there during a scoring drought or preventing the big runs by your opponent. That's what this young group is not able to do yet. Against Memphis we got up 65-60 then gave up a 17-2 run or something like that.... ball game. That's where picking up the D was needed.
What makes you think they'll learn to play defense?They're gonna be a very tough team to beat and a very fun team to watch.
Enjoy.
What makes you think they'll learn to play defense?
At this point in their career, every college basketball player "should" know + understand basic defensive principles. With a few exceptions, I dont think many college coaches put much (if any) value on defense. They will say the right things, but will any coach pull a starter (Jok for example) that is a defensive liability?
It almost seems like the mindset is "we can get the ball back quicker" with their lack of defensive intensity and/or effort. Letting the other team score isnt accurate, but I dont see many teams really "lock down" on defense on a consistent basis. Its hard to watch sometimes. I would prefer a game in the 60s or 70s.
Hoibergs teams at ISU played no defense, and Prohm seems to have carried on the tradition.