ADVERTISEMENT

White House press secretary violated Hatch Act, watchdog agency finds

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre violated the Hatch Act, a law that bars federal employees from promoting partisan politics while in their official capacity, for how she spoke about Republicans during official White House press briefings, a government watchdog agency found. But the agency also did not recommend any reprimand.


The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that enforces the act, cited Jean-Pierre’s use of the phrase “mega MAGA Republicans” during news briefings leading up to the 2022 midterms as being in violation of the 1939 law, according to the letter dated June 7.
“Because Ms. Jean‐Pierre made the statements while acting in her official capacity, she violated the Hatch Act prohibition against using her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election,” Ana Galindo‐Marrone, who leads the agency’s Hatch Act Unit, wrote in the letter.


ADVERTISING


The office, however, did not recommend any reprimand, saying that Jean-Pierre may not have been told such phrasing was a violation.
“The White House Counsel’s Office did not at the time believe that Ms. Jean‐Pierre’s remarks were prohibited by the Hatch Act, and it is unclear whether OSC’s contrary analysis regarding the use of ‘MAGA Republicans’ was ever conveyed to Ms. Jean‐Pierre,” the letter stated.
Jean-Pierre has frequently cited the Hatch Act during press briefings, often using it as a reason she cannot answer reporters’ questions. White House spokesman Andrew Bates said Monday that the administration is reviewing the OSC’s opinion.
“As has been made clear throughout the administration, we take the law seriously and uphold the Hatch Act,” Bates said.

In the leadup to the midterm elections, President Biden began using the term “MAGA Republicans” last summer to refer to Republicans who are tied to former president Donald Trump, who announced last fall his campaign to again seek the GOP nomination for the presidency. Presidents are not subject to the Hatch Act, even though their political appointees are.


NBC News first reported the findings.
Protect the Public Trust, a conservative watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel in November that led to the investigation. In its letter to the organization, Galindo-Marrone said it decided to close the investigation into Jean-Pierre without further action.

“We have advised Ms. Jean‐Pierre that should she again engage in prohibited political activity, OSC would consider it a knowing and willful violation of the law that could result in OSC pursuing disciplinary action,” the agency wrote.
Despite the recommendation, Michael Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust, slammed the use of “polarizing messages and demeaning slogans” against political opponents.
“We are glad that there remains some interest in investigating misconduct within the highest levels of government. Officials are supposed to exercise their authority for the benefit of all Americans, not act as an arm of a political party,” Chamberlain said in a statement.



The phrase “Make America Great Again” and the shortened “MAGA” that former president Donald Trump popularized are regularly used by Republicans and Democrats alike. They were frequently referenced in materials produced by the Trump administration, including on the White House website at the time.
A 2021 federal investigation found that at least 13 senior Trump administration officials violated the Hatch Act intentionally by mixing governing with campaigning before the 2020 election.
A scathing 60-page report from the Office of the Special Counsel said that a “willful disregard for the law” was “especially pernicious” during the Trump administration, saying many officials abused their government roles days before the November election. Trump — whose job it was to discipline his political appointees — allowed them to illegally promote his reelection on the job despite warnings to some from ethics officials, the report said.



“This failure to impose discipline created the conditions for what appeared to be a taxpayer-funded campaign apparatus within the upper echelons of the executive branch,” investigators wrote in the report.
A representative for the Office of Special Counsel declined to comment Monday, adding that it is the office’s practice not to publicly release Hatch Act warning letters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
I have to say, it strikes me as a little weird that a White House press secretary would be subject to the hatch act.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huey Grey
The office, however, did not recommend any reprimand, saying that Jean-Pierre may not have been told such phrasing was a violation.

I might believe this. Doubtful, but maybe.

“The White House Counsel’s Office did not at the time believe that Ms. Jean‐Pierre’s remarks were prohibited by the Hatch Act....

This is harder to believe.

Or is it?

Does context matter?

"Mega MAGA Republicans" wouldn't be considered a disparaging, partisan comment at a Trump rally. It would be a compliment.

How about if Trump's White House press secretary said it at a briefing. Would it still be a violation of the Hatch Act?

What if Karine Jean-Pierre referred to some folks as "very Republican" or "right wing Republican"? Would those also be violations?

Can we assume partisan intent because of the party affiliation of the speaker - even when the statement is objectively correct? Because if the statement is objectively correct and we can't assume partisan intent, then how can it be a violation?
 
The white house represents everyone, not just the party that holds it.
I mean, I get it, but the reality is that the job (both the president and his press secretary) is just as intensely political as pretty much anything that exists in nature. And that's before you even get to the press corps' 'gotcha' approach to questioning.

Even though I don't think she's particularly good at her job, I just have a really hard time begrudging her using the phrase "maga" without it being a hatch act violation
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Surprised that is a hatch act violation. But, eh she’s not great at her job…that’s for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre violated the Hatch Act, a law that bars federal employees from promoting partisan politics while in their official capacity, for how she spoke about Republicans during official White House press briefings, a government watchdog agency found. But the agency also did not recommend any reprimand.


The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that enforces the act, cited Jean-Pierre’s use of the phrase “mega MAGA Republicans” during news briefings leading up to the 2022 midterms as being in violation of the 1939 law, according to the letter dated June 7.
“Because Ms. Jean‐Pierre made the statements while acting in her official capacity, she violated the Hatch Act prohibition against using her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election,” Ana Galindo‐Marrone, who leads the agency’s Hatch Act Unit, wrote in the letter.


ADVERTISING


The office, however, did not recommend any reprimand, saying that Jean-Pierre may not have been told such phrasing was a violation.
“The White House Counsel’s Office did not at the time believe that Ms. Jean‐Pierre’s remarks were prohibited by the Hatch Act, and it is unclear whether OSC’s contrary analysis regarding the use of ‘MAGA Republicans’ was ever conveyed to Ms. Jean‐Pierre,” the letter stated.
Jean-Pierre has frequently cited the Hatch Act during press briefings, often using it as a reason she cannot answer reporters’ questions. White House spokesman Andrew Bates said Monday that the administration is reviewing the OSC’s opinion.
“As has been made clear throughout the administration, we take the law seriously and uphold the Hatch Act,” Bates said.

In the leadup to the midterm elections, President Biden began using the term “MAGA Republicans” last summer to refer to Republicans who are tied to former president Donald Trump, who announced last fall his campaign to again seek the GOP nomination for the presidency. Presidents are not subject to the Hatch Act, even though their political appointees are.


NBC News first reported the findings.
Protect the Public Trust, a conservative watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel in November that led to the investigation. In its letter to the organization, Galindo-Marrone said it decided to close the investigation into Jean-Pierre without further action.

“We have advised Ms. Jean‐Pierre that should she again engage in prohibited political activity, OSC would consider it a knowing and willful violation of the law that could result in OSC pursuing disciplinary action,” the agency wrote.
Despite the recommendation, Michael Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust, slammed the use of “polarizing messages and demeaning slogans” against political opponents.
“We are glad that there remains some interest in investigating misconduct within the highest levels of government. Officials are supposed to exercise their authority for the benefit of all Americans, not act as an arm of a political party,” Chamberlain said in a statement.



The phrase “Make America Great Again” and the shortened “MAGA” that former president Donald Trump popularized are regularly used by Republicans and Democrats alike. They were frequently referenced in materials produced by the Trump administration, including on the White House website at the time.
A 2021 federal investigation found that at least 13 senior Trump administration officials violated the Hatch Act intentionally by mixing governing with campaigning before the 2020 election.
A scathing 60-page report from the Office of the Special Counsel said that a “willful disregard for the law” was “especially pernicious” during the Trump administration, saying many officials abused their government roles days before the November election. Trump — whose job it was to discipline his political appointees — allowed them to illegally promote his reelection on the job despite warnings to some from ethics officials, the report said.



“This failure to impose discipline created the conditions for what appeared to be a taxpayer-funded campaign apparatus within the upper echelons of the executive branch,” investigators wrote in the report.
A representative for the Office of Special Counsel declined to comment Monday, adding that it is the office’s practice not to publicly release Hatch Act warning letters.
I want her to get the exact same consequences that members of the Trump administration got.
 
No,.. they're saying it's political.
Well, so is democrat, republican, conservative, liberal, etc. What's the big deal with this? Seems to me someone is degrading the name of a political group. I've never heard a MAGA Republican get upset with being called so. They wear the name and phrase on shirts and hats.
 
13 members of Trump’s administration violated the Hatch Act in 2020 alone. Including McEnany. So like I said, I demand the same consequences now.
You demand that Joe Biden goes on a Twitter spree and fundraises off if this shocking WITCH HUNT!!!
She messed up, I assume an apology will be offered, or at least an acknowledgement, and the competent Biden Administration will move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
The white house represents everyone, not just the party that holds it.
Wait a dadgum minute! How can that be!?

tdy_miguel_protests_161110__752493.jpg


biden-1.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT