Well if we're all part of NATO...
If Greenland passed an independence referendum how would they be associated with NATO?...
Well if we're all part of NATO...
Agreed. Not where my focus would be.36 trillion.
I did not mean to imply we would sacrifice Ukraine as part of this.Russia has no chip manufacturing. Their ambition is to claw back former satellites and hoard resources. Spotting them Ukraine doesn't align with your statement here. Invest in both sweetening the deal for Greenland if the military isn't used as a stick, and don't foolishly assume Russia will align with us against China while we go after Greenland and Iran for similar and different ambitions.
Wouldn't they want to be? They're pretty close with Denmark. Their people have way more in common with them and other northern European states than China or Russia or the like. I think that could be a pretty good pathway.If Greenland passed an independence referendum how would they be associated with NATO?...
Wouldn't they want to be? They're pretty close with Denmark. Their people have way more in common with them and other northern European states than China or Russia or the like. I think that could be a pretty good pathway.
Paying isn't force, it's a transaction.
![]()
Greenlandic independence - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, its like Sudetenland ?Resources, US security ,and an enhanced ability to control an expanding NW passage...
We'll do it to own the Libtards, my good man.So we can't afford to fund cancer research, but we will pay hundreds of millions in welfare to Danish citizens for what reason then?
How will you defend Trump's desire to take over Canada? What bullshit are you going to throw at that?Resources, US security ,and an enhanced ability to control an expanding NW passage...
They will be the CHERISHED 51st state. You hear that Lib — CHERISHED. That alone should be more than enough for them.How will you defend Trump's desire to take over Canada? What bullshit are you going to throw at that?
It makes perfect sense to everyone that is a ****ing moron.greenland wants independence, so we should be looking to "control Greenland as a territory"
makes perfect sense
It does if you’re on drugs like @Riflergreenland wants independence, so we should be looking to "control Greenland as a territory"
makes perfect sense
What a coincidence-the Greenland independence movement starts just when it may benefit trump.
US has had a base there since the 1950s.
![]()
I'm maintaining the position that Trump only wants Greenland so he can name it after himself in some manner.
I'm maintaining the position that Trump only wants Greenland so he can name it after himself in some manner.
China is working its way into Greenland and we do need to monitor the situation. A hostile takeover is not the way to go about though,Are you drunk?
Especially looking at the disdain Puerto Rico is treated with as a territory.greenland wants independence, so we should be looking to "control Greenland as a territory"
makes perfect sense
Disgusting. I hope any effort fails and/or backfires.
I'd like to play this game with the entirety of the federal budget and most of what people the District of Columbia are up to.Again - what is in it for you? Because it will cost the US a helluva lot of money,
Denmark can't adequately maintain or protect Greenland, the locals want independence, and the US looks to be a natural partner,.. I think this could actually happen down the road.
We'll do it to own the Libtards, my good man.\