Probably? Please list the specific benefits they will lose.Except that to pay for those cuts, the poorest would probably lose $500 in benefits. So, no, they do not benefit.
Probably? Please list the specific benefits they will lose.Except that to pay for those cuts, the poorest would probably lose $500 in benefits. So, no, they do not benefit.
Right now,apparently, none. It’s just an increase to the deficit. One can assume, however, that the deficit-conscious GOP will not be so irresponsible as to simply cut taxes without cutting spending. And historically their favorite target is the poor.Probably? Please list the specific benefits they will lose.
“Probably” , “apparently” and “assume”. Yet you are so confident.Right now,apparently, none. It’s just an increase to the deficit. One can assume, however, that the deficit-conscious GOP will not be so irresponsible as to simply cut taxes without cutting spending. And historically their favorite target is the poor.
Everyone who pays taxes would have a little more money. Those who already have the most would benefit the most.
Yeah, post that rabble rousing drivel from far left sites. I’m sure it’ll change hearts, minds, and voting habits.It's a lie, but okay, comrade, you've earned your propaganda star this month!!
Benefits? That stuff that folks with jobs pay for you mean?Except that to pay for those cuts, the poorest would probably lose $500 in benefits. So, no, they do not benefit.
It’s just an increase to the deficit.
Nonsense. We have a bill-paying problem and a borrowing problem.We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
In this case it's always better to be the trickler not the tricklee.Trickle down has existed my entire life. I'm just worried everyone that was around when it was started will be dead before the trickle starts.
RTFMProbably? Please list the specific benefits they will lose.
You know there is a long history of the GOP doing these things, so it's not exactly a stretch to assume they will continue giving tax cuts to billionaires while cutting programs for the less fortunate.“Probably” , “apparently” and “assume”. Yet you are so confident.
They want to kill social security and medicaid. How pissed would you be if your SS payment went away even though you paid into it your whole life?Benefits? That stuff that folks with jobs pay for you mean?
America has plenty of money to do the things we want to do.
He was giving the Rs some benefit of doubt. Probably shouldn't have. When was the last time Rs believably cared about deficits, after all?“Probably” , “apparently” and “assume”. Yet you are so confident.