Will Prez Hillary Do for Women What Obama Did for Blacks?
- Thread starter What Would Jesus Do?
- Start date
Well, apparently police officers kill them at a much greater rate than any other demographic.
I'd say women have to watch their backs if Hillary wins.
Do you mean get them organized and voting in record numbers or serve as a lightning rod for bigotry? She could probably accomplish both IMO.
Using your same logic.
Obozo thinks there are 57 States.
We have Corpse Men defending the Country.
If you build a business..you didn't do that..someone else made that happen.
If you like your Dr you can keep your Dr.
Should I go on?
Obama has done nothing for the Blacks as
far as the economy goes. Hillary will do
nothing for Women and their economic issues.
Obama was the first Black President and
Hillary wants to be the first Woman Prez.
Both of them were trying to boost their ego.
far as the economy goes. Hillary will do
nothing for Women and their economic issues.
Obama was the first Black President and
Hillary wants to be the first Woman Prez.
Both of them were trying to boost their ego.
What's not to hate about Sarah Palin?
Kids of politicians though, unless they are in the public spotlight on their own accord, should be off-limits as far as I'm concerned. For example, when Bill was in office it sickened me when people made fun of Chelsea Clinton. Now, however, if she begins campaigning for her mother then I think her actions can be scrutinized by the media.
There may be some, but I doubt you'll have a lot of people claiming misogyny unless the 'bashing' is gender-based.
Most of the attacks on Palin were invited. Those touching her kids weren't, and I objected to them at the time. At some point kids may grow up and earn their own attention, but those attacks were an embarrassment. If I were OiT, I might even have to wonder if the right produced some of those attacks in a bid for a sympathy vote. But I took it as a reminder that liberals can be just as dumb as cons, if not as reliably nasty.
Libs are much, much nastier than Cons. Exhibit number one of that is the Duke rape case. Three innocent boys but they were run through the meat grinder. All with out a shred of evidence. They over 30 Professors(most on the left) took out a double truck add and refused to apologize when the truth came out. Many more but that's pretty typical of liberal hate
If you mean again, I'd have to think about it. Affirmative action definitely was justified when it was introduced, and for quite some time afterward. I think the need for it a decade or so ago may not have justified it.
Well if it's effectivy 1965 with a weakened voting rights act, it must be justified, right? After Hillary we will need to pass the ERA.
Well white guilt became quite prevalent during his tenure. Perhaps male guilt will come around as well?
Hmm, if voting rights were rolled back under Obama, wouldn't a rollback of women's rights under Hillary be the appropriate parallel?
Clearly those who care about women's rights should vote against Hillary.
OTOH, if a GOP wins, SCOTUS will be packed with clones of Alito, Scalia and Thomas. Even Roberts and Kennedy are too liberal for today's cons.
First off I would rather have Palin in any situation over that OLD smelly Hillary. Wrinkled up old bag, Saul Alinsky worshiping , egotistical POS. We need NO more Clinton's NO more Bush's. As much as the press will try to shove them down our throats.
