ADVERTISEMENT

Will Title IX apply? If not, how should IOWA Football divide roughly $16M in Revenue Sharing between the 105 Roster Players?

How do you figure? The athletic department owes the university $235.1 million.
Iowa has already stated it will be able to pay the $20.5 million per year in revenue sharing. They've been planning for it.

The Athletic Department borrowed $50 million during the pandemic —it doesn't owe the University $235 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClarindaA's
This is simply a last ditch effort by the Biden Admin to force schools to give equal payments for revenue that wasn't earned equally. It will be challenged in court because you can't have a scenario where the rules are constantly changing based on which political party is in power. I would expect that a court will quickly determine that the House settlement specifically called for REVENUE SHARING, which means you share the revenue with the players in the sport that are actually generating the revenue. This idea that everything needs to be equal is bullshit. It's supposed to be about fairness, not equal.

I found it interesting that Doc wrote that this will receive an immediate court challenge and the DoE won't win.
 
What a scholarship student athlete will be getting:

* Revenue sharing payments from the school
* NIL income
* Free tuition
* Free housing
* Free, Unlimited healthy Food
* Free Training & Weight Room access
* Free Personal Training
* Free Physical Therapy

I am sure I missed something but the value of the above is pretty incredible, especially for an out of state student.
I want them to remove the cap on years they can play at a school.
 
Should be worker's comp for any football injury.
Why? This would require the university to pay workers' compensation insurance premiums for "amateur" athletes. And if the University has to do that, how could they continue to afford the non-revenue sports? And wouldn't this open the door for all amateur athletes to sue for compensation at all levels of college athletics? I would think something like this could destroy athletics in the lower divisions like NAIA and Division III.
 
Why? This would require the university to pay workers' compensation insurance premiums for "amateur" athletes. And if the University has to do that, how could they continue to afford the non-revenue sports? And wouldn't this open the door for all amateur athletes to sue for compensation at all levels of college athletics? I would think something like this could destroy athletics in the lower divisions like NAIA and Division III.
Any company with employees has to pay work comp premiums. Boo hoo.
 
Any company with employees has to pay work comp premiums. Boo hoo.
Nice attitude. That being said, they aren't employees. And if we ever see a place where college athletes are considered employees it will be an end to a majority of college athletics. Very few could ever afford to fund teams.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT