Will Trump pardon Chauvin?
- Thread starter WDSMHAWK
- Start date
At some point they need some protests to try the military out on. I know they're itching.
My guess is since pardoning him wouldn't spring him from the state pen that he probably won't. Why invite the criticism for a symbolic pardon?
If he wasn't under state charges than yes he probably would.
If he wasn't under state charges than yes he probably would.
I
It’s symbolic. Sticking it to the libs. Good enough reason to do anything.
Chauvin is already behind bars on state murder charges for his role in Floyd's death. In that state case, he was sentenced in June 2021 to more than 22 years in prison on charges of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for his role in Floyd's death.
Robert's SC going to overrule state laws now?
It makes perfect political sense in a MAGA world to make this Pardon. Trump pardons him in a blue state. (Sentence runs concurrent, so it doesn't matter). Causes mass riots in the blue state and then orders the national guard to enter the blue state, setting up a showdown with the blue state governor. Eventually rallies the base so much in the blue state to flip it red. I mean, it's the same playbook of doubling down on racism that has successfully worked for a decade now. Play to the lowest common denominators.
Speaking of coping — it's hard to cope with the fact that Arnold Palmer had one of the biggest dicks on the planet.
Seems like the state appellate courts and U.S. Supreme Court disagree with you.
There are zero concerns he received a fair trial. He’s a bad person and he’s where he belongs.
Trump might pardon him but he still has to serve his state sentence.
We are all better off he’s off the street.
Supreme Court rejects appeal of former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd
The Supreme Court has rejected former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin’s appeal of his conviction for second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd.
apnews.com
The Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Supreme Court rejects appeal of former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd
The Supreme Court has rejected former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin’s appeal of his conviction for second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd.
apnews.com
That took five seconds to find.
They don’t take up cases where they don’t see a point to hearing the appeal.
Supreme Court rejects appeal of former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd
The Supreme Court has rejected former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin’s appeal of his conviction for second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd.apnews.com
That took five seconds to find.
....But....but....that didn't show up ANYWHERE on TruthSocial, yo!!!!
Turns out "I was white and it was just another black man" isn't actual grounds for appeal, anymore!!!
no shit captain - knew that.They never heard the arguments of the appeal.Supreme Court rejects appeal of former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd
The Supreme Court has rejected former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin’s appeal of his conviction for second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd.apnews.com
That took five seconds to find.
They DID hear the arguments of the appeal.
They REJECTED them as not having any merit justifying a formal appeal.
"But I'm white" didn't resonate with the liberal justices and Clarence Thomas (this time)...
Please list off the concerns you had with his trial, and the three co-defendants.
Please list off the concerns you have from his trial, and those of his co-defendants.
TIA
Edit: Oh, you did, and it was a massive fail.
This. He is fixated with imposing martial law, the insurrection act, and using the military against civilians. So many of our sober minded legal experts have minimized the moves of Trump, but he has removed the guardrails, and the people who would say no to the 82nd Airborne killing civilians (Ni**ers), in the streets of US citizens.
What are your concerns with the trial, and those of his three co-defendants?
Be specific. DogBoy tried and failed. Please give me a good laugh by failing, too.
To prevent Trump's lackeys from using the power of the DOJ from going after them.
Which is precisely what they were going to do.
If they want to go after them, they have two avenues. One, treason isn't pardonable. Two, they can have charges brought in a MAGA-friendly state.
So, why haven't they brought "treason" charges, then?
Perhaps, because Rudy Giuliani "holding up a piece of paper" with a Russian stooge in the photo with him isn't actually admissible evidence, perchance?
Uh, no. They cannot.
Just like "Democrats" cannot go and charge 1/6 criminals that have been pardoned in "Non-MAGA Friendly states".
You seem a bit clueless on how the laws in this country work.
They wouldn't last 10 minutes this time around, the dogs and firehoses are ready.
I didn't say they should be charged. I am not aware of any evidence to support it.
Considering they were literally 1 vote from overturning Article 1 of the Constitution, it's a decent guess....
NORTHERN DOESN'T ANSWER QUESTIONS, MUTHA F$CKA. HE ASKS THEM.
Last edited:
