I saw a headline that said more than 60% Iowa’s electricity is wind turbine generated. Is that anywhere near accurate? How does your governor let ANY electricity be generated by wind turbines with Trump’s assertion it causes cancer?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw a headline that said more than 60% Iowa’s electricity is wind turbine generated. Is that anywhere near accurate? How does your governor let ANY electricity be generated by wind turbines with Trump’s assertion it causes cancer?
I don’t know what kind of math you’re doing, but I do want to hear more about it.Fvck cancer, those turbines kill flocks of retarded geese so it all evens out.
I saw a headline that said more than 60% Iowa’s electricity is wind turbine generated. Is that anywhere near accurate? How does your governor let ANY electricity be generated by wind turbines with Trump’s assertion it causes cancer?
Get get anything on this board without a liberal hijacking.And here I thought this thread would be about something positive, which wind generated energy is in Iowa. Naa. Let’s politic.
Pretty amazing. I had no idea they had that much.Wind power was 62% of Iowa’s total power generation in 2022. There are windy days that 100% is from wind.
![]()
Wind power in Iowa - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Will be interesting to see if we rebuild.
The ROI on them isn't great and I have to believe today changed the numbers.
How many of them got destroyed by tornadoes yesterday? Iowa has over 6000 turbines currently, so I'm guessing the numbers didn't change that much.
I saw a headline that said more than 60% Iowa’s electricity is wind turbine generated. Is that anywhere near accurate? How does your governor let ANY electricity be generated by wind turbines with Trump’s assertion it causes cancer?
Will be interesting to see if we rebuild.
The ROI on them isn't great and I have to believe today changed the numbers.
trump's full of shit. We get our cancer from agriculture run off. And kim is proud of it.I saw a headline that said more than 60% Iowa’s electricity is wind turbine generated. Is that anywhere near accurate? How does your governor let ANY electricity be generated by wind turbines with Trump’s assertion it causes cancer?
Agreed. The only reason those things exist is they are subsidized out the yin yang.The secret to actually building all of them is the tax credits given. For the first 10 years you got a tax credit when they were built so they were beneficial even when not running. Then they had something (can’t remember the term for it) basically they put on larger blades and/or a larger motor and the 10 year tax credit started all over again.
Agreed. The only reason those things exist is they are subsidized out the yin yang.
They produce 60% of our energy, that doesn't mean they are the cheapest or best way to get the energy. ( evidenced by thr multitude of them laying on the ground around tornado alley today
I don't mind them, sometimes they are nice, sometimes the lights are annoying. The signature hole at my local.club has one in the background and it makes it feel very "Iowa" ish.I’m actually fine with the wind production, I shake my head at having solar in Iowa. You have extremely rich farm land and waste it by putting up solar. Much better places and less fertile ground you could build solar farms. Plus they aren’t great when it comes to efficiency.
InterestingWind power was 62% of Iowa’s total power generation in 2022. There are windy days that 100% is from wind.
![]()
Wind power in Iowa - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's a little of both... this is HORT, after all. Did you feel attacked?And here I thought this thread would be about something positive, which wind generated energy is in Iowa. Naa. Let’s politic.
I don't mind them, sometimes they are nice, sometimes the lights are annoying. The signature hole at my local.club has one in the background and it makes it feel very "Iowa" ish.
What I do know is, if those things had to run like a real business ans actually be profitable, they wouldn't exist.
Mid America gets giant subsidies from the feds. Fwiw Branstead started it.MidAmerican owns over 2,000 of them (that’s from a couple years ago So that number has increased) they are making money. I will be interested to see what they do when the tax credit ends.
Also, just remembered the word for when they change out blades and motors and the 10 year credit starts over. It’s called “repower”
#wellfairqueensAnyone who has driven across the state can certainly see why wind is the predominant energy supplier. Those windmills are everywhere. I do some business with Midamerican and the contacts that I talk to said that wind is all they are looking at for expansion. Between not needing as much manpower and the lesser regulation on wind it’s the greatest return of investment for them.
Agreed. The only reason those things exist is they are subsidized out the yin yang.
They produce 60% of our energy, that doesn't mean they are the cheapest or best way to get the energy. ( evidenced by thr multitude of them laying on the ground around tornado alley today
Tornadoes don't knock over coal mines, is that cost accounted foe in your projections?
Wind power was 62% of Iowa’s total power generation in 2022. There are windy days that 100% is from wind.
![]()
Wind power in Iowa - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It has to do with wind direction and how fast they can spin the blades.When I drive to the Quad Cities from Minnesota, more often than not I see that a good number of the wind turbines aren't spinning at all. Sometimes it is 20-30% of them, other times it is way north of 50% of them are stopped. I always wonder why that would be. Seems like a lot more electricity could be generated and it could be closer to 100% most of the time.
It has to do with wind direction and how fast they can spin the blades.
No. I don't think so, which is why they are all positioned the way they are. If those things had motors in them to turn the head of what I will ignorantly call the "fan" that would take a giant motor and likely kill all productivity.They can't be rotated to face the wind? I also thought that they had braking systems to limit the blade rotation speed when necessary.
Tornadoes don't knock over coal mines, is that cost accounted foe in your projections?
I’m actually fine with the wind production, I shake my head at having solar in Iowa. You have extremely rich farm land and waste it by putting up solar. Much better places and less fertile ground you could build solar farms. Plus they aren’t great when it comes to efficiency.
Handy word of advice - if WDT posits something, assume the opposite is true. You will be correct 99% of the time,How many of them got destroyed by tornadoes yesterday? Iowa has over 6000 turbines currently, so I'm guessing the numbers didn't change that much.
No. I don't think so, which is why they are all positioned the way they are. If those things had motors in them to turn the head of what I will ignorantly call the "fan" that would take a giant motor and likely kill all productivity.
#2. I don't know that part.
And the next day they will go right back to.work and produce.more energy. Meanwhile they are finding wind turbines in backyards in Earlham.I didn't realize coal mines and coal power plants were immune from tornadoes. Oh, wait...
![]()
Tornado rips through massive Wyoming coal mining site, injures 8 people
The tornado struck during a shift change and flipped buses waiting to transport workers.www.wsaz.com
A wind farm is operated in conjunction with other power plants. At any given time the grid needs a certain amount of energy in certain places. They have algorithms based on available power and power need to 'turn on' available power. A wind farm as a unit has different capacity factors always at play. Generator nameplate capacity, power available in the wind at a given time, optimal power output per generator etc.When I drive to the Quad Cities from Minnesota, more often than not I see that a good number of the wind turbines aren't spinning at all. Sometimes it is 20-30% of them, other times it is way north of 50% of them are stopped. I always wonder why that would be. Seems like a lot more electricity could be generated and it could be closer to 100% most of the time.