Wisconsin high court suspends Milwaukee judge accused of helping man evade immigration authorities
- Thread starter Sullivan
- Start date
You do realize an administrative warrant does not cover any actions taken in a private area. Meaning if they show up to private property, you do not have to cooperate . . . period, end of story and no charges can be filed. So extrapolating that to the courtroom and her judicial duties, that order means squat, in the courtroom. The head judge even said, only hallways or front entryway is covered. So in this case, you would need to show intent. You would need to show that your warrant covered actions in the courtroom (it doesn't) - and that actions taken in a considered private institution are obstruction. According to the law, that is a mighty large hurdle to jump, and although the claim is flashy, it will most likely be dismissed.
You do realize the courthouse is now effectively having all immigration cases on zoom because the individuals do not feel "safe" coming to court. There is absolutely nothing covered in the administrative warrant covering that. That an individual shows up, even if that individual was notified not to show up, they can't do squat with it. Judicial warrant, that is a completely different situation.
Exactly, that warrant didn't have anything to do with her. If it did they would have arrested the client in the courtroom. You are really struggling with the scope of an administrative warrant. Literally all it is, is an office memo to say you are authorized to arrest this guy. That is literally it.
Let the courts play out. Your guy thinks MS13 is literally tattooed on Garcia's knuckles and that there will be no effects on the economy from the tariffs. Your guy seems to be losing court cases left and right. So yes I do think they likely lose this case, either on technicality or due to actual legal reasons.Bunsen82...
Just because I disagree with your position doesn't make it wrong. You just disagree with my position. Thats life, get over yourself.
So...you're saying that in a FEDERAL COURTHOUSE (property of the government) that a bench warrant doesn't have to be honored by a federal employee?
Yeah, maybe you're right. I guess if there's any problem with the warrant, that could be the saving grace for the person who committed a crime by obstructing the arrest.
And so for some, their politics tell them that's what they want to happen, in this particular instance...
Seems lacking in consistency and integrity. But OK.
In other words, change a few things, (make the arrestee a J6er, make the judge an activist conservative judge) and the lefty argument is completely different.
Conservatives do this same thing too, I know. Personally I'm trying to not be a person who does that.
"The warrant didn't have anything to do with her."
That would be the case for anyone who obstructed any arrest.
And it would still be a crime.
Look do I think what she did was wrong. Yes. Did it violate the law. Most likely no. Do I think she came from the right place. Yes. Do I think the agents were overly aggressive? Yes. Do I think Trump and his cabinet put this in motion in January, to cause an issue. Yes. Do I think they don't care what happens in this case, that this is meant to intimidate the judiciary. Hell yes. Do I think there are violations of Due Process. Trump admitted as much in the transcript of his interview for his first 100 days. Saying we will get them out of here, I don't care what the law is, my lawyers dictate what the law is. That is effectively what he stated. Do I think she will be convicted, No.
Judicial warrant Randall . . . plus question of private area vs public. Come on padawan, you have a lot to learn.
Her view is that warrant didn't cover the courthouse or her courtroom. Personally I don't think she is wrong. But others will ultimately decide that.
I agree, but let's apply this to something different. Let's say someone is in the courtroom for a simple drug case. The DEA shows up to question them for a homicide (drug related) case and he's the prime suspect. If the judge helps escort the perp out, wouldn't you be upset? She's going to lose this case.
She decided to help that guy evade arrest. You decided to keep evading that fact.
Did she, you know what was going through her mind. I will never claim to know what is going through a womans mind.
Playing dumb is saying you don't know what was going through her mind, given her history, and given the situation.
Being dumb is not knowing what was going through her mind, given her history, and given the situation.
thats not how the courts work. So were those MS13 tattoos real on the knuckles Seminole?
Never stopped President Trump or his lawyers.So...you're saying that in a FEDERAL COURTHOUSE (property of the government) that a bench warrant doesn't have to be honored by a federal employee?
They will never get it done. There is no crime here. Just another Republican ghost chase.
Is this a re-run of the Bill Clinton chase days? 🤡
Don't throw a Trump BS out there and change the subject. The dispute going is about whether or not a federal judge has the right or not to honor a bench warrant on federal property.
I have no idea where you pulled Trump and his lawyers out of, guessing your a**. But no one ever escorted Trump out the back door to avoid any of his warrants. In fact he went in the front door in front of cameras.
There are a million ways to not tell “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”…Trump used them all in defending his actions as President several times during his first run……particularly for his involvement in the events following his 2020 election loss and his role in the events leading up to and including 1/6/21….
Again… this case may look one way to you, yet without PROOF, you have nothing….and buddy boy, you have no proof here. The “Trump defense model” comes back and bites you in the ass.
