Chris Quomo says hes vaccine injured
- Thread starter KFsdisciple
- Start date
You're a dumber bitch for repeating it. When you were told multiple times that Cuomo had Covid sequelae from Covid.
Dipshit.
You don’t know that, but neither do I. It’s possible he does have side effects, when you go off like you do though, no one thinks you are comprehending what is being posted or said. Like you’re triggered.
I used to like Cuomo but he’s turned out to be a bit of a tool
Holy ****. I didn’t…..say……. Shit about…..Cuomo……you ****ing….. moron. I was talking about the person he interviewed. Would it be elderly abuse if I knocked the **** out of you? Show me where I said Cuomo had vaccine symptoms
There is no such thing as long Covid, say health officials
Doctors in Queensland say the condition is no different to any post-viral syndrome
www.telegraph.co.uk
NEITHER DOES HE/SHE.
And there are NO understood risks of Long Covid from the vaccines - if there WERE, we'd have seen them in spades as everyone got vaccinated.
But that has not happened. and what we DO see is Long Covid risks multiplying WITH COVID INFECTIONS.
You kept yapping at my comments about Cuomo, dipshit.
Stay in your lane. Your lane ain't understanding science, Cletus.
There is no such thing as long Covid, say health officials
Doctors in Queensland say the condition is no different to any post-viral syndrome
Meanwhile, dozens of publications belie whatever propaganda the UK Telegraph wants to push out here.
I certainly know far more about this topic than you do.
Here's a nugget for you:
Now, you learned something NEW today about Covid!!!!
22 posts in this thread alone from our resident vaccine expert
🤣 🤣 🤣I certainly know far more about this topic than you do.
Here's a nugget for you:
Now, you learned something NEW today about Covid!!!
The (unsourced) chart above brought to you by the marketing firm of ModeRNA, ModeRNA & ModeRNA.
So much for data, eh Cleee’Tuss?
Long COVID Awareness Day: Amplifying the Patient Voice
I was much sicker after both of my vaccine shots than I was when I later got covid. With all of our field mechanics and office staff(. Around 400) we didn’t have anyone go to the hospital because of Covid but we did have 3 that were hospitalized after their 1st vaccine shot
You’re right, my apologies. I let the frustration over someone else’s lack of comprehension bother me way too much.
Damn, Pfizer! Looks like you messed up. Again.
Why do people still trust you after all these crimes? Maybe next time hire a scientist to run your company instead of a horse doc… 🤷♂️
Why do people still trust you after all these crimes? Maybe next time hire a scientist to run your company instead of a horse doc… 🤷♂️
This would make a good T shirt for you...
Why would I need you to source it for me when I did that for you 10 hrs ago?
Oh, btw, it wasn’t a study. It was a survey.
Which, it seems, in your sad little world is an adequate substitute for actual science.
🤡
No.... there's no STEM stuff going on at any of our tech companies.
Not pharma, aerospace, medical device, microchips, etc etc etc.
It's all based on "magic".
No. They’re a propaganda-fueled, profit based criminal consortium.
When you use everybody as your guinea pigs, especially those who would most likely never have been affected by COVID in the first place, of course you're going to introduce bad side effects - because you just don't effing know
WTF? Covid is endemic now, Cletus.
Significant percentages of people now suffer long-term sequelae from exposure to it.
The vaccines have demonstrated clearly that they lower those risks.
Keep telling your GOP buddies to skip updated vaccine doses - it will continue 'offing' your voters until you're a distinct minority here.
P
A limitation of the present study is that it relies on self-reported information about infections and experiences since the beginning of the pandemic, which some people may not be able to remember accurately, especially as time goes on. It is also subject to recall bias, where a person’s current state may influence their recollection of the past. Further, with regards to past infections, respondents were asked to include both confirmed and suspectedCOVID-19 infections; it is possible that a person reported one or more suspected COVID-19 infections that were due to a different virus. Data from CCAHS-2, which tested for the presence of COVID-19 antibodies, showed that some people who reported a suspected infection in 2022 did not have detectable antibodies due to an infection. By contrast, there were also people in CCAHS-2 who tested positive for antibodies from a past infection but did not report a past infection (were unaware). In addition, distinguishing between different infections and long-term symptoms may have been difficult. Some reported new infections could have been related to a persistent past infection or the development of long-term symptoms. Conversely, it is possible that some people were experiencing symptoms from a new infection, rather than long-term symptoms from a past infection. Finally, although there was a large sample that responded to the CCAHS-FQ, it was only about one-third of those who had responded to the CCAHS-2, being limited, in part, by the availability of valid email addresses for follow-up. While the survey weights were adjusted to account for non-response and incomplete coverage, it is possible that those who had more infections or had more symptoms, etc. were more likely to respond to the CCAHS-FQ.
Sounds like psychosomatic disorder(s).
About as relevant as surveying registered republicans in the reddest county in Florida if they think Trump was a good president.
It was a Canadian survey, eh. I’m the one who posted it, eh. And as we all know, surveys are no substitute for peer-reviewed, RCT’s, eh.
A limitation of the present study is that it relies on self-reported information about infections and experiences since the beginning of the pandemic, which some people may not be able to remember accurately, especially as time goes on. It is also subject to recall bias, where a person’s current state may influence their recollection of the past. Further, with regards to past infections, respondents were asked to include both confirmed and suspectedCOVID-19 infections; it is possible that a person reported one or more suspected COVID-19 infections that were due to a different virus. Data from CCAHS-2, which tested for the presence of COVID-19 antibodies, showed that some people who reported a suspected infection in 2022 did not have detectable antibodies due to an infection. By contrast, there were also people in CCAHS-2 who tested positive for antibodies from a past infection but did not report a past infection (were unaware). In addition, distinguishing between different infections and long-term symptoms may have been difficult. Some reported new infections could have been related to a persistent past infection or the development of long-term symptoms. Conversely, it is possible that some people were experiencing symptoms from a new infection, rather than long-term symptoms from a past infection. Finally, although there was a large sample that responded to the CCAHS-FQ, it was only about one-third of those who had responded to the CCAHS-2, being limited, in part, by the availability of valid email addresses for follow-up. While the survey weights were adjusted to account for non-response and incomplete coverage, it is possible that those who had more infections or had more symptoms, etc. were more likely to respond to the CCAHS-FQ.
Sounds like psychosomatic disorder(s).
About as relevant as surveying registered republicans in the reddest county in Florida if they think Trump was a good president.
It's not reading comprehension, it's manic behavior anytime the word vaccine is mentioned or questioned. He has the inability to think rationally on pretty much any topic though so not really anything new.
It is sooo telling though how the pfizer approved narrative for anyone claiming vax injuries is, "that was from covid, not the vax"... As if they have any idea or even remotely gaf.
I'm the one who posted the conclusions from it. You didn't appear to understand any of it, Cletus.
