Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
my gawd, they blew the video up to show the Puke's fingers touching the ballOriginally posted by ISPHawk:
Changed the whole game. How did they miss that??
Posted from Rivals Mobile
can you give the details on this? i forget; did Okafer then score (when he should not have)Originally posted by Arizona_Hawks:
Plus the kid was out of bounds on the other end.
Badger fans have to be sick; this was their year; its crazy to think that only freshman scored for Duke in the 2nd halfOriginally posted by BansheeX:
Yeah, there were about 3 calls that I thought were bad in the last 5 minutes:
-Winslow charges a guy backing up and hands straight up, called a blocking foul.
-Winslow steps out of bounds, not seen.
-Winslow fingertips the ball out of bounds, not seen even with slow-mo replay.
So a close game with double digit lead changes can't come down to one call? Sure...Originally posted by markfromj:
Yes, an entire game comes down to one call....give me a break!
Correct. Every call in that game added to the result. No one call determined the outcome.Originally posted by fecal particulate:
So a close game with double digit lead changes can't come down to one call? Sure...Originally posted by markfromj:
Yes, an entire game comes down to one call....give me a break!
i hate both duke and Wisky; i am just pointing out that the refs went to review that call and it was clear the ball was off PUKE; the refs got the call WRONG, which happens; HOWEVER, they had the chance to use video replay, which showed the ball should have been awarded to WI; the refs told Jim Nance that there was not enough there to reverse the call.....Really????Originally posted by QChawks:
I see the Duke conspiracy folks are up late tonight.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
When a game can be decided by the slimmest of margins of course one call can determine a game. It's only more magnified in the final minutes.Originally posted by markfromj:
Correct. Every call in that game added to the result. No one call determined the outcome.Originally posted by fecal particulate:
So a close game with double digit lead changes can't come down to one call? Sure...Originally posted by markfromj:
Yes, an entire game comes down to one call....give me a break!
Okay, but which one call then? Why the one late in the game? Why not the one with 11 minutes to go in the first half? Were it not for that call, the one at the end of the game would not appear to have made all the difference.Originally posted by Emerald Street:
This is the most naive statement that I ever hear people say.
If the entire game can be won on a last second shot, then yes an entire game can come down to one call.
Exactly. But it is no more important than a hundred other calls.Originally posted by fecal particulate:
When a game can be decided by the slimmest of margins of course one call can determine a game. It's only more magnified in the final minutes.Originally posted by markfromj:
Correct. Every call in that game added to the result. No one call determined the outcome.Originally posted by fecal particulate:
So a close game with double digit lead changes can't come down to one call? Sure...Originally posted by markfromj:
Yes, an entire game comes down to one call....give me a break!
I though the first one was a charge as well.Originally posted by BansheeX:
Yeah, there were about 3 calls that I thought were bad in the last 5 minutes:
-Winslow charges a guy backing up and hands straight up, called a blocking foul.
-Winslow steps out of bounds, not seen.
-Winslow fingertips the ball out of bounds, not seen even with slow-mo replay.