It's amazing that he thinks the offense "works." The offense that is directly responsible for losing 2, and possibly 3 games. The offense that was bailed out of another loss by the defense.
Nice deflection. Please name me some people minus yourself and the Ferentz family. I’ll hang up and listen. Btw plenty of former players and coaches who think our offense and OC are awful.
So you think Petras is a good quarterback?
Difference between being positive and rational. You make multiple claims about how BF is a great OC and argue against those who say different. I along with countless people disagree. Stats back it up and analyst, journalist and people who’ve played have said Iowa needs to move on from him. Again please cite 1 example of someone, besides KF, who thinks bf is doing a job and as you claimed a “great” OC.
that doesn't matter... the success the Hawkeyes have enjoyed the last several years says it all
So all those Oklahomas teams under Riley that won 50-45 then with your logic their DC was doing a good job? Or if you have a business and one sector is hemorrhaging $ but company is making a big profit then you’d consider the one in a negative a success? Or what about this year’s avg 7-5 record. Team success doesn’t translate automatically to mean the offense or our OC has been good.
He would call a 1-11 season a success.
They're fine if you just want to hear some dudes talk and sometimes make a good point. They aren't great but they fill a void which is there aren't any other hawkeye podcasters.
I think Chad Leistekow and Kennington Smith do the best podcast in the Hawkverse. (AINEC)
Love those guys they’re definitely serious and know their sheet
Insightful.
Based on one fan’s view. Many disagree, myself included.
I just hate how Kluver and Drake never can point a finger at Kirk. I get that they want to stay in good graces with a coach they liked, but they never are critical and often lash out at people who do criticize them. The fallback is “you never played at Iowa so you have no clue” excuse.
Lol someone is triggered, if you're going from thread to thread and being serious about this.............
Nothing I am saying isn’t true. If it gets your panties in a bunch that’s a you problem.
So they liked their coach, had experiences with the coach that people who didn't play there wouldn't understand and they don't go out of their way to criticize said coach.
I’ve never gotten that feeling from the pod. They laugh about “Cheeto fingers” from time to time, but that’s a very accurate description of many message board/Twitter tough guys (many of whom grace this board and often make it borderline unreadable) who have no fricking clue what they’re talking about.
Fair take. I think their sweet spot is to focus on their behind-the-scenes perspective based on their playing days and analysis of the action as former players during the season, and interviews of former players and coaches plus any other connections in the off-season.
Actually, it's your opinion that they suck and since that clearly has your panties in a bunch, you definitely have a "you" problem. THAT is what a true statement looks like.
All that typing and you still crapped your pants.Actually, it's your opinion that they suck and since that clearly has your panties in a bunch, you definitely have a "you" problem. THAT is what a true statement looks like.
I don't have any problem with you giving your opinion or that you are triggered by their podcast/them as podcasters.
I just like pointing it out.....whether that's for others to under, or for your own self-realization.
Good luck staying triggered.
P.S. I have never listened to their podcast, and I don't even remember the names of the players doing it, nor will I look it up. I am being serious about that. And I still know enough not to take your word for it.
Hope that helps!
Kluver doesn’t even like football. He’s admitted it multiple times and doesn’t even watch it.
Since you like talking about pants and pooping, does listening to these guys talk on their podcast make you crap your pants?
