ADVERTISEMENT

  • Poll
Who should be Iowa's regular season finale (and/or Black Friday game)?

Who should Iowa play in the final week of the regular season?

  • Nebraska

    Votes: 74 50.0%
  • Minnesota

    Votes: 37 25.0%
  • Wisconsin

    Votes: 16 10.8%
  • Iowa State

    Votes: 13 8.8%
  • Screw tradition, just play whoever, because F*** Wisconsin, that's why!

    Votes: 8 5.4%

Wanted to pose this question just to kind of gauge this section of the fanbase on their thoughts about our regular season finale matchup.

Do you guys like this recent "tradition" of playing Nebraska on Black Friday?
Or would you rather go back to us playing Wisconsin or Minnesota to close the season?

Or would you like to see us go the route of say the SEC and ACC and face our biggest OOC rival to end the season, and battle the Cyclones, like we ended up having to do in the 2001 season?

Also, would you like Iowa to continue to play on Black Friday annually? Go back to the Saturday after? Or would you like them to mix it up?
  • Love
Reactions: JerseyCityHawki

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst: Here’s $1 trillion in federal spending cuts

Idiotic:



Iowa Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst believes there's $1 trillion in government spending ripe for the cutting, the senator said this week in a letter to Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.
Tech billionaire Musk and former GOP presidential candidate Ramaswamy are heading the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, an advisory body to President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration.
Ernst has embraced the department’s goal of cutting $2 trillion in government spending.

Late last week, Ernst formed a DOGE caucus of Senate Republicans to involve Congress in discussions of spending cuts with Musk and Ramaswamy.





U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst delivers remarks during Ashley Hinson’s BBQ Bash at Hawkeye Downs in Cedar Rapids on Saturday, Aug. 3, 2024.
SAVANNAH BLAKE, The Gazette
Federal spending is determined by Congress and then approved by the president.

Ernst earlier this week sent a letter to Musk and Ramaswamy in which she detailed what she believes are options for up to $1 trillion in federal spending cuts.



“Washington has been gobbling up tax dollars and asking for seconds and thirds for far too long,” Ernst said this week in a Thanksgiving-themed statement. “The DOGE team has our knives out, and we are ready to trim the fat on the overstuffed budget and billion-dollar gravy trains to nowhere. It is time to make the federal government go cold turkey on waste.”

Ernst’s targets for spending cuts, as identified in her letter, include:

  • Selling unused government buildings and consolidating others, especially with many government employees now working from home.
  • Firing IRS agents who owe back taxes.
  • Defunding the federal electric vehicle infrastructure program.
  • Recouping fraudulent spending of federal pandemic relief funds.
  • Defunding federal assistance to California public transportation projects.
  • Changing the composition of pennies and nickels.
  • Stopping “out-of-this-world” bonuses to government employees and contractors.
  • Cutting unemployment payments for millionaires.
  • Consolidating federal agencies’ cloud computing licenses.
  • Addressing “bloated bureaucracy and inefficiency” in the Department of Defense.
  • Stopping $1 billion in monthly erroneous SNAP payments, including to ineligible recipients and individuals receiving benefits from multiple states.
  • Implementing basic management systems like establishing goals and scopes for government projects.


In her letter to Musk and Ramaswamy, Ernst evoked the “Make ’em squeal” proclamation from her first U.S. Senate campaign in 2014 and said that her fight to cut government waste has been lonely because, “Democrats and Republicans always come together in agreement over one issue: living high off the hog.”

“When faced with proposals to trim the fat from Washington’s budget, members of Congress from both parties act like Goldilocks. It’s too little or too big, always too hard, and never just right,” Ernst said in the letter.

IOWA vs ARMY grades

CRUZ UR vs 22 Thought cruz wrestled tuff, he just is not there yet 70

133 AYALA #6 vs 23 Like the quick attack to 1st TD!! Crazy scramble to army cradle refs made the right call. Thought stall call against us was BS Quick escape to start 2nd, was that crazy scramble that they looked at for locked hands or something but they were outa bounds!!!Good work in third to counter kids shot and get a TD stayed on gas to finish match !! 98

141 Schriever UR vs 29 Impressive 1st with good work on 1st TD, could not ride kid , then gave up a TD but kept working and got an escape to keep match even. went back to shot that scored for him but kid cut corner, escape early in third and we have us a match!!! Shot across body (bad shot) and gave up a TD with about 40 seconds left, got out again to give himself a chance but could not score. good match 75

149 PARCO #4 vs 26 CRAZY 1st TD maybe even CRAZIER 2nd TD POWER on display!!! Thought Parco was gonna pin him, then kid pops out, match was nutz!!! Did not get why he went to the mat edge when he lifted him into the air in the 3rd??? WAS almost like FS but kept working and got TD, kid is a MONSTER!!!! Wins belt gets major 99

157 Kael Voinovich ur vs ur Nice shrug or slide by for 1st TD, I like him wrestling aggressive, good action with both kids getting after it, announcers did not know the new rule was kinda funny, gets a nice reverse with leg coming in--- then disaster struck!!! NO grade!

165 Caliendo #2 vs 13 lot of hand fighting in 1st felt we pushed the pace mostly, Army down to start 2nd and escape in 15 seconds, finally got thru kids D with a Super Duck type shot!!!Kid cuts him in 3rd then Mikey gets on the GAS!!! TD, tuff ride to bring it over a minute and wear kid down, cut him, shot off counter to secure major 99

174 KENNEDY ur vs 31 Was shooting and getting stuck/stalemates but just kept coming!!! pushed pace gets 1st TD rides a bit then cuts him and another TD and tuff ride out, kept getting stronger as match went on, looks better and better! Cant see brands beating him right now but I guess we will see how it plays out 90

184 ARNOLD #8 vs ur the 1st scramble might have shown where his body type is at a disadvantage as the kid seemed to use his greater height/length to his advantage, also 2nd scramble where we could not score. Back to work in 2nd with a nice pop double, then another TD with short time. west point chooses top, BRANDS with good challenge on cut back to get us a point. Arnold was sloppy but kept his cool AWESOME snap to seal the win at end give him the 8-3!!!

197 BUCHANAN #2 vs UR BLAST double, MAT RETURNS, SUPER DUCK this dude is SCARY!!!!

Heavy Fleshman ur vs 27 zeros in 1st, riden out in 2nd, gives up escape in third and thats all folks!!! 65

Have to tip my hat to ARMY!!! just to go and serve is something, but to Wrestle too!!!!! I had many friends/teammates who played LAX their and always thought about how they managed? Forget how wrestlers do it with training and Army training, and school !?!??! and they wrestled well!!!

Announcers said Tom got his 300th win against Princeton so CONGRATS!!!

Trump’s F.B.I. Pick Has an Enemies List. Biden Should Pardon Everyone on It.

There are few good things to be said about Donald Trump’s plan to fire the F.B.I. director, Chris Wray, and install in his place Kash Patel, a thuggish lackey who has spent years fantasizing about taking revenge on Trump’s enemies. But there is one: Patel has helpfully provided us with a list of people President Biden should pardon before he leaves office.
Patel’s 2023 book, “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy,” purports to show how government employees who defied Trump constitute a shadowy cabal that is “the most dangerous threat to our democracy.” The “deep state,” in Patel’s telling, is “as treacherous and evil as the villains portrayed in books and movies.” Virtually every investigation of Trump and his allies, Patel suggests, is part of a monstrous plot against “the people’s president.” The book strongly implies that Jan. 6, “the insurrection that never was,” was encouraged by “deep state” agitators and then used as a pretext to persecute patriotic Trump supporters. In a blurb on the book jacket, Trump wrote, “We will use this blueprint to help us take back the White House and remove these gangsters from all of government!”
Who are these gangsters? Patel lists 60 of them in a useful alphabetized appendix. It is not, as he acknowledges, exhaustive, since he limits himself to the executive branch, leaving out “other corrupt actors of the first order” like Senator-elect Adam Schiff, the former Republican House speaker Paul Ryan and “the entire fake news mafia press corps.” His catalog of the “deep state” includes some of Patel’s bureaucratic foes from when he served in Trump’s first administration, like Bill Barr, who as attorney general said that Trump could make Patel the deputy F.B.I. director only “over my dead body,” and Wray, the man Patel would replace.
Patel also lists both the current secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, and Trump’s secretary of defense Mark Esper. Cassidy Hutchinson, the brave young former aide to Mark Meadows who testified before the Jan. 6 committee, is on the list, as is Alyssa Farah Griffin, a former Trump staff member who often criticizes her old boss on “The View.” Naturally, Biden, Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton are on it as well.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Except for himself, Biden should pardon them all, along with pretty much everyone else Patel has singled out by name and those who worked on the Jan. 6 committee. On Wednesday, Jonathan Martin reported in Politico that there’s a “vigorous internal debate” among Biden aides about issuing pre-emptive pardons to officials likely to be unjustly targeted by Trump. A drawback of such pardons, Martin wrote, is that they “could suggest impropriety, only fueling Trump’s criticisms.” After all, Biden may struggle to explain why he’s pardoning people who have done nothing wrong.
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
Patel’s appendix, however, makes the case for blanket pardons easier to convey. The breadth of it demonstrates his McCarthyite impulses better than his critics ever could.
Though Biden is not much of a communicator, he could give a speech laying out the well-founded fears that Patel may try to harass the people on his list with spurious investigations. In addition to justifying sweeping pardons, such a speech could prompt a useful nationwide discussion about what it would mean to put a man like Patel in charge of the nation’s premier law enforcement agency.
We are entering a period when the ideal of Justice Department independence will almost certainly be swept away. Political persecution — the kind Trump and his allies claim, falsely, to have been subjected to — will become routine. Biden tried to defend the basic integrity of our imperfect institutions against Trumpist aggression, and he failed. All he can do now is help the American people understand what’s coming and try to protect the ones with MAGA targets on their backs.
Those who view the federal government as a nest of criminal conspirators would, of course, interpret a raft of pardons as confirmation of their worldview. But the fear that Biden’s aggressive use of the pardon power might embolden Trump seems naïve, since all signs suggest that he will be unrestrained, no matter what Democrats do. The only reason for Trump to choose a person like Patel to lead the F.B.I. is to bend it to his will. Democrats can’t arrest that process through fealty to norms that are about to be obliterated. Yes, pardons will give Republicans a cable news talking point. The question is whether denying them that talking point is worth letting Patel ruin people’s lives on Trump’s behalf.



The pardons I’m proposing can’t cover everyone who is vulnerable to Trump’s vengeance. Elsewhere, I’ve argued that Biden should pardon all those involved in mailing abortion pills to states where abortion is banned, since the Trump administration could revive the long-dormant Comstock Act to investigate them. In doing this, Biden would be following a precedent set by Jimmy Carter when he pardoned most of those who dodged the draft during the Vietnam War. But you can’t pardon an anonymous mass of people for breaking unspecified laws; the pardon power wasn’t intended for those who’ve committed no conceivable crimes. If Trump and his cronies can’t use the justice system against those they hate most, they may use other tools, like the I.R.S., or find other scapegoats.
There’s no version of a Trump restoration that doesn’t result in both human and institutional destruction. Biden still has a duty to save who he can.

Biden can hold Trump accountable — with a pardon

For those who are not members of the MAGA crowd, it might sound ludicrous to propose that President Joe Biden extend a blanket pardon to Donald Trump, including for his actions on Jan. 6, 2021. It would excuse a man who has taken no responsibility for his role in the insurrection. But he did play a role, and that’s the reason to do it.


Make sense of the latest news and debates with our daily newsletter

There’s a battle in the United States for “historical memory.” Trump, his party and his supporters are on the side of revisionist history. To them, the rioters are “patriots.” The criminals who stalked the halls of Congress hunting for lawmakers are “hostages.”

The mob that stormed the Capitol, at Trump’s direction, was, in fact, engaged in a blatant attempt to nullify the results of the 2020 election and to harm members of Congress and the vice president. This was an attack on American democracy, incited by a leader with authoritarian tendencies — and recorded on video.

There’s no evidence that this effort to rewrite history will wane. In fact, Trump may even extend his own presidential pardons to those involved in the attack.
🎤
Follow Opinions on the news
This is why it’s critical for Biden to establish a record of facts. Accepting a pardon does not technically mean accepting guilt. Trump could even outright reject it. But if he accepts it, or doesn’t turn it down, the document will memorialize the truth.

Trump would have plenty of reasons to take Biden’s gift. A pardon would certainly protect Trump from any federal prosecution once he left office.




Another reason Trump should like this, if not be grateful for it, is that it would enable him to devote all of his administration’s attention to governing instead of seeking revenge and retribution against his enemies. He will have a full plate of pressing national security and domestic problems to address. A “normal” president (which Trump was not in his first term, and which he now has a fresh start to become) would be looking ahead to his historical legacy and reputation, and perhaps strengthening the party that he has been sculpting successfully in his own image.

Recall the pardoning of Richard M. Nixon. The pardoning of Trump should be announced and remembered in the same way. Nixon resigned from office as the House of Representatives was poised to consider and pass three articles of impeachment against him, approved with strong bipartisan support by the House Judiciary Committee, for his role related to the Watergate burglary and coverup effort. Sen. Barry Goldwater (Arizona) and other Republican leaders made it directly clear to Nixon that he would be impeached and convicted. There was no doubt about his guilt from the Watergate tapes. Lawmakers did not urge him directly to resign, but he got the message and resigned. Gerald Ford made the controversial decision to give Nixon a blanket pardon for any crimes he committed while he was president. Ford may have done this out of friendship, but he wanted the nation to end this tragic situation and move on — which it did. The Nixon pardon has long been associated with his guilt, and no one has made a concerted attempt to rewrite this history.

We have, however, seen the rewriting of U.S. history before, which had long-term consequences. This occurred with the South’s establishing its own version of the history of the Civil War. Historians have written much about this, and it was front and center in the fight over Confederate monuments. Southerners memorialized the Civil War as the valiantly fought “Lost Cause” (or as other heroic-sounding names). They long looked fondly on the Confederacy and downplayed or distorted the role and nature of slavery — the reason for the war. They emphasized stories about brave soldiers and the (White) people of the South. Along with the end of Reconstruction and Jim Crow policies, this version of history suppressed racial and civil rights issues for decades.
We cannot let a false history of the Jan. 6 attack go unchallenged. The stakes are too high.

Rudolph

Top ten things about the Rudolph Christmas show, in no particular order:

1. Abominable was an early precursor of British prime minister Boris Johnson.
2. It’s always 2:00 on the snowman’s pocket watch.
3. Santa was a complete dick to the donners. And the elves
4. The reindeer coach urging the young male deer to ostracize Rudolph because of how he looks
5. The Jewish elf with the glasses
6. Yukon cornelius throwing his pick in the air (which, by rule, requires consumption of a shot of Yukon jack)
7. The misfit toys hanging out by a fire as if they were bums in south Philly
8. Yukons sleigh dogs include a poodle, a dachshund, and a King Charles spaniel (to my eye)
9. Apparently the chief elf actually controls work hours and conditions
10. “This is man’s work” (followed by the women ignoring him and promptly getting captured by abominable).

Democrats are paying a terrible price for jumping into bed with Black Lives Matter extremists!!!

It’s little more than a month since the once and future US president Donald Trump defied all odds and trounced the Democratic Party. American voters, outraged by woke cultural policies, delivered the Republicans the presidency, voted out the Democratic majority in the Senate, and confirmed the Republican hold on the House of Representatives. Democrats lost ground in almost every jurisdiction and demographic category.

One might expect forlorn Democrats to be reflecting carefully on their loss and rationally assessing the reasons for it. In Manhattan, however, nothing could be further from the case.

Their failed criminal justice policies went on trial alongside Daniel Penny, a US Marine Corps veteran who in May 2023 restrained Jordan Neely, a violent repeat offender who was on drugs and, according to witnesses, made passengers on the New York City subway fear for their lives. The confrontation resulted in Neely’s death, for which Penny was criminally charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide. Last week, the first charge was dismissed. On Monday, a Manhattan jury acquitted Penny of the second charge.

Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan county district attorney whose office brought the charges against Penny, last year downgraded more than half of felony offences in his jurisdiction to misdemeanours. He also elevated misdemeanour business recordkeeping charges against Donald Trump to felonies on the basis of a dubious legal theory. That case is now practically moribund. Penny’s prosecution went forward, it is widely believed, because he is white and Neely was black.

The Manhattan jury was drawn from a local population that votes more than 80 per cent Democratic. Its decision to find Penny innocent shows, therefore, that Americans of all stripes will not stand for hypocrisy and double standards anymore.

Message not received​

What should have been a powerful message with clear political implications, however, was lost on Black Lives Matter, one of the Democrats’ main constituencies, which grew in prominence after the death in 2020 of George Floyd. Walter “Hawk” Newsome, a co-founder of Black Lives Matter of Greater New York, declared angrily outside the courthouse: “We need some black vigilantes … People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud, how about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us?”

To the American progressive Left, so-called “systemic racism” is so pervasive that apparently nothing Neely did could justify resistance from a threatened citizen, either in his own defence or in the defence of fellow subway passengers. Instead, under DEI-inflected theories of social justice touted by parts of the Democratic Party, so-called “restorative justice” demanded that Penny be singled out for prosecution based on his race and gender.

This approach, rooted in critical race theory, has been a losing proposition at the ballot box. Even solidly Democratic constituencies are starting to wake up from the nightmare that the party has inflicted on many American cities. According to the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, since June 2022 some 21 prosecuting attorneys identified with the restorative justice movement have been forced from office and replaced by prosecutors with records suggesting they are tough on crime.

Some of the departed officials signed an August 2021 letter to President Biden arguing that “‘tough on crime” practices have not created safety and “have been an anathema to justice” and should therefore be abandoned on a national level.

As they have learned in their failed reelection campaigns, their ideas have caused an enormous amount of needless suffering and are woefully unpopular. As Daniel Penny walks free and BLM bellows with indignation, Democrats concerned for the future of their defeated party should take notice.

  • Like
Reactions: TornadoHawk93

Jim Leach personified decency in politics

From the nosebleed environs in what was then known as the Pepsi Center in Denver, I watched former Republican Congressman Jim Leach as he strode across the stage to give a national convention speech in prime time.



But it was the 2008 Democratic National Convention.


Leach walked confidently into Barack Obama’s celebration. After all, what politician doesn’t want to speak to a big, excited crowd.




And, of course, he called for cooperation in the service of the common good.


“In Congress, Democratic senators like Pat Moynihan and Mike Mansfield served in Republican administrations. On the Republican side, Arthur Vandenberg helped President Truman launch the Marshall Plan, and Everett Dirksen backed Lyndon Johnson’s landmark civil rights legislation” said Leach, pointing to crucial bipartisanship in the past.


“In troubled times, it was understood that country comes before party, that in perilous moments mutual concern for the national interest must be the only factor in political judgments,” Leach said. “This does not mean that debate within and between the political parties should not be vibrant. Yet what frustrates so many citizens is the lack of bipartisanship in Washington and the way today’s Republican Party has broken with its conservative heritage.


“This is not a time for politics as usual or for run-of-the-mill politicians. Little is riskier to the national interest than more of the same. America needs new ideas, new energy and a new generation of leadership,” Leach said.





ADVERTISING


Leach personified political decency. And now, in our indecent times, we’ve lost him. Leach died Wednesday at age 82.


Leach had no qualms about crossing party lines.“ “I think he was rather pleased to do it,” Greg Wierzynski, Leach’s former congressional chief of staff and longtime friend said.


“He always wanted to be identified as a Republican. And even when times were hard, like when Tom DeLay was the Republican ringmaster in the House,” Wierzynski said.“ “But I guess the Trump thing, the conversion to the Trump brand of Republicans finally drove him out of the party.”


Leach changed his party affiliation to Democrat in December 2022.


Wierzynski met Leach in 1974 as Republicans weathered the first election after the height of the Watergate Scandal. A year earlier, Leach quit his job at the State Department in protest over Nixon’s order to fire Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox, also known as the Saturday Night Massacre.


In 1974, Wierzynski, a journalist at the time, was talking with Republican National Party Chair Ray Bliss.


“And I said, Ray, how are you going to win the election? Are there any good candidates around, or are they all hiding under rocks? And he said, I'll show you,” Wierzynski said. “And he left the room and came back with Jim Leach. He said, ‘here's a guy, here's one of our candidates,’ and that's how I met Jim.”


Leach lost his congressional bid in 1974 but came back and won in 1976. It was the start of a 30-year congressional career.


Leach was a moderate Republican, even considered liberal on social issues. But by the late 1980s and early 2000s, moderates were disappearing, with their seats taken by far more strident conservative partisans. He was one of six House Republicans who voted in 2002 against the use of force in Iraq. He turned down all PAC contributions.


“That was a Republican Party of Jim Leach, and he never really wavered from that,” Wierzynski said.


“I think he felt increasingly marginalized in his caucus, and that combined with a certain fatigue of 15 terms, and, you know, commuting back and forth every weekend to Iowa, from Washington had taken a certain toll on him,” Wierzynski said.


Leach lost his seat in 2006 in a Democratic wave election to Cornell College Professor Dave Loebsack. It was a surprise, given the support Leach had built from the main streets of rural counties to the liberal bastion of Iowa City.


But so many of Leach’s accomplishments transcended politics.


“I direct a program that is funded largely by the U.S. State Department. And Jim was a great ally of our efforts to bring distinguished American International writers to our UNESCO city of literature,” said Chris Merrill, director of the International Writing Program at the University of Iowa.


“I also had the good luck to serve on his National Council for the Humanities when he was the chair of that institution, and I got to watch him work up close. I was always impressed with his range of reference, his ability to read a room and read the times, and most especially by his talent for storytelling,” Merrill said.


The arts held a special, important place for Leach and his wife Deba, who is an art historian. He saw it as a critical tool in diplomacy. But like Republican moderation, Leach’s brand of international relations has faded.


“The America first idea almost always leads to America last, or America forgotten, or when you see the sorts of attacks that are just daily a part of political discourse at this moment,” Merrill said. “Jim was never the kind of public figure who would reduce himself to that. He always honored his interlocutors’ position, even if he didn't agree with it, and he would disagree with those folks in always a polite manner, and he modeled a way of being in the world that I have taken to heart,” Merrill said.


While chairing the National Endowment for the Humanities, Leach visited all 50 states in what became known as a civility tour.


“One of the difficulties in public life is one has to respect almost every perspective, but particularly one has to respect the constitutional process, and we have an elected president, and it's in all of our interests to hope that any administration succeeds, and we should work together to try to see that happens,” Leach told public radio host Diane Rehm in 2009.


“Now, having said that, that doesn't mean there isn't a big role for vigorous differentiation, and so how you balance that out is the challenge,” Leach said.


Wierzynski said the world that comes to mind when he thinks of Leach is “rectitude.” And an element of modesty.


“You know, in just about every congressional office you walk into, there is a wall full of pictures of Congressman Smith with the President, Congressman Smith with the Secretary of State, Congressman Smith, with the President of France, or whatever,” Wierzynski said.


“Jim rebuffed that. His office was lined with prints and paintings from his collection,” Wierzynski said. It was his, you know, his modesty, and at the same time his interest in things that were more than mundane.”


But Leach’s humility receded when it came to his accomplishments as a wrestler. He won a state title in 1960 for Davenport High School.


“He liked to say that he'd been inducted in the Wrestling Hall of Fame,” Wierzynski said.


"I’ve always thought that the most equalitarian place in the world is the wrestling mat," Leach said in a 2009 interview. "You have two people operating with the same goal in mind and abiding by the same rules. Wrestlers may differ in height and body type, but it’s hard to say who has the natural advantage."


Wrestle hard, respect your opponent and follow the rules. Jim Leach lived by those rules. And will be missed.

Supreme Court to Hear Catholic Charity’s Bid for Tax Exemption

The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether Wisconsin was free to deny a tax exemption to a Catholic charity on the grounds that its activities were not primarily religious.
The court has been notably receptive to arguments from religious groups, and the new case will give the justices another opportunity to explore the limits of the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberty.
The case concerns a Wisconsin law that exempts religious groups from state unemployment taxes so long as they are “operated primarily for religious purposes.”
Catholic Charities Bureau, the social ministry of the Catholic Diocese in Superior, Wis., has said its mission is to provide “services to the poor and disadvantaged as an expression of the social ministry of the Catholic Church.” State officials determined that the charity did not qualify for the exemption because it “provides essentially secular services and engages in activities that are not religious per se.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


The Wisconsin Supreme Court said it accepted the charity’s contention that its services were “based on Gospel values and the principles of the Catholic social teachings.” But the court ruled that the group’s activities were “primarily charitable and secular” and did not “attempt to imbue program participants with the Catholic faith nor supply any religious materials to program participants or employees.”
The court added that “both employment with the organizations and services offered by the organizations are open to all participants regardless of religion.”
Eric Rassbach, a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the charity, questioned that reasoning. “Wisconsin is trying to make sure no good deed goes unpunished,” he said in a statement Friday. “Penalizing Catholic Charities for serving Catholics and non-Catholics alike is ridiculous and wrong.”
The charity asked the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in, saying that the Constitution does not allow the government “to second-guess the religious decisions of religious bodies.”
It would be absurd, the charity’s petition seeking review added, to say that “it doesn’t matter if Catholic Charities gives a cup of water in Jesus’s name, because nonreligious charities offer cups of water too.”



State officials urged the court to deny review. “Courts routinely deny religious tax exemptions to entities that assert religious motivations,” their brief said, “without overly entangling themselves in religious matters.”
Proponents of the separation of church and state said a ruling in favor of the charity could have a sweeping impact, eventually including organizations like Catholic hospitals and universities.
“The next stage of this is getting these large employers to be exempt,” said Patrick Elliott, legal director of the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
The key question, he said, should not be whether a charity’s motivations are religious, but whether participation in the tax system in some way hampers its religious expression.
“The exemption is there to protect churches from interference, and now they’re taking it and running with it and saying it covers anything religiously affiliated,” he said. “It’s not a good system if a religious entity can just opt themselves out even when it’s not interfering with their religious practice.”

BREAKING NEWS - Victims ‘shocked’ after Biden grants clemency to ‘kids-for-cash’ judge

Victims of major public corruption cases in Pennsylvania are angry that President Joe Biden granted clemency this week to two convicted officials.

The commutations were announced Thursday as part of a historic clemency package for 1,500 convicted criminals who, the White House said, “deserve a second chance.”

The two convicted officials whose cases sparked outrage – a crooked Pennsylvania judge and a notorious Illinois fraudster – both had already been released from prison early and put on house arrest during the Covid-19 pandemic. Biden’s actions now end that punishment.

The president has already faced bipartisan criticism over his highly controversial pardon of his son Hunter Biden, who was convicted earlier this year of 12 tax and gun crimes.

‘Got it absolutely wrong’​

Former Pennsylvania Judge Michael Conahan was convicted in 2011 in what was infamously called the “kids-for-cash” scandal, where he took kickbacks from for-profit detention centers in exchange for wrongly sending juveniles to their facilities. The case was widely considered to be one of the worst judicial scandals in Pennsylvania history.
Like all of the other nearly 1,500 people who got commutations from Biden this week, Conahan was freed from prison due to Covid. His house arrest was set to end in 2026.

The misconduct of Conahan and another Luzerne County judge led the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to throw out 4,000 juvenile convictions, and the discredited state judges were ordered to pay $200 million to the victims, according to the Associated Press.

Sandy Fonzo – the mother of Edward Kenzakoski, who died by suicide after spending time behind bars as part of the kickback scheme – said she was “shocked… and hurt” after learning of Biden’s decision to commute the rest of Conahan’s punishment.

“Conahan‘s actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son‘s death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power,” Fonzo told the Citizens’ Voice, a local outlet. “This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer. Right now I am processing and doing the best I can to cope with the pain that this has brought back.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, also said Friday at an unrelated news conference in Biden’s hometown of Scranton that, “I do feel strongly that President Biden got it absolutely wrong and created a lot of pain here in northeastern Pennsylvania.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT