We share our initial thoughts on the Hawkeyes playing No. 19 Missouri in the Music City Bowl, plus dive into Iowa's needs in the transfer portal.

Players Missouri is missing thanks to opt outs and injuries, comparing playing the Tigers to playing Tennessee last season, who Iowa has lost in the portal so far, what impact those departures have, the Hawkeyes' biggest needs in the portal + how they can fill those gaps, and more.

PODCAST:

Were always discussing whether this or that coach is better. I've stated that the top schools coaches MAY get a bit more credit then they actually deserve. Here's a fun fact from todays "The B1G Show". Why is todays game between OSU and PSU so important for both coaches? Ryan Day is 2-7 vs top 5 teams in his tenure at OSU, while Franklin is 1-13 against the top 5 in his time in Happy Valley. Thats 2-7 and 1-13. Combined they are 3-20 against top 5 teams. So would Kirk or Bret or Fitz REALLY be any worse at those schools? Is it X's and O's or Jimmies and Joes?

Kirk's son, interesting

Login to view embedded media

Now that the cooler weather has creeped into Texas, I find the need to run my heater from time to time. Lately, it has been cycling on and off very quickly. Like the fan will come on for a second or two then kick off just as it gets up to speed. Then it's off for a few seconds and kicks back on for another second or two. Then off again. The process goes on for 5 or 6 cycles then it comes on and stays on until the room warms up. I can also hear a faint, intermittent rubbing noise from the fan.
I had the whole system replaced less than three years ago so everything is under warranty. What's going on? I have a tech scheduled to come out tomorrow afternoon, but I'd like to get an idea of what's happening.

Just curious who the fans would like to see Iowa play… looks like a lot of the websites are saying Ole Miss… not so sure I like that matchup? Also seeing Missouri, Boston College (no thanks even a more boring team) not sure who else but would like to see them play someone like Clemson or someone they’ve never played before .

But I forgot about Drake.

In all seriousness, Iowa is undoubtedly the best in the state.

Joking aside, I bet Drake would give Iowa State all they want & then some.

Especially if the game was in Des Moines.

Booo:

President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday announced he will nominate Paul Atkins, a former federal regulator who now advises financial firms and cryptocurrency companies, to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The choice foreshadowed a significant political shift for Washington’s leading cop on Wall Street, signaling that the SEC under Republican control is likely to pursue a deregulatory agenda while easing up on some of its enforcement activities.

It also underscored Trump’s aggressive courtship of a crypto industry he once derided as a “scam,” months after executives and investors backed his campaign financially in the hopes of securing a more favorable regulatory environment in Washington.

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

“Paul is a proven leader for common sense regulations,” Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media network. “He believes in the promise of robust, innovative capital markets that are responsive to the needs of Investors, & that provide capital to make our Economy the best in the World. He also recognizes that digital assets & other innovations are crucial to Making America Greater than Ever Before.”


ADVERTISING

If confirmed by the Senate, Atkins would assume the helm of one of the nation’s leading watchdog agencies, with a vast mandate to protect investors, monitor markets and pursue fraud. It would mark his second major stint at the SEC, where Atkins served as a Republican commissioner 16 years ago — a term from 2002 to 2008 that concluded before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
At the time, Atkins emerged as an outspoken critic of the SEC’s approach to cracking down on corporate misdeeds, and he opposed large penalties levied against companies that agreed to settle fraud charges. Supporters of these fines said they deterred wrongdoing, but Atkins argued they impacted stock prices and punished shareholders, who have already been victimized by a company’s actions.

Atkins currently leads Patomak Global Partners, a consultancy, where his clients include financial services firms under the SEC’s watch. He also serves as a co-chair of the Token Alliance, an initiative of the Chamber of Digital Commerce — a lobbying group — and advises the crypto industry on regulation globally.


“If the government, if the SEC, were more accommodating, and would deal straightforwardly with these various [crypto] firms, I think it would be a lot better to have things happen here in the United States rather than outside,” Atkins said on a podcast last year.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi..._magnet-trump-presidency_inline_collection_10
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli..._magnet-trump-presidency_inline_collection_13

Atkins would replace the SEC’s current chairman, Gary Gensler, whose tenure under President Joe Biden has been marked by a broad — and, to some, unfair — crackdown on crypto giants.

In recent years, the SEC under Gensler has brought fraud cases involving a wave of crypto firms, including FTX, once the third-largest crypto exchange. It has also sparred in court with Coinbase and Kraken, two other trading platforms, and Ripple, which launched the XRP token, for allegedly failing to adhere to federal law requiring registration of their offerings — charges they each deny.


In a bid to woo the crypto industry, Trump this summer announced at a widely attended crypto conference that he would “fire” Gensler, which drew boisterous applause from the crowd of thousands, many sporting “make bitcoin great again” hats modeled after Trump’s campaign slogan.

Since the election, though, Gensler has announced he would resign his SEC post — paving the way for the incoming president to begin identifying a range of pro-crypto candidates to lead the SEC and other key agencies that oversee the industry.

1. On the toilet
2. Oil change
3. During SO stupid tv shows
4. Work
5. While watching sports

Totally worth it.

Login to view embedded media

Herbstreit and Saban really trying to prepare us that Alabama is going to get in over SMU.

Who gets in?

Florida Gators and Dallas Cowboys for me.

How about you?

Craigslist, FB Marketplace etc.

I like looking at big boats and airplanes. The planes especially.

No interest in buying a plane but they’re cool to look at.

Any leaks coming out as to where Iowa will go? Is there an official time when it’s announced today?

I am hoping Music City. Our family moved to the Nashville area in 89. Parents and siblings still live there. So free place to stay😊.

We went a few years back when Iowa was going to play Missouri. We were crushed the game for cancelled. We made the trip early to spend time with family.

Lots of speculation. Will it be formally announced today?

Ayden Price, walk-on WR out of WDM Valley, will enter the portal. Super productive in high school. Had Army, Air Force and FCS offers.

Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media

Good riddance, murderer.

A month after securing the White House with populist promises to working class voters, President-elect Donald Trump has chosen at least half a dozen billionaires and several other ultra-wealthy business leaders to serve in top administration roles.

Get the latest election news and results

Trump’s Cabinet is on track to be one of the richest in modern history, on par only with the team of millionaires and billionaires he assembled during his first term. He’s picked billionaires to serve as commerce secretary and education secretary, and he has tapped other ultra-wealthy leaders for treasury and interior. He’s also offered noncabinet positions, including NASA director and deputy defense secretary, to billionaires.

Throughout the transition, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, has been by Trump’s side, serving as “first buddy” and establishing the nongovernmental “Department of Government Efficiency.” On Thursday night, Trump tapped tech investor David Sacks — who made his fortune in part through the $1.2 billion sale of the software company Yammer to Microsoft — to serve as his artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency czar.



Trump’s team of rivals stands in stark contrast to Biden’s Cabinet, which had a combined net worth of $118 million in the first year of his presidency, according to Forbes. Trump’s picks have not yet released their financial disclosures, but his 2025 Cabinet is likely to be even richer than the first Trump Cabinet, which had a combined net worth of $6.2 billion.

Linda McMahon, whom Trump says he will nominate for education secretary, shares a net worth of $3 billion with her husband Vincent McMahon, according to Forbes. Howard Lutnick, Trump’s pick for commerce secretary, has a net worth of at least $2.2 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Trump’s treasury choice, Scott Bessent, managed billion-dollar hedge funds, but his exact net worth has not yet been reported. Doug Burgum, Trump’s pick for interior, is worth at least $100 million, Forbes said.
🏛️
Follow Politics
The median net worth of an American family is $192,900, according to a 2023 Federal Reserve report.



Wealthy Americans who have had successful careers in business have long served in government, but watchdog groups say the high concentration of ultra-wealthy picks for roles in Trump’s Cabinet presents distinct conflict of interest risks and could work against promises Trump — a billionaire himself — made on the campaign trail. As he crisscrossed the country to host rallies, Trump repeatedly promised to fight for the rights of working and middle class Americans by bringing back manufacturing jobs and limiting inflation.
Trump’s selections may be more inclined to look out for the interests of their own businesses and their fellow billionaires than for working-class voters, said Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
“It is hard to see how a Cabinet made up largely of the very, very wealthiest of Americans is going to have an understanding of what the needs of regular Americans are,” he said.



Trump, who has an estimated net worth of $5.5 billion, has long aligned himself with other wealthy business leaders, delighting in attention and praise from those he regards as successful executives.
Trump-Vance Transition spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement that Trump has made “brilliant decisions” on picks for his second administration and cabinet.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech..._magnet-trump-presidency_inline_collection_13

“Many of these individuals have experienced the American Dream and want to keep that dream alive for future generations,” she said.
But the Cabinet selections are an early test of Trump’s ability to unite a transformed Republican Party, where the goals of populists who say they are focused on elevating the working class can clash with those of the business leaders and wealthy donors who have long shaped the party’s policies. Even some Republicans have expressed worries about the composition of Trump’s Cabinet.



Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) expressed concern about the business backgrounds of some of Trump’s picks in an interview with Politico on Tuesday.
“All these Treasury secretaries, my point is, always end up being sort of Wall Street guys. Do I think that’s a great trend? Not really,” Hawley said.
After making several industry-friendly picks, Trump made a nod to the growing populist wing of the Republican Party by picking the union-friendly Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-Oregon) to lead the Labor Department.
Oren Cass, the founder and chief economist at the conservative think tank American Compass, said he is optimistic that the new Trump administration will be more oriented toward populist goals than the first. He said the best example is Trump’s selection of JD Vance for vice president, who stands in stark contrast to former vice president Mike Pence, who has warned rising populism undermines the “traditional conservative agenda.”



“Some of them offer a lot of cause for optimism,” Cass said. “It’s the sort of thing where [the] rubber meets road when the administration actually starts.”
Democrats have roundly criticized Trump’s choices. The Democratic Party on Tuesday put out a news release that said Trump was “stacking his Cabinet with out of touch billionaires.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) told The Washington Post that the choices suggest Trump’s presidency will “be one giveaway after another for the wealthy and well-connected.”
“He’s nominating his ‘rich-as-hell’ buddies to run every facet of our economy, corrupting our government at the expense of ordinary Americans,” she said.

Watchdog groups are concerned about the new conflicts of interests that Trump’s nominees could present. Trump’s first-term commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, violated an ethics agreement by improperly reporting his stock holdings and faced scrutiny for his financial dealings while in office.


Many business leaders who enter government roles put their assets in blind trusts to preempt concerns that they could abuse their political power to benefit their personal portfolios. But watchdog groups are skeptical that even those vehicles provide an adequate shield against ethics risks.
“People who spend their entire lives getting rich do not automatically forget their economic stakes when they enter government,” said Jeff Hauser, the executive director of the Revolving Door Project.

Trump himself has not promised to divest from any of his businesses, which have now soared and include a cryptocurrency business and a stake in a social media company. And with Trump’s own party controlling both chambers of Congress and a Cabinet packed with his allies and loyalists, he can expect little oversight over his finances, Bookbinder said.
“People in government take a cue from the top,” he said. “This time around, Donald Trump, is not — at least as of now — even making a show of addressing his own conflicts of interest.”

Howdy and welcome to a big-time evening for the Hawkeyes, who are at the Barclays to face Tennessee.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

It’s been eight years since Republicans won a trifecta of the House, Senate, and Governor’s Office in Iowa. Their mandate was supposed to usher in a new era of population growth and economic dynamism. Instead of delivering on everyday issues, though, Republicans governed like they owned the place and forced through one wildly unpopular law after another — private school vouchers, defunding Area Education Agencies, and their six-week abortion ban, among others.



This isn’t the Iowa I grew up in. We don’t hear about the bipartisanship of the Bob Ray era or Iowa being the “silicon prairie” of the nation anymore. It's left many Iowans to ask basic questions. Where are all the good-paying jobs? Where are all the people? Unfortunately, poor rankings from nonpartisan sources have provided some answers.


Atlas Van Lines found that we’re the seventh-highest state for people moving away. The National Bureau of Economic Research reported that we have the 10th highest brain drain — college students leaving after graduation — in the country.




The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis noted that we’re the 45th state for personal income growth and had the 4th slowest growing gross domestic product. Although Republicans like some of the rosier rankings from U.S. News and World Report, they often leave out that they also ranked us as the 14th worst state economy.


Many of us won’t be surprised to know that WalletHub found Iowa has the third highest energy costs. The Federal Highway Administration noted we have the second worst bridges in the nation. And our insurance premiums continue to skyrocket thanks, in part, to 48% of our levees being deemed insufficient by the Army Corps of Engineers.


The pride of Iowa — enough to put a schoolhouse on our state quarter — has been our education system. Unfortunately, the National Institute for Early Educational Research found that we rank 39th for preschool funding. U.S. News reported that we fell from third to eleventh in K-12 education. WalletHub puts us at 20.


For health rankings, we have the second highest cancer rate of all states according to the University of Iowa. Becker’s Hospital Review found we rank as the 43rd state for active physicians. Even before the abortion ban, we were the worst state for OB-GYNs according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging found that we come in 49th for nursing home inspectors.





ADVERTISING


Of course, these lousy rankings aren’t a reflection on Iowans. Instead, they’re a failure of the politicians running this state for nearly a decade. Republicans have talked a lot about how their votes — year after year — were meant to turn Iowa into the “Florida of the North.” Unfortunately, their nearly complete control has given us Florida’s feverish culture wars without any of the economic dynamism.


Pointing out where we’re coming up short isn’t enough. As the saying goes, any jackass can kick over a barn, but it takes a carpenter to actually build one. Iowa’s Democratic legislators have proposed bills on all these issues, but most haven’t even received a subcommittee hearing in the hypercharged politics at our statehouse.


As a first-term legislator, that made it clear to me the only way we can start the cleanup is to get more reasonable people elected. Unfortunately, this past election made the road back to common sense even harder as we lost seats in the statehouse. That made a few things clear to me. Many voters probably won’t vote their disapproval over vouchers or the AEAs, unfortunately, until schools are actually closing down and students are losing services. As Republicans changed their minds and learned to love “banking the vote” this year, we need to refocus Democratic attentions on early voting as well. And we need to focus on much more intensive, much earlier candidate recruitment. Amazing people can win elections regardless of party and, sometimes, in the unlikeliest of places.


In Trump’s first midterms in 2018, we held a Democratic seat in the U.S. House, flipped two more, and came a few points away from a total sweep with the 4th District. In the Iowa House, we flipped seven seats that year alone. I have no reason to think that the next Trump administration will be any less destructive or provoke a weaker desire to throw the bums out in 2026. Like 2018, I hope that good people from both parties can be clear-eyed about how we stack up nationally and — together — find people committed to get Iowa growing again.


State Rep. Sean Bagniewski is a Democrat representing House District 35 in central Iowa.

The B10 and B12 Champs are both transfers from the PAC 12.