ADVERTISEMENT

Women's Top 25 Polls & NET (12/23)

Women's AP Top 25 (12/23)
1. UCLA (30) (12-0)

2. South Carolina (1) (11-1)
3. Notre Dame (1) (10-2)
4. USC (11-1)
5. Texas (12-1)
6. LSU (14-0)
7. Connecticut (10-2)
8. Maryland (11-0)
9. Oklahoma (11-1)
10. Ohio State (12-0)
11. TCU (12-1)
12. Kansas State (13-1)
13. Georgia Tech (13-0)
14. Duke (10-3)
15. Tennessee (11-0)
16. Kentucky (10-1)
17. North Carolina (12-2)
18. West Virginia (10-2)
19. Michigan State (11-1)
20. Alabama (12-1)
21. California (13-1)
22. North Carolina State (9-3)
23. Michigan (10-2)
24. Iowa (10-2)

25. Mississippi (8-3)

Others Receiving Votes
Nebraska
, Vanderbilt, Utah, Illinois, Oklahoma State, Harvard, Baylor, Florida State

Dropped Out
Nebraska (#23)


================================

Coaches Poll

Released on Tuesday, December 24
  • Like
Reactions: Torg

Jamie Cavey Lang, former Iowa women’s basketball player and color commentator, dies at 41

Jamie Cavey Lang Jamie Cavey Lang


The Gazette offers audio versions of articles using Instaread. Some words may be mispronounced.
IOWA CITY — One of the first successful post projects of the Lisa Bluder/Jan Jensen women’s basketball era at the University of Iowa, Jamie Cavey Lang died Saturday.



She was 41.


Visitation will be 4-7 p.m. Thursday at The Celebration Farm, located 4696 Robin Woods Lane NE, Iowa City. Funeral Mass will be 10:30 a.m. Friday at St. Mary Catholic Church, Solon.




A native of Mechanicsville, Lang was a member of North Cedar’s Class 2A state championship team in 2000.


She played for the Hawkeyes from 2001 through 2005 and compiled 1,265 career points (27th in program history), 506 rebounds (31st) and 94 blocks (eighth). She was a two-time all-Big Ten performer, earning second-team honors as a senior, and was a member of NCAA tournament teams in 2002 and 2004.


Cavey Lang earned both a Bachelor of Arts and a master's degree at Iowa, and later played professional basketball in Europe.


She spent several years alongside play-by-play announcer Rob Brooks as color commentator on the Hawkeye Radio Network.





She is survived by her husband Mike, children Vincent, Bennett and Sydney, parents Patrick and Pam Cavey, siblings Ann (Jack) Jameson, Kelsie (Chad) Dotterer and Jason (Stacey) Cavey, grandmother Sharon Mertka, father and mother-in-law Ken and Jayne Lang, sisters-in-law Amie (Joe) Stewart, Melissa (Mark) Storm, Abbie (Eric) Mahoney and Chantelle (Bob) Foote, and many loved nieces and nephews.

Taxes, defining gender, 'Blue Dot' among Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen 2025 legislative priorities

Despite facing a $432 million shortfall ahead of Nebraska’s next budget cycle, Gov. Jim Pillen reiterated his commitment to pushing for more property tax relief in the upcoming legislative session.
Earlier this month, Pillen outlined his top four priorities for the 2025 legislative session, labeling the concepts as kids, taxes, agriculture and values.
What that translates to in terms of policy is supporting an expected bill from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha to restrict access to bathrooms and locker rooms on the basis of biological sex and add similar restrictions to most school sports teams, continue to push for property tax relief by means of reworking Nebraska’s school funding formula, new legislation to ban the sale of lab-grown meat, and continuing the attempt to return the state’s presidential elections to a winner-take-all system.


Among those four, Pillen confirmed in a World-Herald interview that property taxes remain his top priority. But it won’t be easy to get there considering the shortfall, and lawmakers have expressed mixed opinions on whether there will be room for any new tax relief in 2025.

Pillen said he plans to accomplish this by doing something that has never been done before — pass a budget with negative spending compared to the previous fiscal year.
As for how he plans to do that, Pillen listed several broad ideas. He said he will focus on funding what he considers needs not wants, do more to pursue federal dollars for Nebraska, trim down historic statutes with appropriations attached to them, and limit “Christmas tree bills” in the Legislature.

A “Christmas tree bill” is a legislative term used to describe a single piece of legislation that has multiple bills packaged into it. Lawmakers have leaned into the strategy in recent years as filibusters have become more common. Loading up one bill allows separate pieces of legislation to pass and maintain productivity during the session.





Gov. Jim Pillen listens to a reporter’s question during an interview Monday in the Governor’s Office in the Nebraska State Capitol in Lincoln. Pillen said his appreciation for Nebraska has grown with each day of his first term, and his vision for leadership has remained unchanged, with easing the burden of property taxes his top priority.
CHRIS MACHIAN, THE WORLD-HERALD
But Pillen said he’s concerned that lumping multiple bills into one package means individual bills pass without adequate debate, and could lead to unchecked government spending. In recent years, however, the bills added to these packages have had little to no fiscal impact.

While Pillen initially said he wants to stop the practice of “Christmas tree bills,” he quickly amended that statement to clarify he is just going to pay closer attention to such bills when they reach his desk.

“I’m not going to tell the Legislature how to run,” Pillen said. “All I’m going to say is I’m going to be a fiscally responsible governor.”
The governor also reiterated his past ideas to simplify the school funding formula, though he did not provide specifics on how he plans to do so. Pillen’s office recently released a report stating that 80% of the increase in school property taxes this year related to a drop in state aid.



The governor also reiterated his past ideas to simplify the school funding formula, though he did not provide specifics on how he plans to do so. Pillen’s office recently released a report stating that 80% of the increase in school property taxes this year related to a drop in state aid.

“The state needs to fund K-12 education, not run it,” Pillen said.

Pillen also expressed his continued interest in bringing up sales tax revenues as a way to offset property taxes. He noted that neighboring states like Iowa are “slaughtering” Nebraska in property taxes because they have higher sales taxes.
This aspect of Pillen’s proposal during this summer’s special session was met with strong public opposition from residents who saw it as a tax shift, rather than a decrease. However, Pillen denied that there was opposition to his plan, and claimed that public support was actually “overwhelming,” and that his team simply needs to improve the communication and understanding of his plan.


On the argument that it’s a tax shift, Pillen turned it around, and said it was past Nebraska lawmakers who approved sales tax exemptions who were actually doing a tax shift.

Defining gender by reproductive systems​

Another top priority for Pillen is Kauth’s bill, which she said will effectively codify Pillen’s 2023 executive order establishing a “Women’s Bill of Rights.” The order dictates that males and females are defined specifically by their reproductive systems. Kauth said she plans to expand this rule to apply to all state-led entities, including state departments, prisons, and K-12 and higher education.


Pillen said his main motive for supporting this measure is his desire to keep children safe and keep athletic competitions fair.

“If our children decide they want to become somebody different after … they get through adolescence, I love them the same,” Pillen said.

However, Kauth’s proposal, as she explained it, would impact transgender adults as well as children.
When asked about that, Pillen said he “couldn’t speak to that.”

Ending the ‘Blue Dot’​

Pillen said he also hopes to end the practice of dividing Nebraska’s electoral votes in presidential elections by congressional district, and bring the state back to a winner-take-all system. Pillen pushed for this late in the 2024 session, and even flirted with the idea of calling a second special session to debate the issue, but there was never enough support in the Legislature to pass it.

Now, with a new Legislature and 33 Republicans — enough votes to survive a likely filibuster — Pillen is optimistic.




“If you’re a Republican and you don’t believe in that, you’re not a Republican,” Pillen said in an interview.

Nebraska is one of two states that divides its electoral votes, along with Maine, which makes the state “an outlier in a bad way,” Pillen said.
Some Republican lawmakers have expressed interest in pursuing winner-take-all through a constitutional amendment, which, if approved by the Legislature, would require a successful vote of the people in 2026 to officially take effect. Pillen was resistant to the idea, saying that he doesn’t want to lock the state’s way of electing the president into the Nebraska Constitution, because it would be even more difficult to change if it were ever necessary.

‘Take a breath’ on abortion policy​

One hot topic that’s not an upcoming priority for Pillen is abortion policy. He said he was grateful that Nebraskans approved Initiative 434 in November, which cemented the state’s 12-week abortion ban into the state Constitution.


Abortion-rights advocates feared that the success of Initiative 434 would mean anti-abortion lawmakers would move to increase restrictions further. Pillen himself said in 2023 that he hopes to eventually fully ban abortion in Nebraska. But on Monday, he told the World-Herald that he won’t push for new abortion restrictions in 2025.
“What’s important at this stage in the game is that we all take a moment, take a breath, and be grateful for what took place and what the people said, and have that conversation at a later time,” Pillen said.

Nebraska continues to struggle with a statewide labor shortage, which has a particular impact on rural areas, but that also did not make the list of Pillen’s priorities next year.
When asked about the labor shortage, Pillen agreed it remained an issue, but did not specify any new plans to fill the gaps. Instead, he highlighted recent efforts, including state funding for community colleges and the Presidential Scholarship for Nebraska students who earn a perfect score on their ACT. He said the way to solve Nebraska’s workforce issues is to ensure the state’s students remain in the state.

Why does the media always stir the pot?

They can't help questioning everything Kirk and the staff do regarding recruiting and portal activity.

I trust our coaches to know how to properly vet players for fit, skill set and academics (yes, they still are students). NIL also is a component, Iowa's NIL is probably $1 - $2M. Verses many schools spending 10X that amount. Not sure you want to be the highest bidder for alot of the players. They could be just looking for the dollars. Are those players thinking team first or me first?

Looking at many of the media types, I question if they've every played the game.

Final thought, you need to let younger players - play and develop. Development programs can't loose their identity. I think that has happened at Wisconsin.

Jay Higgins is UNANIMOUS 1st Team All American. Kirk Ferentz has coached 13 of IOWA's 16 Unanimous & 18 of IOWA's 33 Consensus 1st Team All Americans

Dec 18 Update:

Last season Tory Taylor and Cooper DeJean become the 14th and 15th unanimous consensus All-Americans in Iowa history.

Today, Jay becomes the 16th.

Kirk Ferentz has coached 13 of the 16.

GBFW0CjWQAA4klk



Login to view embedded media
Login to view embedded media

Original Post (Dec 16):

Login to view embedded media

  • Poll
Better to Get in Playoff and Smashed or Make a Bowl and End Season on High

Playoff Beating or Winning to Finish Season?

  • Making The Field Regardless, Experience is Vital

    Votes: 44 71.0%
  • Playing Against a Portal weakened Alabama and Winning, Prestige

    Votes: 6 9.7%
  • Winning It All!!!!! (Obviously)

    Votes: 12 19.4%

We've seen some really bad playoff games in ten years. Mainly Oklahoma and Notre Dame every time they've made it. Michigan State got dogwalked in their lone appearance and Florida State got Winstoned in their appearance.

With the playoff expanding and a GO5 school guaranteed a slot, I think we're going to see somebody get folded. I think Clemson and Indiana get that treatment this weekend. I think SMU and Tennessee keep it tight but ultimately lose.

As an Iowa fan would you rather make the field and get treated like Cowboy at a Taylor Swift concert, or win a competitive Bowl against an Alabama or Miami? The obvious answer would be to just win it all, but that's too easy.

Michael Brewer, Whose ‘One Toke’ Was a Big Hit, Is Dead at 80

Michael Brewer, half of the folk-rock duo Brewer & Shipley, who scored an unlikely Top 10 hit in 1971 with “One Toke Over the Line” — one of the most overt pop odes to marijuana of the hippie era and presumably the only one to be performed on the squeaky-clean “Lawrence Welk Show” — died on Tuesday at his home near Branson, Mo. He was 80.
His death was confirmed in a social media post by his longtime recording and performing partner, Tom Shipley. No cause was given.
While often categorized as a one-hit wonder, Brewer & Shipley actually notched two other singles on the Billboard Hot 100: “Tarkio Road,” which climbed to No. 55 in June 1970, and “Shake Off the Demon,” which sneaked in at No. 98 in February 1972.
Image

Mr. Brewer, left, and Mr. Shipley met in a coffee house in Kent, Ohio.Credit...Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images
The duo, who recorded many albums in the 1970s and a few more in the ’90s, were known for their songs’ socially conscious lyrics on topics like the Vietnam War. But it was their sunny signature tune, with its indelible line “One toke over the line, sweet Jesus,” that etched them into pop-culture history.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


At the outset, Mr. Brewer and Mr. Shipley considered the song anything but a potentially career-defining composition. “We wrote it literally entertaining ourselves and to make our friends laugh,” Mr. Brewer recalled in a 2022 interview on the music podcast “A Breath of Fresh Air.”
The two were between sets during a gig at a nightclub in Kansas City, Mo., when inspiration, fueled by some potent cannabis, hit.
“We were getting ready to go onstage for our fourth set,” Mr. Brewer said, “and a friend came by with some really good Lebanese hash. We stepped out back and took a couple of tokes and came back in to tune up for our last set, and Tom said, ‘Man, I’m one toke over the line.’ And I just cracked up.”
Mr. Brewer began improvising a melody around that line, and the next day the two banged out the song in about an hour.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


At the time, they were recording their third album, “Tarkio” (1970), and considered “One Toke” too trifling to commit to wax. They performed it live only out of necessity when they opened for the singer-songwriter Melanie at Carnegie Hall not long afterward.
“We went over really well, had a couple of encores, and then we basically ran out of songs,” Mr. Brewer told Rockcellar magazine in 2012. “We said, ‘Let’s do that new song. Nothin’ to lose.’ So we did, and everybody loved it.”
To their surprise, their record label insisted that they include it on their forthcoming album. The next thing they knew, it was a single, which peaked at No. 10 on the Billboard singles chart in April 1971. But as Brewer & Shipley would soon find out, that was a fraught era for drug songs.

Charles Michael Brewer was born on April 14, 1944, in Oklahoma City, the eldest of four children. He played drums and sang in a rock band in high school before switching to guitar. After graduation in 1962, he began performing his own songs in coffee houses around the country and eventually met Mr. Shipley, who grew up near Cleveland, at one in Kent, Ohio.
Settling in San Francisco in 1965, Mr. Brewer formed the duo Mastin & Brewer with the singer-songwriter Tom Mastin, whose song “How Do You Feel” would be recorded by Jefferson Airplane. After moving to Los Angeles, the two signed with Columbia Records and formed a band that opened for top acts like the Byrds and Buffalo Springfield.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Mr. Mastin, who suffered from depression, left the band before they could cut an album. Mr. Brewer then joined forces with Mr. Shipley, who by then was living near him in Los Angeles, and they signed on as staff songwriters for a publishing arm of A&M Records.
“Michael and I were both Midwesterners, Midwestern values,” Mr. Shipley said in “One Toke Over the Line … and Still Smokin’,” a 2021 documentary about the duo. “Neither one of us were looking for stardom.”
Still, they started playing their own compositions around town and recorded their first album, “Down in L.A.,” released by A&M in 1968.
The success of “One Toke Over the Line,” recorded after the duo returned to the Midwest, brought complications. In September 1970, Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, in a speech in Las Vegas, warned that drug use was threatening “to sap our national strength” and called out a number of pop songs, including the Beatles’ “With a Little Help From My Friends” and the Byrds’ “Eight Miles High,” as “latent drug culture propaganda.”
Within a year, under the Nixon administration, the Federal Communications Commission warned broadcasters about playing songs with lyrics that might promote drug use. As a result, “One Toke Over the Line” was banned by radio stations in Buffalo, Miami, Houston, Washington, Chicago, Dallas and New York. Brewer & Shipley, Mr. Brewer said, came to embrace the crackdown as “a badge of honor.”
Information about his survivors was not immediately available.
The duo continued to perform for years, and Mr. Brewer also made a few albums as a solo artist.
  • Sad
Reactions: h-hawk

Defense Secretary Austin orders renaming of military bases with Confederate ties - will cost 62.5 million.

According to the commission’s report, Fort Benning will be named Fort Moore; Fort Polk will be renamed Fort Johnson; Fort Bragg will become Fort Liberty; Fort Gordon will become Fort Eisenhower; Fort Hood will become Fort Cavazos; Fort Lee will become Fort Gregg-Adams; Fort Pickett will become Fort Barfoot; Fort Rucker will be renamed to Fort Novosel.

...

The federally mandated Naming Committee estimated the undertaking to cost as much as $62.5 million, according to Stars and Stripes.


Full article:
  • Haha
Reactions: h-hawk

Iowa joins states opposing tribe over Dakota Access pipeline

A federal judge has allowed 13 more Republican-led states — including Iowa — to intervene as codefendants in the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s new lawsuit against the Army Corps of Engineers over the Dakota Access Pipeline.



The lawsuit, filed in October, accuses the Army Corps of unlawfully allowing the oil pipeline to operate without an easement, a complete environmental assessment or sufficient emergency spill response plans. The tribe ultimately wants a federal judge to shut the pipeline down.


Standing Rock has opposed the pipeline for years, saying it infringes upon the tribe’s sovereignty, has damaged sacred cultural sites and jeopardizes the tribe’s water supply.




The Army Corps of Engineers has jurisdiction over a part of the pipeline that passes below the Missouri River less than a half-mile upstream from the Standing Rock Reservation, which straddles the border between North and South Dakota.


“The Corps has failed to act and failed to protect the tribe,” Standing Rock Chair Janet Alkire said in an October news conference announcing the lawsuit.


The more than 1,000-mile pipeline, often referred to as DAPL, passes through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois. Its pathway includes unceded land recognized as belonging to the Sioux Nation under an 1851 treaty with the U.S. government.


Dakota Access in Iowa​


The crude oil underground pipeline crosses 18 counties in Iowa, running diagonally from the northwest to the southeast.

The Iowa Utilities Board — now called the Iowa Utilities Commission — in 2016 granted its developers a permit to build the pipeline. Iowa regulators also granted the developers eminent domain authority, allowing them to force unwilling landowners to grant easements for the route in exchange for compensation.

In 2019, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled against landowners protesting the use of eminent domain and instead sided with Dakota Access and the regulators.

In 2020, the Iowa regulators gave support to a request by Dakota Access to double its capacity. Developer Energy Transfer Partners — a Texas-based consortium of companies and investors — said a higher volume was needed because of demand.

North Dakota joined the case on the side of the Army Corps earlier this month, arguing that closing the pipeline would cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue, put thousands of jobs at risk, hamper regional supply chains and harm the environment. State attorneys also argue that a federal court order shuttering the pipeline would violate North Dakota’s right to regulate its own land and resources.


In a brief filed last week, the 13 additional co-defendant states made similar arguments. The group, led by Iowa, said Dakota Access is integral to the health of regional energy and agriculture markets.


“DAPL plays a vital role in ensuring the nation’s crops can come to market — not because DAPL itself transports agricultural products, but because every barrel of oil that DAPL transports is a barrel that does not take space in a truck or a train,” the states wrote.


This also makes highways and railways safer and reduces pollution, they added.

Dakota Access pipeline route - Gazette graphic Dakota Access pipeline route - Gazette graphic
The 13 states that joined the lawsuit are Iowa, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas and West Virginia.


According to the states’ brief, the pipeline has paid over $100 million in property taxes to Iowa counties and over $33 million in property taxes to South Dakota counties since it began operating in 2017.


The Army Corps of Engineers has not yet filed an answer to the tribe’s lawsuit.






Energy Transfer, the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline, has not requested to intervene in the suit.


The case is before U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg, who oversaw the tribe’s 2016 lawsuit against the Army Corps opposing the pipeline.


North Dakota in 2021 sought to join that lawsuit as well, but Boasberg denied the request as the case was in the process of wrapping up.


That case concluded with Boasberg instructing the Army Corps to conduct a full environmental impact study of the pipeline, which still is in the works. Boasberg also ordered the pipeline to stop operating pending the completion of the study, though that demand was ultimately overturned by an appellate court.


In a separate federal court case, North Dakota seeks $38 million from the U.S. government for costs the state says it incurred responding to Dakota Access Pipeline protests.

This article first appeared in the North Dakota Monitor.

If there's one thing the CFP has taught me it's that Iowa doesn't stand a chance to win a Natty. Ever.

Everyone was ripping on Indiana last night after losing to ND in such a lopsided way. As it turns out, 24 hours later all the other lower seeded teams got smoked in the same fashion. The 12 team playoff is just a ruse. A feel good hopeful moment for the teams that really don't belong against the blue bloods. And then reality will sink in. Football isn't basketball where a team can get hot for a couple days and make a deep run. In summary, the CFP sucks. And it shows even more that the Hawks will never be NT winners. Booooooooooooo!

2bekbc.jpg
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT