ADVERTISEMENT

‘Take the land’: President Trump wants a border wall. And he wants it by Election Day.

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,878
59,504
113
Deplorable:

President Donald Trump is so eager to complete hundreds of miles of border fence ahead of the 2020 presidential election that he has directed aides to fast-track billions of dollars' worth of construction contracts, aggressively seize private land and disregard environmental rules, according to current and former officials involved with the project.


Trump has repeatedly promised to complete 500 miles of fencing by the time voters go to the polls in November 2020, stirring chants of "Finish the Wall!" at his political rallies as he pushes for tighter border controls. But the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has completed just about 60 miles of "replacement" barrier during the first 2½ years of Trump's presidency, all of it in areas that previously had border infrastructure.

The president has told senior aides that a failure to deliver on the signature promise of his 2016 campaign would be a letdown to his supporters and an embarrassing defeat. With the election 14 months away and hundreds of miles of fencing plans still in blueprint form, Trump has held regular meetings at the White House to receive progress updates and hasten the pace, according to several people involved in the discussions.

When aides have suggested that some of his orders are illegal or unworkable, Trump has suggested he would pardon the officials if they would just go ahead, aides said. He has waved off worries about contracting procedures and the use of eminent domain, saying "take the land," according to officials present at the meetings.

"Don't worry, I'll pardon you," he is said to have told others.

"He said people expected him to build a wall, and it had to be done by the election," one former official said.

White House officials say the president is joking when he makes such statements about pardons.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper is expected to approve a White House request to divert $3.6 billion in Pentagon funds to the barrier project in coming weeks, money that Trump sought after lawmakers refused to allocate $5 billion. The funds will be pulled from Defense Department projects in 26 states, according to administration officials who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the matter.

Trump's determination to build the barriers as quickly as possible has not diminished his interest in the aesthetic aspects of the project, particularly the requirement that the looming steel barriers be painted black and topped with sharpened tips.


In a meeting at the White House on May 23, Trump ordered the Army Corps and the Department of Homeland Security to paint the structure black, according to internal communications reviewed by The Washington Post.

Administration officials have stopped trying to talk him out of those demands, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is preparing to instruct its contractors to apply black paint or coating to all new barrier fencing, the communications show.

Trump conceded last year in an immigration meeting with lawmakers that a wall or barrier is not the most effective mechanism to curb illegal immigration, recognizing it would accomplish less than a major expansion of U.S. enforcement powers and deportation authority. But he told lawmakers that his supporters want a wall and that he has to deliver it.

Trump talked about the loud cheers the wall brought at rallies, according to one person with direct knowledge of the meeting.

Former White House chief of staff John Kelly would often tell administration officials to disregard the president's demands if Kelly did not think they were feasible or legally sound, according to current and former aides.

During a conference call last week, officials at U.S. Customs and Border Protection told engineers from the Army Corps that the hundreds of miles of fencing must be completed before the next presidential election, according to administration officials with knowledge of the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal communications.

"Border Patrol insists on compressed acquisition timelines, and we consent. Their goal is to get contracts awarded, not for us to get a quality contract with a thoroughly vetted contractor," said one senior official who is concerned the agency has been hurried to hand out contracts as quickly as possible.

Military officials expect more contract protests because the arrangements have been rushed, the official added. The Army Corps already has had to take corrective actions for two procurement contracts, after companies protested.

The companies that are building the fencing and access roads have been taking heavy earth-moving equipment into environmentally sensitive border areas adjacent to U.S. national parks and wildlife preserves, but the administration has waived procedural safeguards and impact studies, citing national security concerns.

"They don't care how much money is spent, whether landowners' rights are violated, whether the environment is damaged, the law, the regs or even prudent business practices," the senior official said.

This official said CBP has suggested no longer writing risk-assessment memos "related to the fact that we don't have real estate rights and how this will impact construction."

While Trump has insisted that the barriers be painted, the cost of painting them will reduce the length of the fence the government will be able to build. According to the internal analysis, painting or coating 175 miles of barriers "will add between $70 million and $133 million in cost," trimming the amount of fencing the Army Corps will be able to install by four to seven miles.


In June, teams of U.S. soldiers painted a one-mile section of fence in Calexico, California, at a cost of $1 million. The coating, known as "matte black" or "flat black," absorbs heat, making the fence hot to the touch, more slippery and therefore tougher to climb, according to border agents.

At Trump's behest, the Army Corps also is preparing to instruct contractors to remove from the upper part of the fence the smooth metal plates that are used to thwart climbers. The president considered that design feature unsightly, according to officials familiar with his directives.

Instead, contractors have been asked to cut the tips of the steel bollards to leave a sharpened point. Trump had told aides this spring he thought the barrier should be spiked to instill a fear of injury.

The change in the bollard design is likely to reduce the overall length of the barrier by two to three miles, according to the administration's cost assessments.

CBP has used a pointed design in the past, according to agency officials, either by installing a pyramid-shaped cap or making what the agency refers to as a "miter cut" in the metal.

Trump remains keen to tout incremental progress toward his wall-building commitments, and in recent weeks, top Homeland Security officials have taken to Twitter to promote their advances.

In recent days, DHS leaders including acting CBP chief Mark Morgan and the top official at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli, have tweeted photos of border fence construction, echoing promises that 450 miles of new barrier will be completed by next year. Another senior administration official credited both men with injecting urgency, saying that "things are starting to crank away," even though Cuccinelli's agency is not involved in the project.

Dan Scavino Jr., the White House social media director, has asked for video footage and photos of heavy equipment digging up the desert and planting the barriers so that administration officials can tweet about it, aides said.

Administration officials involved in the project also defended the president's use of eminent domain laws to speed up the process.

"There is no more constitutionally permissible public purpose for eminent domain than national defense," said a current administration official who was not authorized to speak on the record about the contracting process.

"Our intention is to negotiate with every property owner, and every property owner will receive fair market value for the land," the official said. "But the land that is needed is not replaceable land. This is not like building a hospital or even a school. There is no alternative land to the border."

CBP and Pentagon officials insist they remain on track to complete about 450 miles of fencing by next year's election. Of that, about 110 miles will be added to areas where there is currently no barrier. The height of the structure will vary between 18 and 30 feet, high enough to inflict severe injury or death from a fall.

The chief of the Border Patrol's strategic planning and analysis office said a final decision had not been made on the black paint or other design requests from the White House.

"Ultimately, we'll do our assessment and determine what is the best for us operationally," said Brian Martin, the office's chief, adding that the agency is waiting to get border agents' feedback on whether the coating would be beneficial.


More at:
https://www.nonpareilonline.com/new...cle_1f7f9e23-f378-526d-afe5-3d9599ce0225.html
 
At this pace of idiotness, Texas will be "blue" by 2020.

Behind the scenes, even schmucks like Lindsey Graham must be shaking his head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
At this pace of idiotness, Texas will be "blue" by 2020.

Behind the scenes, even schmucks like Lindsey Graham must be shaking his head.

...and now we're pullin' FEMA funds for it.
If TX gets hit again by another major hurricane, or major precipitation event, and all the FEMA funds are tied up in a wall, expect Texans to get a little pissypants about that....
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
...and now we're pullin' FEMA funds for it.
If TX gets hit again by another major hurricane, or major precipitation event, and all the FEMA funds are tied up in a wall, expect Texans to get a little pissypants about that....

While there's a hurricane headed for Puerto Rico, and eventually Florida no less!
 
EDBgWv9WwAIkAM8
 
Get out of the way ladies the men are about to start building the big beautiful wall we all elected our President to build. I highly doubt putting a few post holes in the ground on someone’s desert property is going to be an issue.
 
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-texas-border-cemeteries-20190219-story.html

90


Last fall, the family found an attorney, who sent the Border Patrol a letter insisting construction shouldn’t start until experts analyze its effects on the cemeteries. Instead, Border Patrol officials waived laws designed to protect historic sites, citing the immediate need to protect the border, and moved ahead with brush clearing.
https://www.alternet.org/2019/08/gr...texas-might-be-dug-up-for-border-wall-report/

In a statement, CBP said it would avoid Eli Jackson Cemetery. But KVEO reported that so far, no legal protection for the cemetery has been passed.
 
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-texas-border-cemeteries-20190219-story.html

90


Last fall, the family found an attorney, who sent the Border Patrol a letter insisting construction shouldn’t start until experts analyze its effects on the cemeteries. Instead, Border Patrol officials waived laws designed to protect historic sites, citing the immediate need to protect the border, and moved ahead with brush clearing.
https://www.alternet.org/2019/08/gr...texas-might-be-dug-up-for-border-wall-report/

In a statement, CBP said it would avoid Eli Jackson Cemetery. But KVEO reported that so far, no legal protection for the cemetery has been passed.

Indefensible.
 
Graves are relocated all the time, don’t act shocked Joe.

...AFTER they've cleared all the legal hurdles and know WHERE the relocations will be made.

Not the case here: NO family members have any information. That's not "the liberal media" saying it, it is a local news channel that has talked directly with them.

There are procedures and laws followed when exhuming and relocating the dead, particularly military dead. And they are being bypassed here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Weird. Yet another thread that LC doesn’t have the time to pop into and remind us how badly run America would be if Crooked Hillary had been elected.
This is the kind of s*** that LC warned us Hillary would do. Seize land and openly break laws.
 
Last edited:
I still say build it along the south edge of I 10, the government already owns the land. Offer rewards to citizens who call in fence climbers as they travel between Texas and California. The small amount of land south of I 10 could be a no man's land like Road Warriors.

 
I still say build it along the south edge of I 10, the government already owns the land. Offer rewards to citizens who call in fence climbers as they travel between Texas and California. The small amount of land south of I 10 could be a no man's land like Road Warriors.

That would be funny except Trump will eventually order this level of enforcement. Maybe a Thunderdome style contest on pay per view. One man enters, one man leaves with citizenship papers in his hand.
 
Trump knows this is illegal. You don’t pardon people if it isn’t illegal.
Silence. No Mitt Romney. No talk of Iowa values by Joni Ernst. No solemn speeches by Chuck Grassley declaring that the integrity of the WH must be preserved. Silence.
 
Get out of the way ladies the men are about to start building the big beautiful wall we all elected our President to build. I highly doubt putting a few post holes in the ground on someone’s desert property is going to be an issue.
Beyond it being illegal without due process?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
I don't get why he can't just claim the wall has been built and that it is beautiful. His followers are morons. He can even tell them Mexico paid for it.

The reluctant Trump voters probably don't really care about the wall anyways. They can tolerate a bit more Trump boasting/lying if they're still with him this far.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT